Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 September 14

< September 13	September 15 >

September 14[edit]

File:Tawian-us-beef-import.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisting. I have added {{ffdc}} to the article to give notice. This should be discussed since it could potentially be argued that this image is acceptable under our fair use policy.

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tawian-us-beef-import.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UUUrlllllllllllhelpershibeta.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: spamtastic! --B (talk) 11:57, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could be text and link instead of an image but the URL seems black-listed. Lacrymocéphale 07:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's an erotic art site. I figure this can be speedy deleted somehow... —innotata 03:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Innotata: {{db-spam}} is what you are looking for. ;) --B (talk) 11:57, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cambridge University Crest - embossed.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 22. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:04, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cambridge University Crest - embossed.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Granollers view from Canovelles.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Technically unsourced, but given the upload suspected own work, with an assumed license. One non-free file may need to be split out or removed from the upload history. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Senate ES candidates sheet.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This was licensed tag as simple, but contains creative elements such as party logos. At best it's on official document (election material), but this would still need the license tag to be updated... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:48, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HotairballooninflationAlt.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can't match uploader name to credited photographer. Most likely own work, but can't definitively confirm, hence FFD referral. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:22, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It states that it's an edit, of the file now called File:Ballon2.jpg. Might it be good to look through file descriptions more carefully before bringing them here? —innotata 03:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant to File:Ballon2.jpg. Salavat (talk) 23:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We generally preserve alternate edits of an image (on Commons, not necessarily here if it isn't in use), but I don't see anything edited about this image (color re-balancing, smoothing, etc) - it looks like just a smaller version. So we're probably safe in deleting it. --B (talk) 12:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Automobile TRACK.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What license are the models from Racer under? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:28, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Belle Vue2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't meet the "minimal usage" of WP:NFCCP as there is already another fair use image of the same stadium building in the article. Of the two images, the other is more useful. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where are there any fair use images there? There's a perfectly good free one. --B (talk) 12:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gaby-El-Meneaito in 2018.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the owner, they don't seem to be mentioned specifically? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:31, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kelowna-LakeCountryFed.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be the work of a Canadian government agency, in which case it is copyrighted. —innotata 14:31, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bread used in kori rotti-2.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Packaging artwork would be subject to a separate copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Satyajit Chatterjee and Carlos Pereira-2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Querying licensing given the puppet design, This looks like a promotional photo as well. A clarification is desirable. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WNPN-COVERAGE.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 22. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:06, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:WNPN-COVERAGE.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:St. Ann's Academy8.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Refferal as subject of photo is 2D-art and not necessarily covered by Freedom of Panorama. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:07, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no FoP for 2D works in Canada, and it's just a photo of the sign. —innotata 00:23, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sainte Jeanne d'Arc-1-large.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic, Orphand - FlightTime (open channel) 18:11, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uspatent131873 1872.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:06, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned - FlightTime (open channel) 18:59, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons and put in Commons:Category:U.S. Corset patents. --B (talk) 11:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Artshot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as PD. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:12, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing conflict, This is either PD or it's GFDL, it can't be both. Also TOO query given product design shown. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the image history, it was originally uploaded as {{NoRightsReserved}} with no claim of authorship. Then the uploader added {{PD-self}} [1] and later an explicit statement of authorship [2]. Five years later, the uploader added {{GFDL-self}} [3]. I would say just remove the GFDL-self since you can't un-public-domain it. As for the product itself, I don't see anything copyrightable here. Text is not copyrightable. Utilitarian things (buttons, knobs) are not copyrightable. --B (talk) 11:33, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thomas Anthony Dooley III, MD.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Done -FASTILY 23:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a split request on this file but I note that the second file is apparently non-free, unused and was uploaded by a vandalism-only account; it should probably be deleted under WP:CSD#F5 Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JamesAGarfield HS.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a request to split the file, but the first version is marked as "fair use" and the source link is broken; it should probably be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:26, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; first version may be copyrighted. Insaneinside (talk) 01:28, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Granollers view from Canovelles.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This file has a split request, but to me the second version is a film poster that is almost certainly copyrighted (and in the unlikely case it isn't, of very poor resolution). It should probably be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:30, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tomb of Pope Clement XI requiem.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 22. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomb of Pope Clement XI requiem.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sagebrush cooperative-area map.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Per rationale in the last discussion Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing conflict, either its PD or it;'s GFDL, which is it? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:31, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ganjamarsh.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing conflict. License given is GFDL, but metadata says "Submitted into public domain on srwiki by User:Mladifilozof " ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:43, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was originally uploaded under the GFDL on the Serbian Wikipedia, so I've taken the liberty of moving it to Commons (it's under the same title on srwiki and hence Commons now). Shouldn't really have needed bringing here. —innotata 00:20, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:F8 file now available on commons, i have tagged it accordingly. agree with Innotata. --DBig Xrayᗙ 12:31, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LMM blue 4 - 30cm.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 22. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:15, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:LMM blue 4 - 30cm.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Torino Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free alternate logo for the 2006 Winter Olympics used decoratively (violates WP:NFCCP#8) B (talk) 22:35, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:20081117 Barack Obama Streetlight Banner.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of the copyrighted Barack Obama "Hope" poster used decoratively in South Side (Chicago) and Presidential transition of Barack Obama B (talk) 22:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.