Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 November 13

< November 12	November 14 >

November 13

File:EAST Reactor Photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Free image: File:EAST Tokamak vacuum vessel 2015.jpg Shizhao (talk) 07:04, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Uploads by Mull0329

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete, basically per Explicit - missing clear evidence of permission -FASTILY 08:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mull0329 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

File:Umdlib2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Swensonlobby.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Umdlib.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Maloskystadium.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Kirbyplaza-night.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:LendleyBlack wiki2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:LendleyBlack wiki1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Conflicting claims of authorship - this user credits the University of Minnesota-Duluth but also uses the {{self}} template. --B (talk) 02:31, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would guess that Mull0329 (talk · contribs) may have been an employee of the University of Minnesota Duluth, which may be why they used the {{self}} template and then also cited the source as being the institution. What is done in that instance? Randomeditor1000 (talk) 16:15, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The information is not conflicting per se, as Randomeditor1000 points out. I checked a few and couldn't find a previous publication online. Going by that, they are likely not copyvios. Please re-nominate if you can find these published somewhere prior to us. Also, should be moved to Commons. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:37, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:OTRS is required to verify that the uploader is an employee of the University of Minnesota Duluth and has the authority to upload these photos under free licenses. File:Umdlib2.png exists here in a higher resolution (1800×1187), which doesn't fair well against Finnusertop's assertion that these are previously unpublished. ℯ xplicit 05:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- @Finnusertop: Even if an image isn't previously published, if the copyright is owned by anyone other than the uploader themselves, we need a statement of permission from that copyright holder. Example, my brother is an amateur photographer and has some amazing photographs. If I were to upload something from him, and credit him, even though he has never published the photo anywhere, we still need a statement of permission. Even if this person is an employee of the school, you normally have to be a high-level officer in order to have the authority to issue licenses, so again, if this person has that authority, they would need to verify it via OTRS. --B (talk) 12:31, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.