Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 March 5

< March 4	March 6 >

March 5[edit]

File:Mobilink Indigo Billboard-2 (Shimla Pahari, Lahore)-c.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

photo of a billboard which is likely copyrighted Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:57, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pakistan does have full freedom of panorama, which would (probably?) cover this. However, give the quality of the image, I don't really see any usage for it. ALH (talk) 22:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Modernistas.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

doubtful own work claim, likely copyrighted. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DEAD DOZEN.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate of non-free File:DEAD DOZEN Key Art.png Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:07, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New Donny Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted logo, logo used in article presently is File:Doncaster Rugby League Football Club logo.png Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:25, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New french clef.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by File:GClef.svg Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:26, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New Logo Nick New Logo Nick Gas.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

doubtful own-work claim, orphaned copyrighted logo Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:28, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Perlan in April 2013.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The building is not the USA so I'm not sure how the FoP tag applies. Maybe this would be acceptable with a fair use license? Themightyquill (talk) 15:04, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The point of {{FOP-USonly}} is for cases like this: photos of buildings in countries without FOP, which can be kept on Wikipedia under United States FOP law. Read the template and its documentation for more information. —Granger (talk · contribs) 16:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bettendorf reachion diagram.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of text, easily doable by wikitext/mathtex if someone wanted it. It's tagged for commons, but "unused image of text replaceable by wikitext/mathtex" is usually grounds for deletion there too. DMacks (talk) 16:31, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fourier Series Harmonic Equation Of An TEM Wave.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused small image of text, easily doable by wikitext/mathtex if someone wanted it. It's tagged for commons, but "unused image of text replaceable by wikitext/mathtex" is usually grounds for deletion there too. DMacks (talk) 16:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Former Affiliations for Spica band members.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-quality image of text table, including word-processor proofreading marks. DMacks (talk) 16:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:White Other Overall.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic content: doesn't seem to match the 2001 Census data given in the ref cited at Other White#Demographics, which is where this image had been used. Perhaps it is just a subset of the respondants, but it's not stated as such, neither in the image/description nor the former surrounding content. I replaced it with a Graph-module graph with clearly visible values matching the ref. DMacks (talk) 17:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guillermo León Valencia.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence provided that this is a US Government work. Originally, this had no source information. It has since had a generic top level URL of www.columbia.com added as source which provides no real information to confirm the licensing claim. Whpq (talk) 17:42, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Image doesn't even seem to appear on the source provided and we'd need more info to confirm that it's a US government work. ALH (talk) 18:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.