Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 March 16

< March 15	March 17 >

March 16

File:James Ezekiel Porter of Little Bighorn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Superior scan available as File:James Ezekiel Porter.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:54, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to other JPG file. Salavat (talk) 07:11, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant per above. — Zzyzx Wolfe^(TALK_CONT) 15:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:S k kohli CGDA.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:S k kohli CGDA.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 05:05, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rev. Prof. Daddy Hezekiah.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This file has been upload by a user who has made four separate attempts to create an article about this pastor on Wikipedia, using four different variants of his titles. Each and every effort was highly promotional and poorly sourced and each has been deleted. Given the uploader's pattern of behaviour on Wikipedia, I am quite certain that, if accepted to Commons, this file will only be used in a fifth attempt to get an article on the pastor accepted. I've notified the user as required. KJP1 (talk) 07:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:11, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no foreseeable use. — Zzyzx Wolfe^(TALK_CONT) 16:00, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YukonQuestMap.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Listed as own work by the uploader ({{PD-self}}) but also sourced to a website. There is no evidence that the website belongs to the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The mix of multiple images was mine, hence own work statement. The jux-image of the main GPS platform has an insert zoom-in to show first-in 5 musher teams, to show the capabilities of the tech involved all in 1 photo - I added key icons to help explain shot.

I listed the credits for the base image captured - ie: the race organizer & the GPS platform producer. IMO the code is correct to pass the presentation to the wiki page & 'Rights' to producers.

I will make 1 more addition - an explanation of the "Replay" DVR area. I went to this effort out of admiration not profit. Greg0658 (talk) 14:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 07:10, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned and of dubious licensing. If the pictures are from another website and just edited together, which seems to be what Greg0658 is saying if I'm understanding correctly, that doesn't mean the rights are transferred. Without proof of proper licensing info from both http://yukonquest.com and http://trackleaders.com, it's hard to see how this could be allowed and since it's orphaned, there's no way to justify WP:NFCI. — Zzyzx Wolfe^(TALK_CONT) 16:10, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ok - so long Greg0658 (talk) 04:04, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bournemouth across the bay.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation - image is owned by Bournemouth Tourism, request immediate deletion Bournemouthtourism (talk) 12:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:20141216Rennaissance118.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

License reasoning given by uploader does not accord with the copyright restriction in the EXIF data. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:57, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:10, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. Also, while DocSavageNJ quotes from the website, the full quote from the section he's referencing is:
The State of New Jersey has made the content of these pages available to the public and anyone may view, copy or distribute State information found here without obligation to the State, unless otherwise stated on particular material or information to which a restriction on free use may apply. However, the State makes no warranty that materials contained herein are free of Copyright or Trademark claims or other restrictions or limitations on free use or display. Making a copy of such material may be subject to the copyright of trademark laws.

So it definitely doesn't supersede the copyright of the photo. — Zzyzx Wolfe^(TALK_CONT) 16:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joy Villa by Adam Singer.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Listed image source says license is CC-BY-ND, which is not compatible with the license given on the file description page ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:09, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, CC BY-ND, posted CSD F3 to file and notice to userpage. — Zzyzx Wolfe^(TALK_CONT) 16:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joy Villa Birthday party in Tokyo 2013 by Pieter Franken.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image source listed is under a CC-NC license which is not compatible with the license provided on the file description page. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:10, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, CC BY-NC, posted CSD F3 to file and notice to userpage. — Zzyzx Wolfe^(TALK_CONT) 16:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thorsten von Overgaard in London 2012 by Adam Singer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

License at image source is under CC-ND which is not compatible with the license given on the file description page. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, CC BY-ND, posted CSD F3 to file and notice to userpage. — Zzyzx Wolfe^(TALK_CONT) 16:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thorsten von Overgaard in Hong Kong 2011 by Mario Sixtus.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source image is under CC-NC license which is not compatible with the license given on the file description page. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, CC BY-NC, posted CSD F3 to file and notice to userpage. — Zzyzx Wolfe^(TALK_CONT) 16:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Toshiba 1983.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a free image as it contains non-free logo, (not simple enough for ToO or {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}), i.e. self-made photo doesn't mean the subject of image is free. Hard to find a non-free rationale for use in Baseball NT, even for historical purposes. Flickerd (talk) 16:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per above. — Zzyzx Wolfe^(TALK_CONT) 16:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dribbble Hangtime.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image being used decoratively. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 22:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per above. — Zzyzx Wolfe^(TALK_CONT) 16:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.