Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 June 26

< June 25	June 27 >

June 26

File:Qtum logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Querying if this logo is ineligible given that it's a complex geometric construction. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Said logo is ostensibly a geometric dissection, which as elaborate as it may seem, is not copyrightable under US law. In any case, this file is already on commons, so it's probably not needed. --Ben Stone 10:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Edith Smith Policewoman Cropped.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No verifiable author or publication information given for original photograph. Kelly ^hi! 10:59, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger Richard Nixon Bob Hope.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 July 4. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger Richard Nixon Bob Hope.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo for Scopus.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC) Image marked as non-free, but does not meet the Commons:Threshold_of_originality, so is actually in the public domain. Replaced by higher quality, scalable, public domain image at File:Scopus logo.svg on Commons. -- The Anome (talk) 14:55, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree with nominator re: originality. Sometimes it makes sense to retain both a jpg and an svg. In this case, the jpg just seems to be lower quality and unused, so delete works for me. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zingdigital.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Querying ineligibility given the customisation of the I symbol with concentric lines above it. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

India doesn't use sweat of the brow, and I have serious doubts that concentric lines rises above TOO. GMG ^talk 19:41, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to fall below India's TOO. The lines above the "I" are hardly technical. Relicense to pd-logo and transfer to Commons. Salavat (talk) 13:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Communism.hypnotism.and.the.beatles.cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The presence of a third party work in an FBI file does not necessarily make that third-party work a work of the US Federal Government? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Republication of a copyrighted work by the US government does not deprive the author of their copyrights. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 17:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikipediocracy logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and obseleted by an SVG version. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:08, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 13:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.