Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 July 30

< July 29	July 31 >

July 30[edit]

File:Prof. Kodur profile picture.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete; deleted by User:Explicit. DMacks (talk) 06:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

tagged OTRS received for almost 6 months. After reviewing the associated ticket, I think it is unlikely that permission will be confirmed FASTILY 06:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ToglManRacer.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. ℯ xplicit 05:57, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Product design/packaging artwork. Toy designs are copyrightable (as word the packaging artwork), and so a clarification on how this can be self, and the uploaders connection to the item shown would be desirable. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retag as non-free fair-use. It is used as the only image in the article specifically about this toy, so a picture of it in its original packaging, seems fine. DMacks (talk) 14:43, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: What kind of rationale should be put in if this is relicensed as non-free?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:39, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:39, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:52, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as non-free – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:10, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:La Sierra High School (sign).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete; Deleted by User:Explicit; User:Fastily uploaded non-free File:La Sierra High School Logo.png. DMacks (talk)

derivative of non-free content, there is no FOP for 2D works in the USA FASTILY 22:22, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Only image in La Sierra High School and clearly representative of its topic. Give it a FUR if you feel it is non-free. DMacks (talk) 04:16, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a good solution. The school still exists so adding a FUR would cause the image to fail WP:NFCC#1. The eagle logo is displayed, so de minimis could not apply. Fairly textbook non-free derivative case. -FASTILY 05:33, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reasonable concern. Logo is not critical for "photo of the school" context but cutting out the logo from this image would destroy it (not de minimis). A separate "school logo" file (fair use) would pass (logo of an organization to represent the organization) and a separate "image of the school" without such focus on the mascot could be free. DMacks (talk) 14:03, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...but why couldn't this be cropped down to be that logo-of-the-organization FU file? I cannot find an alternate logo or picture of their mascot on the school's website. DMacks (talk) 14:05, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Anyone willing to do the crop? Consensus seems to be leaning towards using it only cropped.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:42, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a photo pf the actual school is possible. As for a separate logo, the site does have a crest which would be usable under a non-free usage rationale. -- Whpq (talk) 13:52, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:40, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:52, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Whpq – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:12, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NSApolygraphvideo.webm[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 August 7. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:NSApolygraphvideo.webm (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wolves In The Throne Room.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

invalid fair use, a free file can be (and is) used in the article already RF23 (talk) 11:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as obviously replaceable. Could have been tagged with {{subst:rfu}} instead. --Whpq (talk) 02:58, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Svufoto1080.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete Svu edit (talk) 13:56, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Statue of Gen. Slocum at Gettysburg.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, but a local image description page exists. If you are wanting the image deleted, please nominate it for deletion on Commons. If you are requesting deletion of the local image description page only, use {{db-nofile}} if possible; if that is not possible, list it at WP:MFD. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to not be Slocum's statue at all but Meade's sk4p (talk) 19:27, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Further detail I had initially put on the image's own talk page (sorry about that):

Compare this picture carefully with the photo of General Meade's statue (File:Statue_of_Gen._Meade_at_Gettysburg.jpg) and I think you'll agree they're the same statue.

Compare with photo at this link:

http://gettysburg.stonesentinels.com/monuments-to-individuals/henry-slocum/

and you'll notice Slocum's statue's head is turning and his horse's mouth is open. Meade's head in his statue is more static and looking nearly forward, and his horse is at rest. sk4p (talk) 19:29, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Team pcitures at Donar past rosters[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 00:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These non-free team pictures are being used in Donar past rosters with no sourced commentary about the images. This article is also essentially a list of past team rosters so this usage does not meet with WP:NFLISTS. Whpq (talk) 23:23, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Trump Awakens Baby Balloon.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Black Kite (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no FOP in the UK for 3D works not permanently situated in a public place. See Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2018_July_23#File:Trump_Baby_Balloon_at_Parliament_Square.jpeg, c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump Baby Balloon.jpg. This file could be relicensed as non-free, but we'd have to pick one of the many Trump Balloon images. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - But there doesn't seem to be any explicit rule stating that other 3D works are forbidded either. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:47, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.