Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 July 13

< July 12	July 14 >

July 13[edit]

File:Cerro Colorado Mts.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As a photo of a natural feature (that is not the subject of any commentary regarding, say, any historical context in the article it is used in) this is very much replaceable by a freely licensed image and does not meet WP:NFCC. —innotata 01:20, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First, you have to find one. I looked before uploading it, way back then. And it does have historic significance, as a 1959 photo. It would be interesting to compare this one to a current image! Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 03:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Like it or not, that isn't how the non-free content criteria work, take a look through them; they require it to be unlikely a free alternative can be found or created now. Just being historic isn't enough to justify the use of an image, there needs to be some commentary that the image is valuable to. —innotata 05:24, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly fails WP:NFCC#1 and could have been tagged {{Di-replaceable fair use}} as it fails it so obvioously. -- Whpq (talk) 13:32, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nematocyst-discharged.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 July 21. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nematocyst-discharged.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pir Sohawa.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted on Wikimedia Commons and Wikitravel Shared as a copyright violation. —innotata 02:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SHKF-logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FFD refferal over ineligibility owing to the stylized S at the start. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:18, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:58, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cultured Meat Hamburger, created by Mosa Meat.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCCP#8 - Its presence is not going to significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic. Text could easily state the similarity. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

· Thanks Ron! Would it be useful if it was uploaded under a more forgiving license, say cc 4.0? Or is it more general practice to keep descriptions in text where possible? (In which case I could remove it from the article completely) Vdrijdt (talk) 19:18, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Vdrijdt, yes the image could stay if it were uploaded under CC4.0 BUT only the original photographer can do such a change.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joan Murrell Owens.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This file duplicates File:Granville evelyn.jpg but claims to be an entirely different person. I've no idea which is right so I don't think deletion under WP:F8 is appropriate. Nthep (talk) 15:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the upload here on the English Wikipedia is sourced to https://www.peoplemaven.com/p/RMJK8N/joan-murrell-owens which consist of user built content based on their about page. That makes it an unreliable source. -- Whpq (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U.S. Census 2000 reference map of ZIP Code 10814.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. Uploaded by a user blocked as a sockpuppet, and deleted from Commons in commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Images uploaded by sockpuppets of Jvolkblum as out of scope. Not particularly useful, and can easily be recreated from the Census site in a better format if it ever is. —innotata 18:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 12:39, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barton Boar shield.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly eligible for copyright, and dating to the 1990s automatically copyrighted globally on creation. Orphaned. —innotata 18:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 12:39, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Col. N.F. Batyuk in his headquarters during the Battle of Stalingrad.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether the copyright term on photos in the Soviet Union was still 5 years in 1942, but copyright was retroactively extended in 1961 so this was presumably still copyright in the Soviet Union when the US URAA went into effect in 1996. Orphaned, and currently licensed by Getty Images. —innotata 19:04, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 12:40, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charles David Tandy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence provided image was released into public domain upon donation to library in question (rather than simply being made available for the public to access). May qualify for non-free use. —innotata 19:07, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:District Map Honolulu City Council.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Works of local government in the United States are not exempt from copyright. —innotata 19:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing the copyright issue of this image. The City and County of Honolulu holds copyright of their works, but it allows the public to copy contents from its website without obligation to the City (check here). Should I change the image's licensing information? --Nihiloris (talk) 14:01, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nihiloris: They need to allow modification and commercial use for it to be considered free (libre) content. —innotata 01:12, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.