Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 January 21

< January 20	January 22 >

January 21[edit]

File:LatinRitePatriarchsmap.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused map with no foreseeable use FASTILY 00:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vasantrao Ghatge- 1 copy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

historic photo/drawing of some sort, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 00:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aneurinbevan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Aneurinbevan.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arthurbottomley.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Arthurbottomley.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Laming-Worthington-Evans.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Photo comes from Ireland's National Archives. There is no date given nor any information that it was taken by the British Government as the license states. We hope (talk) 03:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laming Worthington Evans.jpg PD photo this replaced. We hope (talk) 03:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Earlpeel.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Photo is at NPG with identification of photographer-(Mary) Olive Edis (Mrs Galsworthy). The license claims it was taken by the British Government. We hope (talk) 03:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Earl Peel cropped.jpg PD photo this replaced. We hope (talk) 03:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo has been relicensed. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 08:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's a PD file shown above that was replaced by this one. When there's a PD photo, we have to use that. We hope (talk) 12:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baroness Sheehan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission. This file was first uploaded with a link to ticket:2016082510006421, but I asked an OTRS agent to check and this file wasn't released by that ticket. The file started with a claim of CC BY-SA 4.0, but the uploader later changed it to OGL. There is no evidence for either license on the libdems.org.uk website that I can find. The uploader removed my F11 tag, so I'm listing here for permanence and potential further review and discussion. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All I found on the libdems site was this. "No third-party organisation has the rights to reproduce in whole or in part any of this website design, format, layout, appearance or structure within a functional website without the express permission of Office of the Chief Executive." So I'd say anything from that website would be in question re: PD. We hope (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SoapUI Pro 3.6.1 screenshot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Codename Lisa (talk) 12:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This screenshot is uploaded as non-free. Everything is fine and all, as far as WP:NFC is concerned. But the subject of this screenshot, SoapUI, is published under the terms of European Union Public Licence. Is it considered free license in Wikipedia? If yes, maybe we should replace the non-free license tag with a free license tag and ask an admin to restore the full-sized revision uploaded in 2011. Codename Lisa (talk) 11:58, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:963 Hao FM.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a free image due to lack of uniqueness, but I'm not sure ... because I don't know/remember if non-Latin characters are considered unique enough for copyright in the United States. Steel1943 (talk) 17:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HGParkway Western End.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 May 27. czar 17:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:HGParkway Western End.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baronharlech.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Baronharlech.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Duffcooper.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Photo has copyright notations at NPG and the photographer is identified as Howard Coster. File says Bassano Ltd, but still not unknown. We hope (talk) 13:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duff Cooper 1941.jpg PD photo it replaced. We hope (talk) 13:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marquesszetland.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Marquesszetland.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Richardcrossman.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Richardcrossman.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LordFaringdon.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:LordFaringdon.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lordhertford.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Lordhertford.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Walterrunciman.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Walterrunciman.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lordplymout.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Lordplymout.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Williammorrisson.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Williammorrisson.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Walterwomersley.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Walterwomersley.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kennethmartinlindsey.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Kennethmartinlindsey.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lordfeversham.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 May 26#File:Lordfeversham.jpg. Steel1943 (talk) 18:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LordstanleyMP.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Converted to non-free use Green Giant (talk) 18:09, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid license. Photo is listed as being from NPG and taken by Bassano Ltd. NPG page has no photo and indicates the photo which is not shown is from Walter Stoneman. Using Tineye has turned up only one match-The Daily Mail. There's no information regarding when photo was taken; Mail page has copyright notice at bottom. We hope (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We have no PD photo of this deceased person, so re-license of this as non-free may be an option. We hope (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have relicensed the photograph. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is fine for non-free use in the article. We hope (talk) 17:40, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:684lb Atlantic Giant Pumpkin (grown by Shawn King, 2005).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the source around the time of upload, there's no specific mention to the license indicated. Normally that basis on it's own wouldn't merit deletion because it's an old image and the standards are now different.

That being said, we have an an entire category populated with files with sound licensing and at higher resolutions. This image isn't currently being used and we would generally prefer a higher resolution file anyway. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nazi Reich Other Flag.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not own work, also superseded by File:Reichsdienstflagge 1935.svg Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 02:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ACanadaflag.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't appear to be own work as claimed, a quick Google search shows plenty of other examples Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Confederate National Party logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't appear to be an official logo, and if it is, then it's unlikely to be uploader's own work. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gtsjsh hidhcjcj.ong.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't appear to be a real flag, no encyclopedic value Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The file name and description say it all. Green Giant (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reunicfication Korean flag.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

user-made non-official flag, no encyclopedic value Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Green Giant (talk) 18:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adam zamoyski.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

low-quality, much higher quality image available at File:Adam Zamoyski.JPG Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Green Giant (talk) 18:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:B. Ahmed Hajee Mohiudeen.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

web-quality, unlikely to be uploader's own work. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Doctorate conferral GMU.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

web-quality, unlikely to be uploader's own work. No EXIF data Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Akram Moideen Thumbay.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

web-quality, unlikely to be uploader's own work. No EXIF data Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and fails NFCC#7. Green Giant (talk) 18:02, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Akbar Moideen - Awarded.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

web-quality, unlikely to be uploader's own work. No EXIF data, unlike File:Thumbay Clinic Umm Al Quwain.jpg. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom and most likely lifted from here. Salavat (talk) 02:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Salavat. Green Giant (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eks.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

too blurry for encyclopedic use, better quality photo of subject available at File:Amanda Palmer, Edward Ka-Spel & Patrick Q. Wright 2017.jpg Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and fails NFCC#7. Green Giant (talk) 17:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elm Park 1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

too low in quality for encyclopedic use. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 23:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Green Giant (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elm Park 3.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

too low in quality for encyclopedic use. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Green Giant (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elm Park 4.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

too low in quality for encyclopedic use. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 02:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Green Giant (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ESL black text 2016.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: transfer to Commons Green Giant (talk) 20:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo could be classified as a text logo and uploaded to commons, as its simple geometry makes it seem ineligible for copyright. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 23:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to pd-logo and transfer to Commons. Salavat (talk) 02:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
PD-textlogo: the threshold of originality is a little confused in Germany at the moment but this is clearly a simple logo. Green Giant (talk) 20:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.