Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 February 26

< February 25	February 27 >

February 26

File:Hannibal Lecter.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like a user-created collage which is being used in the infobox of Hannibal Lecter, while some sort of official collage from a single offcial source may be appropriate, user-created collages are problematic per WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFG. Unfortunately, this probably needs to be deleted unless individual copyright information for each image per WP:NFCC#10a is found and added to the file's page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gulf and Western logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense to free. I shall also undelete the previous larger revision, since F5 no longer applies to it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:31, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G+W logo is likely too simple for copyright based on US ToO. Check its licensing. There is also a {{Copy to Commons}} tag. Eye snore 15:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, the copyright banner can be removed. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 15:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Iftekharahmed96: Perhaps it is below the US ToO required for copyright protection. Eye snore 15:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to PD-logo and transfer to Commons. Easily falls below the TOO. Salavat (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Phlarp larp group end-of-winter 2013 Daily Journal meeting.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image is cited to a publication that does not appear to grant open license. The license-holder (listed as "Author" here, and cited in the linked source) does not match the name of the uploader's account here or the uploader's claimed name on wikivoyage:User:Ceadeus Slayer. DMacks (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, even assuming the uploader was the author the apparent discrepency in licesing would need to be addressed. ALH (talk) 19:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.