Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 September 21

< September 20	September 22 >

September 21[edit]

File:Aguste Dupin in Case Closed.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No need for non-free media in this page. Why is this here? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He's an obscure character that isn't referenced very often. I felt it merited a mention. Besides proving that the reference was made, including the image provided additional illustration. ―TBustah 05:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ℯ xplicit 00:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dow apologizes.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a more detailed fair use rationale. In particular, fails WP:NFCC#10. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOFIXIT Andy Dingley (talk) 10:07, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Implying I know enough about broadcasting to know who the copyright holder would be here ... I do not. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unfortunately we can't ask the uploader because he has passed away but I'm with BU Rob13 on this (might wanna remove the notice - unless we can positively identify the source then it must be deleted. DrStrauss talk 20:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DrStrauss: The source is pretty obviously the broadcast. We just need to know the copyright holder, really. I don't know enough to know who would hold the copyright, but if someone does, we could retain this. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VillaMedicicafaggiolo.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in 2007, not used since 2011. WP:NOTWEBHOST clearly states we do not host images that aren't used in articles or project-space. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete - yes, agreed. Govindaharihari (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ONLY because commons has the better File:Giusto utens, lunette delle ville medicee, 1599-1602, dalla villa di artimino, cafaggiolo 01.JPG. In cases of (actually quite well-known) artworks like this, nominations should check whether there is a commons equivalent first. Johnbod (talk) 14:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:William M. Connolley at Moeraki Boulders, Dec 2005.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 October 21. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:39, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:William M. Connolley at Moeraki Boulders, Dec 2005.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Golden Disc Awards.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a free file as its just a text logo Flow 234 (Nina) talk 10:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FCAJ.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by File:Bashas' logo.png Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:00, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Partisan's Mother.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Artist death year listed as 1964, How is this PD-Russia? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wooden Leg 1913.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image was tagged as keep local by third party (not uploader). If PD as claimed this should be at Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Richard Hawkins.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep local tag added by third party (not uploader). If this is PD it should be on Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alfabet palcowy2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Refferal as this was tagged keep local, but the claim is that it's PD-Poland. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Keep local" because PD stuff gets deleted from Commons all the time. I've taken an established Commons map, one that is used as the basis of dozens of other maps on WP, filled the countries with different colors to illustrate something, and then had it deleted as a copyright violation. Not discussed, just deleted. There's no rhyme or reason over there. The only way we can be sure to retain PD images, even the ones we make ourselves, is to keep a local copy. — kwami (talk) 17:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The concern raised has nothing to do with 'keep local'. The source you attributed to create this derivative is dead. Without it, we cannot verify the copyright status of the image, which in turn would satisfy WP:CSD#F4. -FASTILY 19:56, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated the Commons file, File:PJM alphabet.jpg, for deletion, since it was uploaded with a CC-BY-SA licence that conflicts with its unknown author status. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:. Original file was deleted on the Polish Wikipedia as copyright violation in 2008. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Super Famicom logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Clearly {{PD-logo}}. ℯ xplicit 00:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Referral on the grounds that I'm not so sure this logo is simple. If simple it should be on Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Two ovals and two circles partially eclipsed by other circles, in common colors, isn't "simple"? As for Commons, {{keep local}} exists for a reason. Anomie ⚔ 20:45, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Orange Harvest.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused locally (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), already copied to commons; no reason to retain local copy FASTILY 18:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to deletion of the local copy. Long time ago, but someone was dubious about using these expired-copyright photos, maybe because the photos could have had a separate copyright? Evidence-free argument, I think. Almost certainly work-for-hire for the newspaper. --Pete Tillman (talk) 03:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC), OP[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Siang Ang Thong newspaper, 13 December 1960.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fails WP:NFCC#8, no critical commentary in the article it is linked to FASTILY 18:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fastily How about now? --Paul_012 (talk) 00:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Critical commentary has been expanded upon. Copyright also expired in home country. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:James D. Zirin (short biography).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 19:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 00:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Fastily. -- Begoon 10:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Power Prit Glue.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 19:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brussels Enterprises Commerce and Industry logo.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense to PD-ineligible-USonly. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logo appears simple enough to be eligible for {{PD-simple}} and transferred to commons - thoughts? Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to fall below the TOO. Commons however doesn't cover Belgium in its Threshold of originality guide so relicensing as "PD-ineligible-USonly" might be a better option. Salavat (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.