Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 29

< January 28	January 30 >

January 29

File:USP Lee.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A PD-USGov image of a federal prison. Horrid-quality: it's tiny (200x150 px), it's blurry, and it only depicts a tiny portion of the subject. I drove past the place today and have a photo to upload (6016x4000 px), so this image will soon be replaced. This nomination should not be closed as "delete" until I come here and leave a link to the new photo or until the new photo's on the prison article. Nyttend (talk) 01:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jeff Ragsdale4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probably violates copyright. Can be found using Google on other websites. Techyan（Talk） 05:39, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2013 Now TV box.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like this image may fail WP:NFCC#1 - the object shown looks mostly utilitarian (and images thereof thus not derivative works), as such a free image could be obtained by photographing it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ASSET logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this logo meets the "selection and arrangement" standard for copyright protection as it's mostly coloured text. Opinions? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:10, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: It is an American logo so it is most certainly PD-textlogo. The US has a much higher TOO than that. --Majora (talk) 19:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be below TOO. Relicense to to PD-log and transfer to Commons. Also organise for the prior version to be restored. Salavat (talk) 11:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aerial Warfare in Battlefield 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A screenshot of copyrighted work cannot be released under a free license. The copyright still belongs to the creators of that work (in this case Electronic Arts). So this would have to be under fair use. Which I don't believe qualifies as a screenshot from a singular mission does not significantly increase the reader's understanding of the game itself (WP:NFCCP #8) Majora (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rio 2011 Soundtrack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:FILMSCORE, the current project consensus is "against having cover images in the album infoboxes in the film article. The poster image in the film infobox is sufficient for identification of the topic, and having cover images in the film article's album infoboxes is considered extraneous." The film poster at the top of the Rio (2011 film) article is nearly identical to this soundtrack cover. Mz7 (talk) 20:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rio 2 Soundtrack Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:FILMSCORE, the current project consensus is "against having cover images in the album infoboxes in the film article. The poster image in the film infobox is sufficient for identification of the topic, and having cover images in the film article's album infoboxes is considered extraneous." The film poster at the top of the Rio 2 article is nearly identical to this soundtrack cover. Mz7 (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wreck It Ralph Soundtrack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:FILMSCORE, the current project consensus is "against having cover images in the album infoboxes in the film article. The poster image in the film infobox is sufficient for identification of the topic, and having cover images in the film article's album infoboxes is considered extraneous." The film poster at the top of the Wreck-It Ralph article is sufficient to identify this soundtrack. Mz7 (talk) 20:08, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rob Rainford (November 2006).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No proof of permission to use. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Julie Maybury holding a framed photo of her daughter Kylie Maybury.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We already have two non-free images of the person on the article. This one is a violation of WP:NFCCP #3a and does not increase the reader's understanding of the topic at all. Majora (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that having a picture of Kylie's mother was OK. I'm happy to remove it if i was wrong. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 22:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul Benjamin Austin: Thank you for removing it. You can speed up the process if you want by tagging it with {{db-g7}} as that will signal that the uploader requests deletion. --Majora (talk) 23:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.