Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 28

< January 27	January 29 >

January 28[edit]

File:Clay Christiansen.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

on Commons with a superior resolution and crop as File:Clay Christiansen Organist.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:21, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tide type.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

on Commons under a superior file format: File:Tide type.svg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:22, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nazrac.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria#8 (contextual significance): there is no sourced, textual need for the illustration. No justification this boss image is integral to understanding the topic, such that its removal would be a "detriment" to the reader's understanding of the topic. czar 00:25, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Towerkensico.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image has attribution problems. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Towerkensico.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bantefa sodiq "porsh" toye at the opening of LEAD ENTERTAINMENT in republic of benin,Cotonou.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo czar 00:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Remote Play Clearer Version.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of copyrighted artwork, other photos of the device are already available, not worth converting to fair use for this screenshot (as it doesn't actually elucidate anything that isn't already in the text) czar 01:56, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Remote Play FAH.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of copyrighted artwork, other photos of the device are already available, not in use or worth converting to fair use. Software displayed is a mix of free and proprietary, so no indication that this is the free stuff. czar 01:58, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rzonegamecarts.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo is derivative of copyrighted artwork, unused. It's possible to display the cart without the art, if necessary. czar 01:59, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nesmax.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Without explicit statement of authorship and without EXIF data, these websized elements appear to not be the original work of the uploader. I would consider these eligible for di-no-source czar 04:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Snapple Bottles.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Subject of photo is copyrighted Snapple artwork. Needs fair use rationale to stay in article, if needed, or else delete. czar 04:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: what about this one too? File:RackofFlavors.png ww2censor (talk) 00:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor, yep, I think the same rationale would apply, though deletion of that one would happen on Commons. (Or it might get imported back to enwp so someone can add a fair use rationale, same as for this one) czar 02:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated it for deletion on the commons. ww2censor (talk) 08:32, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UN Members.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused/outdated duplicate of File:United Nations Members.svg, not worth importing to Commons, considering its incompleteness (lack of dots) doesn't have future educational use czar 04:50, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:M105s3041.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of computer. We have better shots of laptops such that this doesn't illustrate any additional educational concept. Would need unlicensed screenshot of Windows cropped out if this should be kept. czar 04:52, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RealmForgeScreenshot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Program/interface might be LGPL (haven't checked), but we have no indication that the 3D rendered content is licensed under the same license. If released by the copyright holder, we would need their documented permission. czar 04:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Libsecondlife-sceneviewer.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As summarized at commons:Commons:Second Life, the user who creates and uploads the 3D content used in the game owns said content. So in the case of Second Life uploads, we need confirmation that the WP file uploader is the visualized content's creator, such that their license covers the copyright of the 3D assets depicted in the resulting screenshot. For example, we need confirmation that the house and avatar pictured here were re-licensed or consented under the given licenses. czar 05:50, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Romonet logo 2013.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete. Replaced by File:Romonet logo.png whose history also contains this logo. Majora (talk) 06:29, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abkhazia Visa.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus NFU claim. There is no real discussion of the visa - its a gallery so clearly fails NFCC as a decorative image. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Christina Chan-Nae.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image metadata says this came from Facebook, so this is likely to be a non-free image. It's not used in any article. John of Reading (talk) 07:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(More) I see from the uploader's talk page that there is already a discussion for this file at Wikipedia:Files for_discussion/2017 January 23#File:Christina Chan-Nae.jpg. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note Renmararnejo13 and Limpiadomaryrose9 (talk · contribs) have edited some of the same pic files and may be the same person. As far as I can find none of their pics are being used in any articles. All are of children of various ages. I am leery of having any of the pics just sitting in Wikipedia file space. Now, I have not done much work with pics in any form so I may be off base and I offer my apologies if I am. OTOH I did want those of you who do know what is and is not allowed to be aware of what I have found. MarnetteD|Talk 20:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update John of Reading both editors have been blocked for their socking. What would be the best way to delete the pictures? Mass nomination, mass speedy tagging or something else? Thanks for any assistance and suggestions that you have. MarnetteD|Talk 00:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD: If you can find a speedy deletion tag that fits, then by all means try it. But "uploaded by someone who is now blocked" isn't by itself a good enough reason to delete an image. You could try a mass nomination. Some of them are at Commons, so you'll need to nominate them there. -- John of Reading (talk) 06:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per all that we have already discussed here. MarnetteD|Talk 17:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anna & Dolin 1929.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Anton Dolin, one of the subjects of the photo, is obviously not the photographer, so who is? An image taken in 1929 and published in 1982 may or may not be in the public domain but without the author and their death date the copyright status is uncertain. ww2censor (talk) 23:40, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.