Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 December 25

< December 24	December 26 >

December 25

File:Henry Cort in drydock after major refit.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

notable historical photo, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 03:30, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BhagatHome.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader says this is "own work" but the white strip at the bottom of the image looks like it may be a caption on a postcard. I'm not 100% sure about that because the image is very small but perhaps others could cast their eyes over it. Sitush (talk) 16:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It’s blurry and difficult to read, but it appears to be in a non-Latin script. 108.210.218.116 (talk) 21:31, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Singh is considered to be a Shaheed (martyr) in India. His birthplace, which is the subject of the image, is in what is now Pakistan. So no surprise re: the script. The place is a tourist attraction/museum. - Sitush (talk) 21:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This doesn't look to be own work. There are 6 other copies of the file shown at TinEye if we don't count those at WP. All are very small and have the caption; most are the same size as the file we have here. I'd say it was taken from somewhere else, possibly here. We hope (talk) 16:06, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The General Secretariat for Development Planning Organizational Structure.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The license statement explicitly forbids the use of graphics [1], but is this PD? ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:58, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tbx2 influence on chamber development of heart.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only papers on this site published under the GOLD Open Access option are CC-BY. This one was not published that way. It requires permission from the journal to use. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:05, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PLaSM Sample Geometry.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The software creator licenses images created by their software under CC-BY-SA, but there's likely a separate copyright owned by whoever actually created this image. We have no license from them. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:28, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sips at Livestream.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images on Wikia should not be assumed to be CC-BY-SA-3.0 per their licensing page. No license available on the image's page. Orphaned. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:39, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:11, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gitte Moos Knudsen 2007.gif.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not available under any specific license. Specifically, not irrevocable. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:17, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sam Lawrence, 1946.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Hamilton Public Library only owns the "copyright" to the digital versions, not the originals. That copyright probably doesn't exist (see {{PD-Art}}), so isn't relevant. The original copyright on the photograph was restored in the United States by the URAA; see {{PD-Canada}}. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Donald Clarke, 1946.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Hamilton Public Library only owns the "copyright" to the digital versions, not the originals. That copyright probably doesn't exist (see {{PD-Art}}), so isn't relevant. The original copyright on the photograph was restored in the United States by the URAA; see {{PD-Canada}}. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sweet Love by Anita Baker US vinyl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 January 2. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:40, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sweet Love by Anita Baker US vinyl.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lactococcus garvieae.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The URL for source is through a university's paywall, so we can't verify the license. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've removed the proxy from the links, and found some details that further cast doubt on the validity of the stated license. The article was published in 1998, a few years before Creative Commons came about. Oh, and the Copyright Clearance Center lists it as All Rights Reserved. So there's that. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.