Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 April 22

< April 21	April 23 >

April 22

File:RedRoomTR.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

file with unnecessary border - duplicate of File:RedRoomTRmmw.jpg Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:London Tube Map.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. czar 04:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can be replaced with one of User:Sameboat's unofficial maps. KMF (talk) 03:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. Don't be daft. The article is about Transport for London/London Transport's publicly issued map, not about the network. Therefore someone else's version is not an acceptable replacement. Useddenim (talk) 03:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The official map is the primary subject of the article Tube Map, therefore it is not replaceable per fair use rationale. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 11:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. This is the subject of the article. The image is sufficiently sized to give an understanding of the subject, but small enough to not be practically useful as a map. The fair-use rationale is valid.--DavidCane (talk) 11:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This may actually qualify as {{pd-textlogo}}. KMF (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that it would be a stretch to try to apply that to a map. There is more to this than just simple geometric shapes and text.--DavidCane (talk) 13:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Zone 1 can be recreated in five minutes using Paint.net. KMF (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Possibly it can be reproduced in that time, but the complexity of the layout and the effort needed to lay out the lines, stations and text from scratch means I think it passes the threshold of originality. In any case, it is protected by copyright - see here.--DavidCane (talk) 21:11, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      - If you've ever tried to draw a transport network diagram you'll realise that it's actually a lot more complicated than it might seem at first, and there are lots of decisions that need to be made, e.g. which lines to show, where to place them, what scale to use, which angles to use, which aspects of the line geography are important and which aren't, how to represent stations, how to represent interchanges between lines, which interchanges with services not shown should be included and how to represent them, which labels to show, where to place them, what geographical features (e.g. rivers) to include and how to show them, where the key is placed and what is included in it, whether to include additional information (e.g. step-free access, restricted opening times, limited services, zones, etc) and if so which bits should be included and how should they be represented, etc, etc. a 5 minute recreation of Zone 1 of any usable quality would of necessity be a derivative of an existing work. Thryduulf (talk) 15:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DavidCane. This is an image of the tube map, which is the sole subject of the article it is used in. Thryduulf (talk) 15:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Medzhibozh graves.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file taken from sk.vlasenko.net. Template:Vlasenko does not apply to this site. --geagea^Talk 04:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Character Long Cur.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by vector version Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Character Long Semi.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by vector version Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Character Long Cler.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by vector version Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Character Long Simp.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by vector version Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Character Long Trad.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by vector version Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AffendiJoo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Agf behind scenes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Agnew Hall interior.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Agust ivar vilhjalmsson.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AjayDarade 2015.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused personal photo Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AjijicCiberCafe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ajocz0002.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alacitas 01 LaPaz 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Acker bilk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per WP:ORPH, "being an orphan is not in any way, shape, or form a criterion for deletion". Andrew D. (talk) 11:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused low-quality image of a non-notable person. As it is unused, it fails WP:NOTWEBHOST. The file is not useful for any educational purpose, and thus fails c:COM:EDUSE and can't be moved to Commons. --AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 12:36, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the file is misnamed. The subject is Acker Bilk, who is notable. Why can't it be moved to commons - it has a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License?--DavidCane (talk) 13:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for pointing that out - couldn't find any notable "Aker Bilk" in either the editor's contributions or on Google. This request is Withdrawn. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The file was moved from File:Aker bilk.jpg to File:Acker bilk.jpg by Jon Kolbert (talk · contribs) at 15:46, 24 April 2017 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Al Smyth 2016.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Crown flash above cumulonimbus 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete (non-admin closure) -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 15:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file should be deleted as it is a lower resolution duplicate of the file File:Crown flash above cumulonimbus 2.jpg -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 02:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures are different and show the 'crown flash' moving between the two shots, this is intentional - please do not delete. Timbits82 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.72.47.129 (talk) 16:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They look exactly the same. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 02:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a difference in the crown flash in the center-left of the images. Of course, this is all moot as the images are copyvio of the original video as it is licensed under the YouTube Standard License, a non-free license. --AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 13:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tag bombing.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant attempt to get around an AfD discussion that is going to result in the deletion of the article. Uploader attempted to make the image useful by putting it on Wikipedia:Tag bombing when it clearly is nowhere near that level replacing an image that actually is representative of that. Majora (talk) 19:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the image on that page is a copyright violation and has been tagged for deletion on Commons. Since this image contains a copyvio it is also a copyvio and has been tagged for speedy under ~~G12~~ F9. --Majora (talk) 19:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a new version of the file that no longer has the copyvio and has been cropped to just show the tags at the top and the textual content affected by inline cleanup tags. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 20:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) @Luis150902: The image is still in the history and is still considered a copyright violation. It is also still a blatant attempt to get around the community's decision at AfD. That is generally frowned upon when people try to do that. It also isn't tag bombing since a good number of those tags are duplicates. --Majora (talk) 20:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an image used to circumvent deletion procedure and policy. --AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 20:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jake Leahy 2017.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete, invalid release. Nowhere does it say that it also includes commercial reuse nor does it mention a CC BY 4.0 license. Copyright releases need to be specific to be valid.

Also, the copyright holder is the photographer, not the person in the photo unless the copyright is transferred via legal action or contract (such as work for hire). Can't confirm that Jake Leahy even has the legal right to release this image. Majora (talk) 23:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.