Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 November 6

< November 5	November 7 >

November 6[edit]

File:Suprapubic Catheter.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image. Passable quality, but not sure there is a need for this. Safiel (talk) 00:18, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ListofWWEnemies.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nonfree comic art used in a list article. The image is not the subject of any sourced commentary in the list and is usage is purely decorative falling to satisfy WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 02:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Westonaprice2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 04:45, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The commons equivalent of this image was considered to be PD. What is the correct status? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably "t'would be nice to know why the Commons file is tagged as PD-1923, do we have evidence of publication?" Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:07, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need to determine proper licencing
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Amanda (aka DQ) 02:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as fair use. Nominated the Commons version for deletion since there is no evidence that it is PD. czar 08:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cincinnatiroyalslogo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep the two old files and convert to {{PD-US-no renewal}}. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 15:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Historic National Basketball Association logo being used in Sacramento Kings#Franchise history. There is no critical commentary on the logo in this section of the article. The text description of the logo in Sacramento Kings#Team logo, uniform and colors is unreferenced. I believe that the use of this logo in this way is in violation of WP:NFCCP#8. ★ Bigr Tex 20:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Cincinnatiroyalslogo.png and File:RRoyals.png, no opinion on the rest. These seem to fall under {{PD-US-no notice}} given the dates, the lack of a copyright notice and that it's highly unlikely an used logo would be unpublished. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further consideration of the last two files
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Amanda (aka DQ) 02:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DeltaQuad: This doesn't happen very often but the auto-closing bot works off of the file in the header. So if that is deleted but others in the set still exist the section will still be closed by the bot. You have to move some stuff around to get it to stay open. Oh and while I'm here, keep on the remaining two files. --Majora (talk) 04:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to close this one but I don't see the case for keeping the logos. They are not the subject of sourced commentary so they don't meet the contextual requirements of the WP:NFCC... Delete remaining files. Ping me if you have some sort of counterargument or find sources that justify the non-free images? czar 08:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michelle Branch - Breathe.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two images were added into the infobox of this article; this image is not necessary to show or add because majority of the time, it has been used as Promotional material, the other was commercial which is more necessary to use. troublednbored (talk) 04:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Padvinders van Duinwijk.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 09:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heavy Sixer ID3.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused crop of File:Heavy Sixer ID.jpg, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 09:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Starfox team logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible derivative of non-free content (video game logo) FASTILY 09:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Christian Aid Logo.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep UK logo as US-only czar 08:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logo currently being used in Christian Aid and Platform2. Files does have a non-free use rationale for "Christian Aid", but does not have one for "Platform2". File has been tagged with {{di-missing some article links}} since February 2011 and I don't think the decorative way the file is being used in "Platform2" complies with WP:NFCC. So, if this file is licensed correctly as a {{non-free logo}}, then I suggest keep in "Christian Aid" and remove from "Platform2".

For what it's worth, it might be possible for this file's licensing to be converted to {{PD-logo}}. The UK's threshold of originality is quite low compared to other countries, so it might not qualify as public domain for Commons. Perhaps it is simple enough to keep locally on Wikipedia as {{PD-USonly}}? If the consensus is to convert to "PD-USonly", the file's usage would no longer be subject to the NFCC and it could be kept in both articles. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:22, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and change licensing to "PD-USonly" as the image is below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 02:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relicense as PD-USonly

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:53, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fuel oil placard.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a duplicate of an svg file on commons, there is no need to have it here. See File:DOT hazmat class 3 (alt 2).svg. -- GB fan 13:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scott Kroopf.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is alive so it would be possible to create a free image and as such WP:NFCC#1 is not met. SmartSE (talk) 21:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse: Image tagged for speedy deletion. It will be deleted in 2 days. Much faster than this quagmire of a process. --Majora (talk) 21:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Majora: Thanks. I'm a bit rusty on image tagging and I couldn't see which CSD applied. SmartSE (talk) 21:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.