Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 November 4

< November 3	November 5 >

November 4[edit]

File:Malliswari 1951 audio.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2015 Scarpaleggia parliamentary photo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. The claim is that the image is copyright exempt in the country of origin. However, images created by the government in Canada are subject to copyright and are not automatically in the public domain. This image is copyrighted by the House of Commons as stated in the source page and also in the EXIFdata. Whpq (talk) 05:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ready 2008 ACD Cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chirutha 2007 ACD Cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tagore 2003 ACD.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baadshah 1999 Audio CD.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Darr 1993 Audio CD.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Varudu 2010 Audio.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bunny 2005 ACD.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vennela 1 1by2 ACD.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ragada Audio CD.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

TVCatchup screen captures[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep only the infobox image Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two screen captures are being used in the TVCatchup article to illustrate the web site. This fail WP:NFCC#3a as only one image suffices to show what the site looks like. Of the two, File:TVCatchup screenshot2013.png was the first uploaded, is being used in the infobox and looks to be more representative of what the site does and so I recommend keepin it, and deleting File:TVCatchup Homepage Screenshot 2015.png. Whpq (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emirates A380 Touches Down in Doha for First Time.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of the first Airbus 380 to land at Hamad International Airport. The image is stated as being used as the primary means of identification for the airport but is in fact being used decoratively. There is no sourced commentary about the first 380 to land. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 13:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mughal-e-Azam, 1960 film soundtrack album cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8 §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the existence of the image was justififed with a description of the scene in the soundtrack section. Bollyjeff, am I wrong? Kailash29792 (talk) 16:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The 'Purpose of use' explains why it is being used in a non-soundtrack article. Text in the article says, "The album's cover image depicts a scene from the film in which Salim strokes Anarkali with an ostrich feather." During FA, the image reviewer said "copyrighted image, fair use rationale is acceptable." This should be allowed to stay. Bollyjeff | talk 18:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Laser brain:

@Laser brain and Bollyjeff: You have to sign your ping or the echo system won't deliver it. I redid it for you. --Majora (talk) 02:14, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Had the album cover shown Salim presenting the pink rose to Anarkali, we would have had that text in the article. So the fact that the image is described in text gives no weightage to why the image should be present. MOS:FILM#Soundtrack clearly says "WikiProject Film consensus is against having cover images in the album infoboxes in the film article". I would also like to add that this MOS has been not followed much and is not well-known unlike others and if this point was overlooked in previous reviews then that's fine. But if this MOS was specifically discussed in FA review and the image was still kept, then we might have to discuss it out with those FA reviewers. Until then I would assume that this was just missed out.
Kailash clearly has no understanding of usage of copyrighted non-free works. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:38, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: During FA the reviewer was wrong. --Majora (talk) 23:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: You got me wrong, "Dharma" Dhyaksha. I know soundtrack images should not be used in film articles due to copyright issues, but they can be in soundtrack articles. That is why I earlier suggested that Mughal-e-Azam have a separate article for its soundtrack, also due to the fact that the main article seemed heavily bloated. I even protested the merging of Jigarthanda's soundtrack with the main article because the soundtrack image would be forcibly deleted, and the main article would be unnecessarily bloated. As for the MeA soundtrack image, I say it be kept, but in a separate article. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarification. That helps me in knowing I didn't get you wrong! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are both correct, but there is no time or desire on my part to create a separate soundtrack article. I would like to ask that we not break up this article before November 12, so it can go TFA in the form in which it was promoted, with or without this particular image. @Kailash29792:, if you want to create a soundtrack article later, that's fine with me. You can save the picture and re-post it when you are ready if the delete policed are in a hurry. Bollyjeff | talk 13:48, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Until a further consensus on whether this image should stay or not is established, the soundtrack section will remain untouched. Especially by me. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note to admins: The article that uses this image is set to be Today's FA on 12th Nov. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Collection DLM luxe tajan 2014.tiff[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does not increase the reader's understanding of the topic at all. Clear failure of WP:NFCCP #8. Majora (talk) 23:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.