Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 November 29

< November 28	November 30 >

November 29[edit]

File:Hypnobopit01.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gikan sa Masa Para sa Masa.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability - possible copyvio Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muzika del Sur (title card).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability - possible copyright violation Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mim Southspot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability - possible copyright violation Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Motozone Southspot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability - possible copyright violation Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Onlocation Southspot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability - possible copyright violation Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RL Southspot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability - possible copyright violation Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wow Southspot.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability - possible copyright violation Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Naughty-nice-girl.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability - source? Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ian Simon "Fendi".jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wiese and others at the Obersalzberg.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 7#File:Wiese_and_others_at_the_Obersalzberg.jpg}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Icbigband poster.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ich beim fressen.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no clear usability Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Idog-bk-toy-ohio-08.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image, not really useful due to low-quality Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Battle city - Game over.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Oshwah (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source of this image? <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alan Kurdi lifeless body.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 7#File:Alan_Kurdi_lifeless_body.jpg}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Festival of Fantasy Parade Sleeping Beauty Unit.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This was deleted at Commons because it was a copyright violation and there is no FOP of artwork (which the dragon is) in the US. It can't be here either. Majora (talk) 03:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Majora: I thought it would be ok, but I understand. Do you have a suggestion for an image to replace it with on Magic Kingdom Parade? Elisfkc (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: Since the castle is such a center point of the parade perhaps that will do? FOP restrictions do not apply for buildings so it would be fine. We have one here. Sorry about the image by the way. It is a really nice photo. We just can't use it. --Majora (talk) 21:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Majora: Thanks. Since the article itself is being nominated for deletion, I'll wait to see that result before figuring out what image to put in there. Elisfkc (talk) 00:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michael Arrington and Mark Zuckerberg.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCCP #8. Image is not discussed in the text at all. No contextual significance whatsoever. Conference is annual as well. So free use images could conceivably be created. Majora (talk) 04:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hahn-Cock.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 29#File:Hahn-Cock.jpg}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A text from The New York Times in Helvetica.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect upload. Doesn't show Helvetica but some form of News Gothic (check the 'g' in particular). Also not really necessary for the article. Blythwood (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Siege Week still image.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCCP #3a. See other FFD of images uploaded by this same editor here. Majora (talk) 22:13, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been told these images are perfectly fine. One image you have listed has already been approved. These images are not in violation of fair use.FryUp32 (talk) 22:15, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've been told nothing. That discussion was never closed. And images is basically all I do here. I've already tried to explain to your how our fair use policy works. If you refuse to listen that is your choice. The images will be deleted regardless. --Majora (talk) 22:22, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think they will be. As I say, one was already approved just today. If all you do is images, get better at it, as you are making an issue when there is not one. The images are not in violation of fair use policy, and nothing you say is going to change that.FryUp32 (talk) 22:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on I approved nothing - We both edit warred over the source on an image- You added a URL which I was happy with - As I said below I have next to no understanding of the image policy - I just assumed that image was fine and that was it. –Davey2010^Talk 23:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alison King and Julie Hesmondhalgh Siege Week interview.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCCP #8. See other FFD of images uploaded by this same editor here. Majora (talk) 22:13, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been told these images are perfectly fine. One image you have listed has already been approved. These images are not in violation of fair use. Accept it FryUp32 (talk) 22:16, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This is just used for identification of a living person, where a free replacement could conceivably be created. The subjects are not in costume or otherwise in character in any way, so the video screenshot could be replaced by a freely-licensed photograph or two. Therefore, this image fails the first Non-free content criteria, and is subject to deletion. -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 00:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carla Connor Siege Week edited.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Oshwah (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:03, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As per above this user as uploaded ton of these, All fails WP:NFCCP #3a. –Davey2010^Talk 22:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just like you agreed File:Alison King headshot.png was fine, the images are not in violation of fair use policy, nor are they overused. There are not too many of them. There is no problem with these images so just leave it be. FryUp32 (talk) 22:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have next to no understanding of the image policy here and although I assumed they were fine they obviously wasn't, I'm not correct on everything here unfortunately. –Davey2010^Talk 23:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carla Connor and Robbie 2.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Oshwah (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:03, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As per above this user as uploaded ton of these, All fails WP:NFCCP #3a. –Davey2010^Talk 22:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just like you agreed File:Alison King headshot.png was fine, the images are not in violation of fair use policy, nor are they overused. There are not too many of them. There is no problem with these images so just leave it be. FryUp32 (talk) 22:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carla Connor 2010.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As per above this user as uploaded ton of these, All fails WP:NFCCP #3a. –Davey2010^Talk 22:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just like you agreed File:Alison King headshot.png was fine, the images are not in violation of fair use policy, nor are they overused. There are not too many of them. There is no problem with these images so just leave it be. FryUp32 (talk) 22:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There only needs to be one image of a character per article, especially if they haven't drastically changed their appearance. Personally, I'd prefer File:Carla Connor Coronation Street.png be deleted and this one kept, but that's not how the discussion shook out. See WP:NFCC#3a for policy rationale. -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 00:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carla Connor Coronation Street.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Thanks Majora!, As this one's fine I'm obviously withdrawing, Thans –Davey2010^Talk 23:15, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As per above this user as uploaded ton of these, All fails WP:NFCCP #3a. - –Davey2010^Talk 22:51, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just like you agreed File:Alison King headshot.png was fine, the images are not in violation of fair use policy, nor are they overused. There are not too many of them. There is no problem with these images so just leave it be. FryUp32 (talk) 22:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010: This one is actually fine. One screenshot of a fictional character to illustrate the article directly about said character is acceptable under the fair use policy. Where it gets confusing is the same image cannot be placed on the actor's page as they are still alive and a free use alternative could conceivably be created. --Majora (talk) 23:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carla Connor (Alison King) in Siege Week 2.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Oshwah (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:03, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As per above this user as uploaded ton of these, All fails WP:NFCCP #3a. –Davey2010^Talk 22:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC) –Davey2010^Talk 22:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just like you agreed File:Alison King headshot.png was fine, the images are not in violation of fair use policy, nor are they overused. There are not too many of them. There is no problem with these images so just leave it be. FryUp32 (talk) 22:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Music poster of Ek Tha Hero.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8, Cover of soundtrack for film. See MOS:FILM#Soundtrack. Majora (talk) 23:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.