Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 November 24

< November 23	November 25 >

November 24[edit]

File:Mans19S.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation, taken from the school's website. It appears a higher quality derivative works is on the school's website http://www.osobs.com/sites/default/files/images/mansion-heads[1].jpg, the original has more than likely since been deleted. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image is also not of high quality. Potentially replaceable if the location is accessible. 21:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anthony Hudson Press 2015.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 2#File:Anthony_Hudson_Press_2015.jpg}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adamredonesie.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Description is "Adam Grandmasion in a red onesie displaying a proud stance", and the upload is the only edit. Not used or useful. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 02:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : No clear use for file on project. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ana Mulvoy Ten Photo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence uploader has copyright of this image, source is "Photoshoot" ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 02:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iftekhar at Holbrooks.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete because of licensing issues; if the license of the image can be cleared up, a crop to focus solely on the sub may be warranted Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic, orphaned image. Interestingly enough, the uploader claims it is their own work however references someone else as the author of the image. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The background item appears to be an Australian Submarine, Could the image be cropped to just show that? In which case I would say Keep as photo of the ship/memorial, subject to the authorship being confirmed.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; aside from licensing issues, I have no reason to object to this as a picture of a submarine; it just has the distracting individual to the side, and he can be removed. Nyttend (talk) 20:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hazara Lover Heroes.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic, orphaned image. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hazara DP.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic, orphaned image. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Android 7.1 Home Screen.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. It is questionable that an use in such a list article would meet WP:NFCC#8 without substantial justification. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This might qualify for fair use, but the icons featured are not free, nor does the person making a screenshot own the copyright. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 02:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ardavan ZandiAtashbar 2005.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete all images except for On ship ardii.jpg, in case someone wants to crop that Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:33, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who this guy is but these images are orphaned and unencyclopedic. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would possibly retain File:On ship ardii.jpg as an example of a modern dockside..Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:35, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spiderweb windscreen.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep and tag "move to Commons" Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned unencyclopedic image. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons, Reasonable quality example of a specific type of windscreen damage which would be difficult for a normal wikipedian) to reproduce, and which recreation of probably should not be done outside of a safety lab. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Goldenorb.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with limited use with in the project due to its quality. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What's the quality issue? Example of a processor fan type, would make it in scope for Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bostonnsa.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image, poor quality. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Concur, 'Delete, nothing special about this snow scene. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spitakear.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus for deletion. Super-observation: https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/hazardimages/picture/show/226 may be the source Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image, no information as to where this is and how it could potentially be used on the project. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would say keep if more information provided. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Best guess is that this image was meant to be titled "Spitak Earthquake", (see 1988 Armenian earthquake), this image being an example of the building damge sustained, or not repaired subsquently. There is however no dating context on the file description page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Karabakhwara.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a still from a film. Around this time the user also uploaded a few other screenshots/stills from films. I have my doubts this user owns the copyright to this image. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jean Keane.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Tag as di-no permission, with a recommendation that this be converted to non-free in case permission is not forthcoming rather than deletion, unless a free image can be found Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:41, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a speedy tag on this because there is some indication on the description page that the uploader had some kind of permission. Unfortunately it does not appear to have been properly documented here. A discussion seems in order.

I should add that Ms. Keene died in 2009, so obtaining a new, free image is not an option. The website they say they got it from says its content is free, but it has a copyright notice at the bottom as well, so there's that to add to the confusion. I also can't seem to locate the source file there. As it was uploaded almost ten years ago who knows what changes may have occurred in all that time. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader of this image. I received written permission from the photographer, Nancy Jane York, in 2007. Wrad (talk) 04:46, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Written through an e-mail or something? If so, that can be forwarded as evidence of permission. Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was through email, but it was an old e-mail address that I have lost access to. Wrad (talk) 01:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pending permission being received via OTRS from the photographer. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-manster-eye.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Movie this image was taken from was released in 1962, so it's not nearly old enough to be in the public domain on that basis, and the image isn't even used in the article about the movie. It is rather used in the article about the actor. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:38, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, so cant be converted to fair use right now. Delete unless used in article on film to demonstrate a visual plot device. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ajim Cantina.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete all, pending the mismatch being cleared up Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader released these images under PD-self and specified that the image was taken by "Colin Kenworthy" but it appears the uploader goes by the name of Damien Slattery. Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:10, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UN SDG Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can't see any public domain statement on the page quoted. And the document Download SDG Guidelines is very restrictive regarding usage of the documents. --Albinfo (talk) 15:04, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, haven't seen commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sustainable Development Goals Logo.jpg before. Maybe we can keep it becuase it's only a simple logo consisting of text and basic shapes. See also Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 31#File:Chart of UN Sustainable Development Goals.png --Albinfo (talk) 15:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's too complex to be PD-shape / PD-text. We could convert it to fair use and keep it for use in Sustainable Development Goals. It would have to be removed from Women's health in my opinion. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: @Diannaa and Albinfo: Needs a bit more information to justify a relicense; the arguments laid out in the Commons deletion discussion appear to be reasonable enough to warrant further discussion.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:00, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:00, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maryland M Bar Primary Athletic Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PD image; File:Maryland Terrapins logo.svg has replaced this image in all articles. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 17:42, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.