Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 May 9

< May 8	May 10 >

May 9[edit]

Front covers of Dragon Quest IV: Chapters of the Chosen[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete first file; keep the second. — ξ ^xplicit 13:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Famicom Dragon Quest IV packaging (front).jpg (separate discussion previously; make new comments at the bottom of the section)

This image is not used as an infobox image for Dragon Quest IV: Chapters of the Chosen. Also, it is a Japanese-language cover. I'm unsure whether its presences helps readers understand the video game as a whole very much. As a non-infobox image, however, without text description about the image itself, the image may seem extraneous. Shall it replace the English-language infobox image instead? George Ho (talk) 00:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove: not used according to its stated rationale: "to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question". Therefor the rational is invalid WP:NFCC#10c – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Finnusertop: Shall the image be used as an infobox image instead? George Ho (talk) 04:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should. See my rationale on the other discussion. Jonny2x4 (talk) 05:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion about it. I'll rather leave the decision to editors who are familiar with the topic. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Consensus was overwhelmingly against the position Jonny2x4 took last time this came up. ( Talk:Dragon_Quest_(video_game)#Cover_art_of_Dragon_Quest , Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Archive_117#Packaging_art_on_Dragon_Quest-related_articles So don't change the infobox image.

As for the fate of this image as a non-infobox image, as usual, if sourced commentary can be found on it and included in the article, then it's fine. http://www.technobuffalo.com/2014/10/11/history-of-dragon-quest-localizations-1989-to-2001/ is a bit weak, I'll be honest, but it's *probably* okay. Adding a better source on the impact of Toriyama's art on the franchise's popularity in Japan would make the rationale stronger though, since the above source is only whining about "maybe the series would have been more popular if it'd had Toriyama art in North America". SnowFire (talk) 00:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SnowFire:, I would argue that the only reason the consensus was overwhelmingly against me was because my edits were BOLD in nature and I ended up being involved with an edit war against another user who wasn't exactly cooperative with me, which didn't work in my favor. It doesn't make any sense that all the Final Fantasy articles from II through VI used the Japanese FC/SFC covers to reflect the actual titles used by the article, but when you do the same with the Dragon Quest series, it's suddenly becomes an issue. Then again, Wikipedia mostly works through mob rule anyway. Jonny2x4 (talk) 01:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonny2x4: I dunno. I don't think you'd have gotten any different feedback had you asked first before you started editing. My opinion on the matter certainly has nothing to do with your edits, we just disagree for reasons stated before. Also, "mostly works through mob rule" is usually considered good, with the non-mostly parts being more suspicious.... anyway, every editor on Wikipedia can easily name several cases where the "consensus" is Just Wrong, just which parts of the consensus every editor dislikes differ. So I wouldn't worry too much. SnowFire (talk) 18:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dragon Quest IV cover.jpg (separate discussion previously; make new comments at the bottom of the section)

The file page was originally of the Nintendo DS cover. I changed it to the NES artwork. At first I wanted to decide whether to retain the NES one or revert back to the Nintendo DS cover. However, there is the Famicom cover, which is separately nominated for discussion. The video game project guideline encourages English-language covers to be infobox images. If the English-language cover must be kept rather than replaced by the Japanese one, shall we retain the NES or revert back to DS? George Ho (talk) 00:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I much rather have a packaging artwork that has the Dragon Quest IV title on the infobox over one that has Dragon Warrior IV (same thing with the other Dragon Quest games from I through VII), given how the article is using the original Japanese title. The games were originally released on the Famicom (or the Super Famicom, in the case of V and VI), so I think those are the versions that should be used on the infoboxes. I actually tried to use the Famicom packaging for the infoboxes a few months ago, but I was met with a bit resistance due to the guidelines' preference for English language packaging, even though there doesn't seem to be much of an issue for the Final Fantasy series (IV and VI used the Japanese packaging despite having English releases). Personally I think an exception should be made with the Dragon Quest series, given how ubiquitous Bird Studios' promotional art with the franchise. Jonny2x4 (talk) 02:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Consensus was overwhelmingly against the position Jonny2x4 took last time this came up. ( Talk:Dragon_Quest_(video_game)#Cover_art_of_Dragon_Quest , Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Archive_117#Packaging_art_on_Dragon_Quest-related_articles Use the original NES cover IMHO, and no need to have this FFD. SnowFire (talk) 00:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about the DS box cover, SnowFire? George Ho (talk) 16:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't use it? At least by current non-free use standards, we only get 1 image "for identification", so any other images need to have critical commentary, which I doubt the DS box has. It *might* be okay to create a collage image that includes both but that might be being a tad too clever. (To be clear, if I was in charge of Wikipedia, I'd have significantly relaxed non-free requirements and say to include both, but that isn't the current policy.) SnowFire (talk) 21:17, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merged discussion (make new comments here)

I have merged two discussions into one. I will explain soon. This is George Ho actually (Talk) 01:20, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since the Japanese image is not suitable as an image outside the infobox, I reinserted the Japanese cover art into the infobox. I could not replace the English-language one because of WP:VGIMAGES, which is a project guideline. I retained two images in the infobox just to prompt readers into discussing the front covers as I did at Star Ocean (video game). Because rules normally discourage using more than one front cover without adequate critical commentary, we have no choice but to keep one and delete the other. Pinging SnowFire, Jonny2x4, Finnusertop. This is George Ho actually (Talk) 01:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As for the NES vs DS image debate, maybe that has gotten either resolved or stale unless I'm wrong. I think NES image reflects the game's original intent as the NES version was released in North America. This is George Ho actually (Talk) 01:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a strange line of reasoning. WP:VGIMAGES doesn't override WP:NFC, and being in an infobox doesn't waive fair use requirements. Either the critical commentary on the cover is insufficient, and then we should just delete the JP cover, or there's sufficient critical commentary, and we should just revert the article to the state it was in before where the JP cover appeared in the section on Toriyama's art. This seems to be making this discussion way, way more complex than it needs to be.

While I know I mentioned the collage image above (in reference to the DS image), I wasn't really thinking of the infobox as the place for something like that. SnowFire (talk) 01:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When you said "Don't use it?", SnowFire, was that a question, or did you accidentally type the question mark (?) in? George Ho (talk) 07:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EgoraptorConvention.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to the licensing on the file at flickr, this is CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 which is not sufficiently free (no derivative works, and no commercial use) Whpq (talk) 04:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RossODonovan.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is this actually an image that the flickr uploader holds the copyright to? According to the flickr page, the name of the file there is "Screen Shot 2016-05-08 at 11.09.39 PM" which seems to indicate that this was a screen grab probably from a video stream. Whpq (talk) 04:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of the image looks like a screengrab as well. I think your intuition on this is probably spot on. — foxj 12:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anchor Stones.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing clear evidence of permission FASTILY 06:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maine law review cover vol 65.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 13:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Could also be replaced by the logo of the university, which would be a PD-simple file FASTILY 08:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How does this fail NFCC#8? Is this not precisely WP:NFCI§1 (foonote) and WP:NFC#Meeting the contextual significance criterion "to allow identification of music albums, books, etc., only an image of the front cover art of the object is normally used"? – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per my edit summary when I reverted its deletion from the infobox: "rv image change since the cover of a law review/journal passes WP:NFCC in the infobox of that law review/journal". A university logo is not an acceptable replacement for the cover image just as a band's logo would not be an acceptable replacement for an album cover for the album article. Aspects (talk) 01:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's small, distorted, and difficult to tell what it is. I do not see how this adds substantially to a reader's understanding of the article, or why a different freely licensed file could not confer a same, if not superior meaning -FASTILY 05:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem to fail WP:NFCC#8 in Maine Law Review. I'm not sure if the FUR contains everything required in a FUR, but that's another thing (which can also easily be fixed). --Stefan2 (talk) 09:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CUTANEOUS SUPPLY OF HAND.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader removed the self-claim and stated the image was copyright , giving "Instant Anatomy" as the Authour, which is confusing given that they claim 'own work' as source.

If this image is non-free, it's possibly replacable with an image that is known to be free. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daves-Picks-2016-Bonus-Disc.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8: redundant extra cover. Stefan2 (talk) 08:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – It's not redundant. It's the cover of the bonus disc that came with the album, and so it's appropriate -- and helpful to the reader -- to show it in the "extra album cover" part of the infobox. Furthermore the bonus disc cover is complimentary to the main album cover, as it comprises the lower half of the same illustration. This is in the article Dave's Picks Volume 18. — Mudwater^(Talk) 10:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The 'extra album cover' part of the infobox shouldn't contain a cover. One cover is enough to understand what product this is. Also note that the FUR is invalid as it doesn't describe how the image is used. For example, it says The image is used for identification in the context of critical commentary of the work for which it serves as cover art. but the image is not used in an article titled 'Dave's Picks Volume 18 Bonus Disc' as suggested by the FUR. It also says that The image is placed in the infobox at the top of the article discussing the work, to show the primary visual image associated with the work, and to help the user quickly identify the work and know they have found what they are looking for. but it is not 'at the top of the article' and if it is 'the primary visual image associated with the work', then why is there another image which is displayed more prominently than this image? --Stefan2 (talk) 10:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The 'extra album cover' part of the infobox shouldn't contain a cover? On the contrary, that's its explicit purpose. And it's used that way in many articles -- see for example Yesterday and Today. The image in question shows the primary visual image of the bonus disc, and as such it uniquely identifies it for the reader. Furthermore it's the infobox that's supposed to be at the top of the article, which it is. Yes, when two album covers are shown in the infobox, one is higher than the other, obviously. Clearly this image should be kept. — Mudwater^(Talk) 10:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the 'extra album cover' part of the infobox contains a non-free cover, use rationales need to be written to reflect this fact, and they should be judged by this fact. There are obvious NFCC#8 and NFCC#3 concerns for every extra non-free image that is used in addition to one used as a primary means of identification. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I found no sources discussing the artwork of the bonus CD package. Nice artwork, but images lacking significant coverage should be deleted. This is no exception. George Ho (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Computer Center NIT Hamirpur.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain rationale. Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Library NITH.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain rationale. Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sports Ground NITH.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain rationale. Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ECE Department, NIT Hamirpur 2015.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain rationale. Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CSE Dept. NITH.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain rationale. Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NBH NIT Hamirpur 2015.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain rationale. Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NITH Admin Block View 2008.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain rationale. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1976 Wills Cup Grand Final.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain rationale. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Colorado Springs Shield.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 02:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain rationale. Stefan2 (talk) 16:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The City of Colorado Springs does not have a "official city seal" per se. The shield posted is used to identify all official city property including parks, public buildings, city vehicles, etc. It is listed in the public domain where numerous examples can be found, one particular is located at: http://www.springsgov.com/units/cityclerk/clerkdocs/GetDoc.asp?DocID=37585&Show. Should removal for improper usage be necessary, I yield without argument. Sole attempt was for content improvement. Thank you, kar54. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kar54 (talk • contribs) 2016-05-10T20:12:14‎

That page doesn't contain any evidence that this file is in the public domain. In fact, the page states exactly the opposite. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:18, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Colored print from the book Georgian Architecture by G.Gagarin (photo of).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain rationale. The quoted law doesn't say that photos of buildings are in the public domain, only that you can use photos of buildings for non-commercial purposes without having to ask for permission from the architect. Stefan2 (talk) 16:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daraa Military Council Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence provided that logos like this are 'official item[s] legally exempt from copyright in [the] country of origin'. Stefan2 (talk) 16:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'd normally say keep as a nonfree logo for the infobox, but none of these have sources to confirm that they are in fact the logos of the respective organizations. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Islamic Dawn Movement of the Levant Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence provided that logos like this are 'official item[s] legally exempt from copyright in [the] country of origin'. Stefan2 (talk) 16:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'd normally say keep as a nonfree logo for the infobox, but none of these have sources to confirm that they are in fact the logos of the respective organizations. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Army of Aleppo Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence provided that logos like this are 'official item[s] legally exempt from copyright in [the] country of origin'. Also, the flag is too complex for PD-textlogo. Stefan2 (talk) 16:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'd normally say keep as a nonfree logo for the infobox, but none of these have sources to confirm that they are in fact the logos of the respective organizations. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1st Artillery Regiment Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence provided that logos like this are 'official item[s] legally exempt from copyright in [the] country of origin'. Stefan2 (talk) 16:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'd normally say keep as a nonfree logo for the infobox, but none of these have sources to confirm that they are in fact the logos of the respective organizations. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:First Army Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence provided that logos like this are 'official item[s] legally exempt from copyright in [the] country of origin'. Stefan2 (talk) 16:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. @Stefan2: If you want to pursue the task, there are hundreds upon hundreds of "own work" logos of insurgent groups. It's possible that Wikipedia is very popular with terrorists/freedom fighters, and the OTRS emails needed to confirm "own work" status will become the most valuable intelligence resource NSA ever had. But it's more likely that none of it is "own work" of uploaders. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:05, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'd normally say keep as a nonfree logo for the infobox, but none of these have sources to confirm that they are in fact the logos of the respective organizations. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Liwa Ahrar Souriya Flag.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence provided that logos like this are 'official item[s] legally exempt from copyright in [the] country of origin'. Stefan2 (talk) 16:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'd normally say keep as a nonfree logo for the infobox, but none of these have sources to confirm that they are in fact the logos of the respective organizations. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Northern Storm Brigade Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence provided that logos like this are 'official item[s] legally exempt from copyright in [the] country of origin'. Stefan2 (talk) 16:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'd normally say keep as a nonfree logo for the infobox, but none of these have sources to confirm that they are in fact the logos of the respective organizations. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Food court's entrance after renovations.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Plaza del Norte food court.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tren Urbano.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced to Skyskrapercity. No evidence that the uploader is the same person as the Skyskrapercity user (who has a completely different user name). Stefan2 (talk) 16:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:City of San Juan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced to Skyskrapercity. No evidence that the uploader is the same person as the Skyskrapercity user (who has a completely different user name). Stefan2 (talk) 16:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:First page of WPTAS form.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Second page of PTA form.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimma University Airport.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimma Airport.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jeremy Brett in Eton Uniform.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimma University Offices.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimma University Class Room Buildings.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. It takes too long to find the image on the linked page, so I'm not sure what copyright tag the Flickr source uses. Stefan2 (talk) 16:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimma University Front Offices.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JU Doctoral Graduation.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JUCAVM Laboratory.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimma University College of Agriculture.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimma University Teaching Hospital.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Royal Order of The Engabu, Sash & Breast star.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Royal Order of The Engabu.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 18:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:De fut diploma.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 18:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Omujwaara pic.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a derivative work. Stefan2 (talk) 18:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Madwurmz2005.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan (likely since 2012), and obsolete by File:Madwurmz2007.png. Likely uploaded for use on User:Madwurmz, recently deleted under CSD#U5, WP is not a Webhost. ★ Bigr Tex 19:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Madwurmz2007.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, uploaded for use on User:Madwurmz, recently deleted under CSD#U5, WP is not a Webhost. ★ Bigr Tex 19:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Madwurmz2005.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, uploaded for use on User:Madwurmz, recently deleted under CSD#U5, WP is not a Webhost. ★ Bigr Tex 19:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:La Crosse Mayor.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lake Sept '07 212.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lakeside Academy Logo.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused old logo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LaloFromChicago.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lamborghini Boyz pic2.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lamborghini Boyz.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lame ui example 2.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused old screenshot. Cloudbound (talk) 21:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lampford-Teatime.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LanceUppercut.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LaNicoya.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Larryg.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lase The White FACE.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Larrylevinson 01.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot. Cloudbound (talk) 21:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Last 2 Left Logo September 2006.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lastu.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LastCallGamesLogo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LastCallGamesSS.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot. Cloudbound (talk) 21:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LaurenceS Design for Wikipedia.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused old screenshot. Cloudbound (talk) 21:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LAW logo sm.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lawler 1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Le Likes logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lepers Produtcions Logo .jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lewis & clark 3 0002.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Liatilogo.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.