Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 March 17

< March 16	March 18 >

March 17[edit]

File:Pfoa.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality: badJPG; better alternatives available, e.g. File:Perfluorooctanoic acid.png or File:Perfluorooctanoic acid.svg. Leyo 00:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Reh man 05:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brahmotsavam Tamil poster.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from File talk:Brahmotsavam Tamil poster.jpg

Keep it. Hi to everyone, I think this image is necessary for the film page Brahmotshavam. Because the film is made bilingual. So I think as long as we don't cover up the page with an English version of poster (see Baahubali), it's better to keep both of the film posters. Yeah, I know the picture doesn't seem to fit into the license frame but if we look over to the Telugu version then it's to be also deleted. I hope I didn't irritate anyone. Kinda regards Luigi Boy ルアイヂボイ^talk 21:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8 since the article's infobox already has a theatrical poster. Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But the infobox has got only the Telugu version. And yeah, we can say there lot of other posters which could be also uploaded. I think for a completion it's sitll better to keep both of the posters because both are showing the title in respective languages. I think this solution would be even nice if we could switch with a button to Telugu resp. Tamil one. See this page's infobox of the character. We can simply switch from manga to anime. http://de.narutopedia.eu/wiki/Obito_Uchiha Luigi Boy ルアイヂボイ^talk 22:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The information that there are multiple versions is replaceable by text. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per Steel and Stefan. Reh man 05:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LensClockSF.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused locally, superior version available: File:LensClockSF.svg FASTILY 06:45, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; the svg version is superior in quality. --Srleffler (talk) 17:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Reh man 05:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MILFflag.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, better version available: File:Flag of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front.svg FASTILY 06:49, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I was going to vote delete, but then I noticed that the sword is flipped, and the calligraphy is different. Hence leaning towards a keep here. Reh man 05:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:351px-Habanero closeupA.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting nomination from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/File:351px-Habanero closeupA.jpg: Digitally alternate image of image and it does not have EV by ~AntanO4task. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Only the preview version of File:Habanero closeup.jpg was edited, not the full size. --Leyo 19:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Multidimensional Spreadsheet.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image violates WP:NFCC on several accounts. First, it is used on two articles, without adequate rationale for both. Second, it is replaceable by File:Multidimensional Modeling.png. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PaulRoma1994Cropped.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Distorted grainy crop of File:Paul Roma 1994.jpg FASTILY 09:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:James wardell.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, not encyclopedic, no foreseeable use FASTILY 10:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-encyclopaedic. Reh man 15:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mpbhartidayal.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a picture of the artwork, which is not allowed by Wikipedia image policy. Perhaps it should be relisted as Fair Use? Yoninah (talk) 16:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No information about previous publication, so not really appropriate under fair use either (WP:NFCC). Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for no evidence of meeting WP:NFCC#4 – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mary Josephine 'Min' Ryan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: SPeedy delete G7 Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out there is a version of this on Commons which I hadn't spotted. This is now an Orphan file. ☕ Antiqueight ^haver 18:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Antiqueight: Next time, just place a {{db-author}} tag on the page (listed as "G7" on Twinkle's "CSD" tab.) I went ahead and placed the tag. Steel1943 (talk) 19:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Steel1943I should have thought of that. I didn't - so thank you. ☕ Antiqueight ^haver 20:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tbd.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of which the subject cannot be ascertained - no evidence in the (visible) editing history of the uploader. Also shadowing a Commons redirect. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-encyclopaedic. Reh man 15:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:USAFA Band logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, bad file format. File:USAFA Band Logo.png is better. Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. PNG is better. Reh man 15:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.