Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 15

< July 14	July 16 >

July 15[edit]

File:Amherst Area Chamber of Commerce Logo.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by version in a superior format and without artifacts at File:Amherst Area Chamber of Commerce Logo.png. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spy-Fi artwork.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. There was an insufficient argument made that the use of this image was justified in accordance to WP:NFCC, particularly point 8. Those in favor did not properly argue how the omission of this image would be detrimental to the understanding of the article. — ξ ^xplicit 04:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a copyrighted film poster being used as the primary means of identification for a genre of film, and not the specific film itself. Lacks contextual significance and is decorative. Fails WP:NFCC#8 Whpq (talk) 15:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No this is a CD cover, not a film poster. The CD cover paints an image of the subgenre as a whole I never used fan films because it originates in professional works, not with the fans. I never uploaded the audio tracks, just a cover art to identity the subgenre. If I uploaded any spy-fi movie poster, it would be only that film. This image shows the subgenre as a whole, not any particular film.--Taeyebaar (talk) 14:01, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Taeyebaar. The image is used to illustrate a subgenre. The image is not a movie poster and it is not being used to identify any film. Caden ^cool 21:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Apologies for mixing up a film poster / CD cover but that doesn't affect the deletion nomination rationale. As for your explanation, simply using the "image is used to illustrate a subgenre" indicates that that is is being used decoratively as borne out by the lack of sourced commentary about the image. -- Whpq (talk) 04:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NFCCP#8 ("Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.") ★ Bigr Tex 02:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξ ^xplicit 03:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Not being used according to rationale ("to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question") and fails WP:NFCC8 – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Associação Académico 83 do Porto Inglês (logo).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Historic logo of Académico 83 do Porto Inglês, claimed as {{GFDL-self}}. If uploader is copyright holder, then image should go through WP:IOWN process; Otherwise, it's a non-free logo being used in a gallery without critical commentary and should be deleted under WP:NFCCP#8. ★ Bigr Tex 22:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A83 New logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. — ξ ^xplicit 04:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Current logo of Académico 83 do Porto Inglês, claimed as {{GFDL-self}}. If uploader is copyright holder, then image should go through WP:IOWN process; Otherwise, it's a non-free logo and will need an updated license and a rationale and should only be used in the infobox of the main article about the club. ★ Bigr Tex 22:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.