Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 November 11

< November 10	November 12 >

November 11

File:Eddiebrocktthree.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a user-created montage of three separate images. No sources are given for the images other than Wikipedia articles. Seems to be an attempt to compare and contrast how the character appears in three different TV shows/films, but this is not the subject of sourced commentary within the article itself so not sure if this use satisfies WP:NFCC#8. - Marchjuly (talk) 07:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Non-free content review.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 00:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to fail WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFG. Showing how the character looks would be appropriate in the articles about the respective products, but those articles already contain different pictures which show what the character looks like. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:06, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Images on Sandman (Marvel Comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete one and Keep the other. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Two more images being used in Sandman (Marvel Comics). Neither image is the subject of any critical commentary within the article and each seems to have been added for decorative reasons.- Marchjuly (talk) 07:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Non-free content review.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the Competition image. Its rational is of the episode page where it has commentary. Just take it off the Sandman article. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 01:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine with me. My concerns are with the way the image is being used in the character's article and not in the episode's article. Image has no nfur for "Sandman" so it simply be removed per WP:NFCC#10c as it is. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3-brand.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is being used in Three Ireland, Hutchison 3G and Three UK. Image has a non-free use rationale for each article and each company is stated to be subsidiary of the Hutchison Whampoa. Image appears to be shared by all three companies, but slightly different versions of the image can be found on the relevant official websites (Three Ireland, Hutchinson 3G and Three UK). Does No. 17 of Wp:NFC#UUI apply here and should the website logs be used instead? - Marchjuly (talk) 08:17, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Non-free content review.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 00:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hypodermic needle bevels.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file. Original uploader, now blocked, claims to represent an organization, not sure if this is the case. Kelly ^hi! 00:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:30th anniversary badge best.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is used in Fairbairn College#30th Anniversary. Not sure if use satisfies WP:NFCC#8 since the only statement regarding the image is unsourced and simply says "A special lapel badge, seen alongside, was presented to every learner and educator to be worn during the anniversary year." - Marchjuly (talk) 01:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Non-free content review.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 00:22, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:37 Armd Engr Sqn Noddy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is licensed as non-free and is being used in 37 Armoured Engineer Squadron. No source is listed for the image and I tried searching online, but I was only able to find this webpage which does not look to be an official website of either the unit or the British Army. Is the above website OK to use as the source of the image or should the image be tagged as {{di-no source}}.

Are military unit logos like this generally considered non-free or do they qualify as public domain? I've come across a few similar images which lack any source information other than to say, for example, "British Army" or "44 Regiment", etc. Sometimes I am able to find an official page where the image is used, but sometimes I am only able to find blogs or forum pages where the image is used. How should such images be dealt with per Wp:NFCC#10a? - Marchjuly (talk) 01:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Non-free content review.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 00:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ICMGNT.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graph. Kelly ^hi! 01:46, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Inkstorm In Action.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused GIF. Kelly ^hi! 02:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wp-fork.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, and use off-project seems unlikely. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Markup.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per note on file - "Admins feel free to delete after 1st December 2014." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm I have no issue with the deletion of this file: it was merely to illustrate a temporary problem affecting Wiki markup which has now been solved. Daveosaurus (talk) 17:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Windjammer2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"The stated source, http://schooner-adventure.org/, has an explicit copyright notice. While this might be OK on WP:EN as fair use, it is not acceptable on Commons." - What's the license as the file is not currently tagged? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hersehy Bears Hockey Club Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Admin: This non-free file can be DELETED because I uploaded it with the wrong name (Hershey misspelled) and a new one with the correct name was uploaded as a separate file to replace it.) Centpacrr (talk) 22:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)" Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously non-free, so I added {{non-free logo}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for this file (which I had posted) to be deleted because "Hershey" is spelled incorrectly ("Hersehy") ... Another copy exists and is in use with the name spelled correctly. This one is orphaned and can be deleted. Centpacrr (talk) 19:54, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The correctly spelled file is File:Hershey Bears Hockey Club Logo (2011).jpg which doesn't have the same colour though. Which is the correct colour, Centpacrr?Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SilverFast DC Pro.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here we go again. For all intents and purposes, this image has the some general purpose as the one at Commons, but there are not identical and hence the image wasn't deleteable under F8. Bringing it here. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The difference lies in the language and the flower. I wonder if in this case having both images on Commons would be good, the Commons image being a screenshot of a German language software.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prince-harry-to-meet-with-munjed-al-muderis-whose-pioneering-surgery-is-helping-uk-soldiers-walk-again.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, an image of the meeting is not necessary for the reader to be able to understand that it occured. January (talk) 17:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Banyan Tree (Shiv Bajrang Dham Kishunpur) close Focus.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈^(discuss) 13:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has no licence tag, and it's not clear if the links given are a source or supporting reference. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:AGF. User:Teacher1943's name aligns with the Twitter account, and he attempted to mark it as his own work with a CC-BY-SA license. - Eureka Lott 19:42, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir,It is my own work hence not need any lisence,I can reload this view.Nagric (talk)Teacher1943 —Preceding undated comment added 03:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Dear sir ,I have uploaded new version of this fileNagric (talk)Nagric —Preceding undated comment added 04:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: WP:NOTIMAGE says: "Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files". Is this image being used in any articles? Does it have any encyclopedic value? If this is "own work" with a CC-BY-SA, then it should be on Commons instead, shouldn't it? -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Files like this should ideally be on Commons, but that's not the point here. It can stay on Wikipedia until someone copies it there. Also note that there are two different files under the same name. Those would have to be uploaded to Commons under different names. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep CC-BY-SA 3.0 is mentioned somewhere in the history of the page. The uploader claims to be the photographer on this page. The metadata tells that the picture was taken on the date it was uploaded, but pictures taken from elsewhere are typically significantly older at the point when the file is uploaded to Wikipedia. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Template Russian ruble in currency table.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Jenks24 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"OK TO DELETE THIS FILE. I MISUNDERSTOOD THE INTENDED USE OF Template:Russian ruble AND THIS FILE IS NOT NEEDED. --Thnidu (talk) 02:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)" Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as G7, not seeing a reason to keep this file now.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MoreDieofHeartbreakCoverart.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged, I'm willing to assume good faith, but the actual cover art is attributed to a third party (other than the uploader). OTRS confirmation required? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected - File:MoreDieofHeartbreakCoverart2.jpeg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emibai Jinnah2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is claimed as own work, but a google+ page is listed is maintained by Farooq Hayat, who is not necessarily the same person. There is no indication the image is released under a 'free' license on the source given. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.