Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 May 22
May 22
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:Mariah Carey Butterfly image.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Petergriffin9901 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8 no contextual significance as well as easily replaceable by words (Carey peering through a dirty window). Does not require a non-free image —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 09:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:Mariah-carey-the-roof.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Petergriffin9901 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8 no contextual significance as well as easily replaceable by words. Does not require a non-free image —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 09:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:BudPoile.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Graeme08 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Obsolete. There are two free images of this person on Commons. Also, images of Hockey Hall of Fame plaques have been deleted in the past because "Canadian freedom of panorama applies to 3D works only, not 2D", see this and this. Parkfly20 (talk) 13:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:Brother bear 2 005.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jason Palpatine (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The screenshot is used in the plot section of Brother Bear 2 against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself. There is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 22:20, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- From past experience, I KNOW how this will turn out, so anything I say will mean nothing to any of you so why should I say anything at all? Already more than HALF of the images I had uploaded to Wikipedia have been deleted -- including the very first image I ever contributed. Given past history, and what I already KNOW is going to come about, I see there to be no reason for discussion or delay. I was the uploader of this file, and I say GO AHEAD AND DELETE IT RIGHT NOW! -- Jason Palpatine (talk) 00:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
This User fails to understand Wikipedia's Systematized Logistical Projection of its Balanced Policy Contingency. (speak your mind | contributions) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:Brother Bear 09.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jason Palpatine (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The screenshot is used in the plot section of Brother Bear against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself. There is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 22:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- From past experience, I KNOW how this will turn out, so anything I say will mean nothing to any of you so why should I say anything at all? Already more than HALF of the images I had uploaded to Wikipedia have been deleted -- including the very first image I ever contributed. Given past history, and what I already KNOW is going to come about, I see there to be no reason for discussion or delay. I was the uploader of this file, and I say GO AHEAD AND DELETE IT RIGHT NOW! -- Jason Palpatine (talk) 00:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC) This User fails to understand Wikipedia's Systematized Logistical Projection of its Balanced Policy Contingency. (speak your mind | contributions)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.