Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 June 6

< June 5	June 7 >

June 6[edit]

File:SC blank.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PNG superseded by SVG File:SC-blank-wide.svg on Commons. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 02:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TN blank.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PNG superseded by SVG File:Secondary Tennessee Blank.svg on Commons. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 02:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UWTLogo2014.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logo, only use was in a promotional article which has now been deleted. Unused. K7L (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kim Taeyeon, Golden Disk Award, Jan 2014.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with properly named File:Kim Taeyeon, Golden Disk Awards, Jan 2014.jpg Hermittons (talk) 06:29, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:King kkmirza.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No description, seemingly used to support an article under BLP concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cricket positions 300px enhanced.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lo res image, seemingly unused, should be SVG. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LilydaleLine.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lo qulaity raster , route diagram. Should be SVG at least. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, totally unneeded. Superseded by route diagram templates. — This, that and the other (talk) 02:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NewG and b.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lo res, unused image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rendering of New Atlanta Braves Stadium.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A re-upload of File:New Braves Stadium Rendering.jpg, which was deleted because it failed WP:NFCC#8, as the article is not "dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work" (i.e. the article is not about the stadium rendering). There is already a rendering of the stadium in the article body in context. Mosmof (talk) 15:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If one file is acceptable then the other file should be deleted. Would that be acceptable? If that is okay I'll delete the other rendering.Nemov (talk) 16:15, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the other image is in context of discussing the stadium and the retail complex are combined. I don't think this one gives us the same information. Mosmof (talk) 17:03, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Is it an issue if I use the 3D image twice? It would be good for the page to have an image of the design on the top of the page. If it can only be used once I'll move it up top.Nemov (talk) 18:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the PR person with the Braves organization in regards to the free use of this file. They are supposed to contact me with further information soon.Nemov (talk) 19:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:User-Dmehus.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:26, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NewG and b.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low res raster image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:29, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:South sydney rabbitohs logo 1988.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8: former logo which is very similar to the current one. Stefan2 (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really such a problem? It's not a duplication of the same logo. It shows an evolution of the logo. Most clubs' logos have changed altogether, others have retained the retro look.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 00:13, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It's fairly common practice for former logos to be displayed in the history section of sports club articles, even if they happen to be quite similar. J Mo 101 (talk) 16:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not. There needs to be sourced critical discussion about former logos, or else they violate WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the two logos are very similar and the small differences can be adequately covered with text alone. - Peripitus (Talk) 04:32, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Awakening The Sunhook Spire Logo, by Boomzap Entertainment.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted - as failing to meet the criteria for non-free images in list articles. We don't use non-free images to simply identify things - Peripitus (Talk) 04:28, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFLISTS. Stefan2 (talk) 21:03, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File is still being used at Awakening (game series) to identify the 5th game in the series Monikazapper (talk) 06:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adam's Natal Chart (Final).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:18, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.