Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 February 16

< February 15	February 17 >

February 16[edit]

File:"Crazy for You" (Remix) 1991 single by Madonna.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a cover of single-market's (U.K.) re-released remix song, not the actual original cover art, hence it fails WP:NFCC#3a. It also fails WP:NFCC#8, as its omission would not decrease readers' understanding of the article topic. Bluesatellite (talk) 02:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Per nomination rationale. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:"Holiday" (1991) single artwork by Madonna.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a cover of single-market's (U.K.) re-released song, not the actual original cover art, hence it fails WP:NFCC#3a. It also fails WP:NFCC#8, as its omission would not decrease "readers' understanding of the article topic." Bluesatellite (talk) 03:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Per nomination rationale. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WiX logo.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:WiX logo.png, which is hosted on Commons, has an unambiguous free license, and is in the superior PNG format. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 08:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Uploads by User:Sirasith[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted - per the below links there appears evidence that some of the images are not the uploader's own original photo - Peripitus (Talk) 22:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:BigCextraLadprao.jpg[edit]

User's uploads have dubious own-work claims. Almost all lack EXIF data, and many can be found via Google Image search to be copyright violations. Paul_012 (talk) 10:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC) Also nominated:[reply]

File:BigCMarketNewFacadeStore.jpg
File:BigCJumboNavanakhon.jpg
File:BigCAngthong.jpg
File:BigCPureChumphon.jpg
File:CentralFestivalChiangMai.jpg
File:CPNmall4Places.jpg
File:BaanAndBeyondKhonkaen.jpg
File:CentralFestivalHatYai.jpg
File:IllumDepartmentStore.jpg
File:CentralDepartmentStoreChitlom.jpg
File:CentralFestivalPhuket.jpg
File:CentralDepartmentStoreCFHatYai01.jpg
File:CentralDepartmentStoreChitlom01.jpg
File:CentralDepartmentStoreCFHatYai02.jpg
File:CentralDepartmentStoreChitlom02.jpg
File:CentralDepartmentStoreChitlom03.jpg
File:CentralDepartmentStoreHangzhou.jpg
File:CentralDepartmentStoreShenyang.jpg
File:CentralDepartmentStoreCFPattayaBeach.jpg
File:CentralDepartmentStoreNewSilomComplex.jpg
File:CentralDepartmentStoreCFPattayaBeach01.jpg

--Paul_012 (talk) 10:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give examples of where you have matches via google search ? I've looked briefly and found nothing. Lack of exif is not an issue - many appear edited to 800x600 for upload and some software strips the exif. Why are the claims of own work dubious ? - Peripitus (Talk) 11:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know what examples the nominator had, but here are some:

File:BigCMarketNewFacadeStore.jpg: Image looks upscaled and possibly scanned. Uploaded in 2013. There is a lower resolution copy here (lower resolution = not upscaled?) dated 2555. According to Thai solar calendar, you should subtract 543 from the year to convert it, giving 2012 which is earlier than our upload.
File:BigCJumboNavanakhon.jpg: Is this the same photo, but cropped and rotated? Neither can be the original, as our picture has a higher resolution.
File:CPNmall4Places.jpg: Gallery of four images. The top-left one appears to come from here and was later uploaded as Commons:File:NewsUpdateThumb 1010. changwattana.jpg (now tagged as "no permission" on Commons). I haven't searched for the other ones.
File:BaanAndBeyondKhonkaen.jpg: Also here but our copy seems to be earlier.
File:IllumDepartmentStore.jpg: Crop of this? --Stefan2 (talk) 00:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2's above examples pretty much describe what I found. The uploader has responded on my talk page. Quote follows. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many People use my photos from my posts in Thailand SSC group, secret group in Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/groups/SSCthailand/). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirasith (talk • contribs) 17:25, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Uploads by User:Novickas[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: These have apparently been deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kestutis nakas.jpg
File:Vytautas Kavolis 02.jpg
File:Griffith Buck Rose Prairie Sunset.jpg

I obtained these images via email requests, but at the time I didn’t understand the WP licensing conditions, in fact didn't mention those at all, and so they didn’t give informed consent. Novickas (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:First released version of I Love Rock N Roll in 1975.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons has a rule for images with OTRS tickets, if they don't receive an e-mail in 1 month, the image will be nominated for deletion. There has been more than three months and no information has been given by OTRS. Per template itself: "If an email cannot be found in the OTRS system, the content may be deleted for lack of valid licensing information." © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 22:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I searched OTRS and I can't find any mention of the file. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Useless image: even if it could be treated as a free image, it doesn't convey any useful information.—Kww(talk) 04:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JeffKussman.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Jeff Kussman) Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JeffLett.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, likely copyvio - credited to two different photographers, and a cropped version is used in artist's official twitter https://twitter.com/jefflett_ Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:14, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jefflove.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rule (2nd nomination)) Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jeffrey d rothstein.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (User:Alscenter, deleted as advertising) Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fiesta logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (User:Alscenter, deleted as advertising) Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Group2 scientists rgb 500pix.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (User:Alscenter, deleted as advertising) Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Symp 3-04 500pix.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (User:Alscenter, deleted as advertising) Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.