Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 February 15

< February 14	February 16 >

February 15[edit]

File:New SDJ Author Photo.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unlinked image, low resolution, low quality. Book author Sanaa Lathan does not appear to have an article on Wikipedia, the link in the image summary is for an actor. Cube00 (talk) 06:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sister Wendy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clipped from the cover of a book which is mentioned, but not discussed, in the article where it is used, Sister Wendy. In practice it is being used as a headshot, but would fail WP:NFC#UUI because she is a living person. William Avery (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Former USMC Rifle Marksmanship Badges.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - PD released derivative of a PD work - Peripitus (Talk) 04:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See OTRS Ticket#2012061910006934 by web site owner - claimed derivative of http://usarmyinsigniahomepage.co.nf/spec_wwi.html Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC

This claim is incorrect. Historical badges, such as these, should be similar in appearance to be historically accurate, but these drawing of these U.S. military badges are of my own work. A visual inspection of the differences between the website's graphics and my drawing should be proof enough to settle this claim. --McChizzle (talk) 20:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The PD works from which this is derived are clearly indicated on the image page. There are a number of points where the derivation is clearly from those, and not the supposed source cited by the complainant. Look for instance at the bottom of the wreath on the Expert Rifleman badge. William Avery (talk) 10:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To help the situation, I started over and created new graphics based on other images on the Internet and enhanced the text for better viewing at low-resolution. --McChizzle (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

comment See also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Confederate_States_of_America_First_Lieutenant-Artillery.jpg on same OTRS ticket (and there were 5 more similar on commons) Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ronhjones, I'm very confused, what does that have to do with the above? All I see is a deleted page with no information. --McChizzle (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Former US Army Pistol Marksmanship Badges.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept as per the previous image - Peripitus (Talk) 04:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See OTRS Ticket#2012061910006934 by web site owner - claimed derivative of http://usarmyinsigniahomepage.co.nf/spec_wwi.html Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This claim is incorrect. Historical badges, such as these, should be similar in appearance to be historically accurate, but these drawing of these U.S. military badges are of my own work. A visual inspection of the differences between the website's graphics and my drawing should be proof enough to settle this claim. --McChizzle (talk) 20:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To help the situation, I started over and created new graphics based on other images on the Internet and enhanced the text for better viewing at low-resolution. --McChizzle (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

comment See also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Confederate_States_of_America_First_Lieutenant-Artillery.jpg on same OTRS ticket (and there were 5 more similar) Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ronhjones, I'm very confused, what does that have to do with the above? All I see is a deleted page with no information. --McChizzle (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Large 0910 large.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed file; per uploader's request. Toa Nidhiki05 21:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ausurugby.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic image with all rugby players out of focus. Does not illustrate anything relevant to University of Aberdeen sports as the background is the focal point -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Citytraininfobox.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image, no encyclopedic value. May have once been a proposed example for an infobox image, but no longer necessary -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Citytraininfobox1.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image, no encyclopedic value. May have once been a proposed example for an infobox image, but no longer necessary -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Citytraininfobox2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image, no encyclopedic value. May have once been a proposed example for an infobox image, but no longer necessary -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Citytraininfobox1.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image, no encyclopedic value. May have once been a proposed example for an infobox image, but no longer necessary -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Citytraininfobox4.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image, no encyclopedic value. May have once been a proposed example for an infobox image, but no longer necessary -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Citytraininfobox3.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image, no encyclopedic value. May have once been a proposed example for an infobox image, but no longer necessary -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.