Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 December 31

< December 30	January 1 >

December 31[edit]

File:Sensei X2 Robotic System.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More than 30 days without permission via OTRS. Green Giant (talk) 00:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Magellan Robotic System.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More than 30 days without permission via OTRS. Green Giant (talk) 00:20, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hansen Medical building.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More than 30 days without permission via OTRS. Green Giant (talk) 00:21, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ankokuji-ekei.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image does not appear to be the original uploader's own work, as they label it as a contemporary portrait of the subject, and date the image to 1665. However, without source information, we are unable to verify that the image is in the public domain, or even whether or not the subject of the portrait is correctly identified. Diannaa (talk) 02:26, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jericho941.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear if uploader is the photographer Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimlarue.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Jimi tolliver), likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:42, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimjuddfootball.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic [1] Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:44, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimi Diggin20.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (used only on userpage deleted as copyvio -- so possible copyvio as well) Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:46, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimfurl.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:46, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JimFarmer.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:47, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JimBorkowskiHeadShot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James W. Borkowski) Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JimBoPutnam.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James W. Borkowski) Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JimBoPolice.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James W. Borkowski) Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimboo.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimbo Wales Season's Greetings.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. BTW The original source image is File:Jimbo Wales in France cropped.jpg. - Peripitus (Talk) 09:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no source for base image Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jim poulette.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jim reforma.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jim Ret2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Rettew) Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jim Rettew.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Rettew) Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jim Wolf - flower.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Jim Wolf (musician) ) Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jim-Jonsin-Press.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, likely copyright violation Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:55, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jim-levenstein.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimbo modified.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no source for base image Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; not sure what the purpose of the image is anyway, and the quality of the edit is not very convincing. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if the uploader wasn't blocked for sockpuppetry, I can't even imagine a scenario where this image would be useful in any article. Tutelary (talk) 00:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Super Smash Bros for Wii U Box Art.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn is more accurate here than kept - Peripitus (Talk) 22:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So we have (1) two games that incorporate their difference in platform into the title itself [...for 3DS] [...for Wii U], plus (2) the usual similar artwork we see in multiplatform releases like this. Its because of point 1 I am a bit concerned with removing either or artwork. Despite that, I disagree with the "covers themselves vary greatly" to the point one or the other cannot be sufficiently covered in text if removed. WP:NFCC, 3a and 8.

A small discussion started here. « Ryūkotsusei » 03:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Or you could let it be. The article's title that it's using it for is Super_Smash_Bros._for_Nintendo_3DS_and_Wii_U, which has two main topics and was likely the result of a merger. Since it's two main topics, the usual norm of one NFCC for article is moved to two, since it's two main topics. Plus, if you remove one but not the other, it's going to have WP:DUE weight towards that one specific image. And do tell me how you could adequately represent the other cover via text....seriously, I don't see that happening. Tutelary (talk) 04:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For those at the VG project specifically, should this particular instance be the exception to the first sentence of WP:VGBOX? « Ryūkotsusei » 06:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

This situation is more similar to The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons and Oracle of Ages and Link: The Faces of Evil and Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon (as has been pointed out before). These two articles handle the issue differently from eachother, so they don't help much. In this case, however, having both box arts also looks more ugly than having only one, while in the CD-I games, having both box arts next to eachother still looks visually pleasing. If I had to pick one or the other, I think I'd keep the Wii U version in, though this kinda shows bias... ~Mable (chat) 08:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the reason for the different amount of box arts in these two articles is different. The Oracle games are technically separate games but they can linked together by a password system to achieve the true ending. I have often seen them considered a single entry. The CDI games were completely separate but merged. Also, regarding the previous post I see this a more like Pokemon (two versions of the same game). --69.157.253.160 (talk) 07:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've expressed this previously on the file's talk page, but I also believe that having both covers is appropriate for the article. (1) the two games are quite distinct from one another and can count as two separate topics (and not just ports), and (2) the covers themselves differ from each other quite a bit. I don't see how one cover could be chosen over the other. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not so sure about that most games that have remakes (and usually extra content) do not have a cover for both versions unless the remake is notable enough for a separate article. The only exception I can think of is the Wii port of Okami but that was due to critical content regarding the box art itself. The image for the box art was copyrighted by IGN with their watermark visible promoting Capcom to let owners to receive high-resolution replacement covers for free. Obviously the Wii U version of Smash Bros is not a remake but I believe that the situation is similar enough to be treated the same way. The only real question I see is, should we keep the 3DS on or the Wii U one?--69.157.253.160 (talk) 02:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should we just put it for a vote, to get a better idea of people's opinions? I think this is really just something to decide in a case-by-case basis. I myself would say keep Wii U version, weak keep 3DS version. Why I prefer the Wii U version over the 3DS version? Completely personal preference - I don't think either is more important, but the box-art looks nicer. ~Mable (chat) 12:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because of what you've said earlier about Zelda is also why I wanted a more thorough discussion. It seems this is as best as its going to get unfortunately, so this can be closed as keep. « Ryūkotsusei » 16:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Just for reference, the WikiProject was notified here, and as for this article being "the result of a merger", that split should've never happened. « Ryūkotsusei » 20:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.