Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 December 29

< December 28	December 30 >

December 29

File:Magadheera screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The film screenshot fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. The screenshot is being used in the plot section about the film and has a caption of "Kala Bhairava (Ram Charan) accepting the challenge by Sher Khan (Srihari) at Bhairavakona while Mithravinda (Kajal Aggarwal) looks on" which matches up with "They arrive shortly, and Sher Khan challenges Bhairava to battle his soldiers. Bhairava boldly accepts the challenge and kills a hundred soldiers, but is severely injured in the process." from the plot section. The screenshot is already replaced with words alone thereby failing WP:NFCC#1. The screenshot being located in the film's plot section goes against WP:FILMNFI in that "Since a film article's "Plot" section contains descriptive claims about the information found in the primary source (the film) and not information found in reliable sources regarding the film, the section is not considered critical commentary or discussion of film." even though the fair use rationale claims there is critical commentary. The fair use rationale shows that this image is being used for decorative purposes: "The plot section is quite long without images, a image would make it visually appealing." and "The Entire Plot section consisting of 4000 characters is without any images and looks quite odd. This will serve as a visual aid." The screenshot does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 01:16, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The scene is only mentioned in the plot, and it's notability is not proven in the article through reliable sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:36, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:South Alabama Jaguars Wordmark.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PD logo; PNG version located here: File:South Alabama Jaguars wordmark.png Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 02:16, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:USD Toreros logo basketball.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned PD logo; File:Sd toreros textlogo.png has replaced this .jpg version in all articles. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 02:54, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michael Brown Jr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - in answer to Stefan2's points, the image is well known and documented as being from the subject's facebook page (more original here) so does not belong to a commercial organisation so NFCC#2 and point 7 as listed don't apply - Peripitus (Talk) 10:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable Image Use Criteria #10. Unknown author, original source and date - does not satisfy image use requirements. Is not a historical photo of significant value. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:25, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It fully satisfies non-free image use, please see the Non-free use rationale listed, including: WP:NFCC#7, WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#3, WP:NFCC#4, and WP:NFCC#2. Also, the subject of the photograph has been deceased since: Aug 2014. The historical value is obvious given the massive coverage both nationally and internationally, the policing ramifications in the aftermath, and the debated it triggered. The photo with the headsets is iconic. - Cwobeel (talk) 15:28, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep I think the image does meet NFCC. This particular photo (as opposed to any other photo of Brown) is not of strong historical value or identification, but A photo of Brown is of value, and the NFCC criteria are met. The only one that is iffy is #8, but that would be true of all such photos. See similarly used photos in Shooting of Trayvon Martin and many other articles for precedent. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:15, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:NFCC#10 only requires that a source be provided and that "where possible ... information about the artist, publisher and copyright holder, and year of copyright" be included (emphasis added). The hyperlink provided satisfies that NFCC requirement. I agree with User:Cwobeel and User:Gaijin42 about this image's compliance with WP:NFCC#8. RJaguar3 | u | t 23:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Then specify how to verify whether WP:NFCC#2 is satisfied or not. In particular, how would you find out whether the image satisfies WP:NFC#UII §7? --Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:British Columbia Proclamation.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, a copyright violation. It's a relatively new painting, and Freedom of Panorama in Canada doesn't cover two-dimensional art. TheMightyQuill (talk) 06:32, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bill Haley Alan Freed Little Richard 1956 Columbia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No critical commentary. There are photos of both persons at Commons-not needed to identify deceased Alan Freed. We hope (talk) 14:33, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bill Haley Comets Ed Sullivan 1955.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No referenced critical commentary. These old episodes have apparently been re-discovered and copyrighted as of 2002. We hope (talk) 14:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bill Haley Little Richard Columbia 1956.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No cited critical commentary. There are free use photos of both people if identity is the issue. We hope (talk) 14:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bill Haley Comets Ed Sullivan 1957 Live.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No cited critical commentary; there are PD photos of the group at Commons. We hope (talk) 14:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rockclock3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No cited critical commentary--the article has a non free poster in the infobox for identification. We hope (talk) 14:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Little Richard Bill Haley 1956 Columbia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No cited critical commentary; there are PD photos of both people at Commons for identification purposes. We hope (talk) 14:55, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Don't Knock the Rock Bill Haley Alan Dale Alan Freed.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No cited critical commentary-no reason to include a non free UK lobby card. The article has a non-free card in its infobox for identification. We hope (talk) 14:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dontknock3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No cited critical commentary-article has a non-free lobby card in infobox for identification. We hope (talk) 15:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gerald McCoy 2014 season.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by January (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio - no evidence of permission at http://fanspeak.com/fsnfl/2014/10/31/nfl-weekly-transaction-tracker-74/ EricEnfermero (Talk) 15:40, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Domo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photograph of an unidentified person. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Domperidone.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. c:File:Domperidone.png and File:Domperidon.svg seem to show the same chemical structure. Stefan2 (talk) 16:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Doner.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 18:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Krishnakant Mishra at --Bandra--.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic. FDMS 4 18:02, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gautam Gulati.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Ponyo (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyright violation: Celeb shoot, larger version previously published here. FDMS 4 18:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Drawing.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dynkin diagram E8.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. File:Dynkin diagram E8.svg is better. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alliance College.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Would probably be deleted from commons, npd, small size, no exif, if scanned from a print would normally expect exif from the scanner, suspicion of copyfraud.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:53, 29 December 2014 (UTC) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:53, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Soongwanghwamun.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on page "We are reviewing RoK FoP rules with regard modern structures, and so far the consensus is that, modern structures cannot be hosted at Commons." ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.