Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 December 16

< December 15	December 17 >

December 16[edit]

File:Wlbt wdbd news.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative usage fails WP:NFCC#8. RJaguar3 | u | t 05:49, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

duplicate files[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: All tagged with appropriate tags. This should now be taken care of through WP:CSD. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a list of files that should be deleted because they are duplicate.With surrounding the finest and the worst --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this bad images --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:49, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Certifying compiler model.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete Kristianwlt (talk) 18:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SHGb02-14a.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Completely unnecessary non-free screenshot of a webpage reporting an event, used to illustrate the page about that event. damiens.rf 18:20, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Moondram Pirai Front Soundtrack Cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted. In answer to @Kailash29792:, yes. The general consensus here is that a separate article on an album is justified in having a single image of the album's cover, in some circumstances more images have been justified. - Peripitus (Talk) 07:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and MOS:FILM#Soundtrack. Stefan2 (talk) 23:50, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be saved if the soundtrack had a separate article? Kailash29792 (talk) 15:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]