Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 August 20

< August 19	August 21 >

August 20[edit]

File:Lehman Caves 016.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry, useless file. Not used in any articles. Safiel (talk) 00:38, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Witold Kieżun[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Unless consent is given, the images must be deleted. I've just checked the OTRS and no consent has been received. If and when consent is received, I will happily restore the images. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 00:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Witold Kieżun as a child.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Witold Kieżun 1950.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Witold Kieżun and Pope John Paul II, Burundi, 1991.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Witold and Danuta Kieżun, Warsaw, 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Witold Kieżun Postage Stamp 2014.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

We have several free photos of this person (see c:Category:Witold Kieżun), so per WP:NFCC#1, we don't need these unfree ones. There is no critical discussion about them, so they all violate WP:NFCC#8. The stamp is mentioned briefly, but is not needed for understanding the article. Some of the photos are also missing evidence of compliance with WP:NFCC#4. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

→Thanks Stefan2. All the pictures comply with WP:NFCC#4, as they're taken from the Jarocki (2013) book on the subject matter, or were published in a press release (stamp), that has been published. I think there is great informational and encyclopedic value to these pictures, as bc the person is 93 years old, illustrations from various decades help the reader understand the specific historical and cultural context of the facts described, the exising free pictures do not provide that. However, I am in the process of obtaining official confirmation for all the pictures used, and will update accordingly in a few days. Best KonradFunk (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys, me again. I just got official confirmation per email from the rights holder of all the pictures except the stamp, with the authorization to use them. As I am relatively new here, please let me know if this closes the matter, or the files need to be reclassified somehow, or anyone would want to see the email I received, if so, happy to provide. Best, KonradFunk (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The photographer should follow the instructions at WP:CONSENT. If the photographer is dead, the photographer's heir should do this instead. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it Polish stamps, as with other Polish images, are copyright for 70 years pma, so this new stamp is covered by that time frame and even a non-free claim for a stamp must comply with WP:NFCI #3 but it is identifying the subject of the stamp without any critical commentary about the stamp itself; a NFCC requirement. The fact that a stamp was issued can be clearly made in prose alone without using a non-free image or deminshing the reader's understanding of the article. ww2censor (talk) 20:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per User:KonradFunk, and please have the photographer comply with WP:CONSENT ASAP. XeroxKleenex (talk) 21:32, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, will do, and confirm once received in suggested form. KonradFunk (talk) 09:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AE Manacor.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC#8: former logo without critical discussion. Stefan2 (talk) 13:21, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jgfox cmu.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as WP:NFCC#4 is covered. TLSuda (talk) 00:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Missing evidence that WP:NFCC#4 is satisfied. Stefan2 (talk) 13:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i'm not sure where i was to learn about WP:NFCC -- it's not mentioned in any of the templates for non-free use, that i recall. but perhaps i misunderstood (or simply missed) one of the template directives. in any case, if it's just #4 that's at issue: this image was used, with CMU's permission, in Martinez' 2004 discussion of Fox's work. cite is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._G._Fox#cite_note-martinez-7 . since you may not have a copy of that paper (it's likely behind a scientific journal paywall, but wasn't previously), i can also point you to a russian translation of that paper: http://btr.nnov.ru/martinez.html . a google translation of that link will yield "Picture 4 John G. Fox (1916-1980). Courtesy of the Department of Physics at Carnegie Mellouna." [sic]. please advise on how i can label the image to avoid its deletion. Pgf (talk) 18:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

what do i need to do to remove this picture from the deletion list? Pgf (talk) 03:15, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i've edited the file info: filled in more of the "Information" and "Non-free use rationale biog" template fields, and identified the source publication in the Source: field. please let me know if this is sufficient. Pgf (talk) 13:01, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Uploader has now satisfied #4. XeroxKleenex (talk) 21:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wilke-Starification.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, subject is deceased. TLSuda (talk) 00:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free work of art being used actually to illustrate what a living person looks like. damiens.rf 14:09, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep NOT a living person, subject died in 1993. Therefore, not replaceable. XeroxKleenex (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Well said. I've missed that. --damiens.rf 13:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Provo2007.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file, no foreseeable use. Safiel (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Provo20071.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file, no foreseeable use. Safiel (talk) 16:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SSPX0234 edited-1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file, no foreseeable use. Safiel (talk) 16:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bindaas 2014 Movie Poster.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC#8 and MOS:FILM#Soundtrack. Stefan2 (talk) 18:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FutureSex LoveSounds (Deluxe).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: seems to be a non-notable extra edition. Stefan2 (talk) 20:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The News Quiz CD cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - significance. Image does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the The News Quiz, which is a radio programme not a CD. Visual identification is not relevant to a radio programme, and File:News Quiz Theme tune 280907.ogg provides more relevant audio identification. The CD pictured here is but one of several collections of episodes issued by the BBC, all with entirely different cover designs, and most listeners to the radio programme will not be familiar with any of them. If considered as an image of the programme participants it fails WP:NFCC#1 as freely-licensed images are available of at least five of the current regular participants, including three of the four in this image (Alan Coren, left, died in 2007), which is clearly a photomontage so a similar but more up to date composite image could be produced if really desired. Qwfp (talk) 20:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The 2020 Experience (Deluxe).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8: very similar to File:Justin Timberlake - The 2020 Experience.png. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TexaChapsLogo1971-73.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: former logo. Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As has already been noted on image, this is used to illustrate the history of this organization, and it is discussed in the article. It absolutely passes #8. XeroxKleenex (talk) 21:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Former logos may only be used if there is sourced critical discussion about the logo. This isn't the case here. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:00, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Strawberry Shortcake[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: One deleted and one moved to the appropriate article. TLSuda (talk) 00:26, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:K-strawberry234.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:StrawberryShortcake2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Per WP:NFCC#3a: the two extra images do not seem to provide anything in addition to the infobox image. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:StrawberryShortcake2009.jpg, I've moved it to the Strawberry Shortcake's Berry Bitty Adventures article, satisfies #3 when used there. XeroxKleenex (talk) 21:18, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uindy.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#10c and WP:NFC#UUI §17. The article in the FUR uses File:University of Indianapolis Official Seal.png instead. Stefan2 (talk) 20:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SanAntonioSpursABAlogo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: former logo. Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SanAntonioSpurs90slogo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: former logo. Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Saban 1993 logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: former logo not necessary for understanding the article. Stefan2 (talk) 20:59, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.