Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 October 2

< October 1	October 3 >

October 2[edit]

File:Zalgiris Kaunas (NBA 2K14).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't violate any non-free content criteria. It helps readers to know how the Žalgiris looks like in video game as it is the first time Žalgiris is featured in such a video game, so the image has decent extent of use, which means WP:NFCC#3b is not violated. Most of the readers will google it anyway after reading such line that Žalgiris is included in a video game, so WP:NFCC#8 is not violated as well as it "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic". --Pofka (talk) 18:45, 2 October 2013 (GMT +2)

The article isn't about the video game, and there is zero critical discussion about the video game in the article. Compare with MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCI §1 which tells that cover art normally isn't appropriate in articles about the people who have made a product. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Critical commentary is that Žalgiris was featured in such product for the first time in the club history. --Pofka (talk) 13:52, 3 October 2013 (GMT +2)

That doesn't require an image of the game. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic and most of readers would google it anyway. --Pofka (talk) 14:27, 4 October 2013 (GMT +2)

You forgot the second half of WP:NFCC#8: removal wouldn't be detrimental to the understanding of the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:22, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It would, because then readers would have to search for images by themselves. --Pofka (talk) 18:44, 5 October 2013 (GMT +2)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Birds of Prey promo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is already one piece of non-free media (the title card), so there is no justification for a second. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this file is used on multiple articles, not one article, there are multiple fair use justifications on the file page, not just one. -- 76.65.129.3 (talk) 06:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Same reasons stated above.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 09:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is in use in multiple articles, so a separate assessment needs to be made for each article.
1. Birds of Prey (TV series): Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8: redundant to the title card in the infobox, doesn't add anything to the article and isn't critically discussed.
2. Huntress (Helena Wayne): Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8: redundant to other images, no discussion about the cover, TV series barely mentioned. Other images also need to be deleted from the article for various reasons.
3. Huntress (comics): This article has too many images of the character, so some will have to be deleted, but it is unclear exactly which ones. For the moment, the article fails WP:NFCC#3a. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Whatever the outcomes of this discussion, the main page can use either the title card or the poster. It's up to you guys to pick. I think I'll nominate the poster (the official poster from The WB network) and the removal of the title card. Using the poster probably better than the title card anyway because the poster has much better resolution than a screen capture from a DVD.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 18:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete In Birds of Prey (TV series), the image fails WP:NFCC#3a in regards to the title card. In Huntress (comics), there is one paragraph about the TV show that does not justify the image there. In Huntress (Helena Wayne), there is only one sentence about the TV show that does not justify having the image located there. Aspects (talk) 09:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry, do you mean deleting this or the article itself?--NeoBatfreak (talk) 20:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.