Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 December 26

< December 25	December 27 >

December 26[edit]

File:Labor camp.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted - there is far too much doubt about the ownership of the copyright. If this can be sorted out sometime in the future then the image can be restored - Peripitus (Talk)

The OTRS ticket shows a forwarded email from an anonymous representative of the Jamestown Foundation stating merely, "You may use them if you cite them." First of all, there is no evidence that the Jamestown Foundation is the copyright holder of the painting. Secondly, that email isn't even close to meeting our standards for a free license release. Kaldari (talk) 03:23, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If so, this is all responsibility of the person who issued this OTRS ticket at Commons. This all should be decided on Commons. Unfortunately, I do not even have a permanent account out there. My very best wishes (talk) 06:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now, speaking about copyright status of the images of Getman paintings, they now also appear on website of another nonprofit organization, although painting were previously published by Jamestown foundation [1], which means they had copyright for publishing. The images are also hosted on Flickr [2]... My very best wishes (talk) 15:26, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that three or four of these images were initially placed on Commons by this user who posted the following quote from his email: You do have our permission. Just be sure to mention Jamestown as a source in the Wikipedia listing, and reference us with a web link to the paintings in your posting. Use this email as our special authorization. Thanks, Glen Howard, President, Jamestown Foundation, 6/14/2006. See here. Note that permission was about all images by Getman. My very best wishes (talk) 18:26, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The message from Glen Howard is more reassuring, but I'm still not sure it is specific enough to tag the image as CC-by. Kaldari (talk) 19:05, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no evidence that a foundation holds the copyright to the painting. Furthermore, the permission only applies to "you" (i.e. the uploader), and it is only possible to "use" the image, but not for example modify it. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:41, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They published them. How could they possibly not have the copyright? They responded: yes, you can use them in wikipedia... My very best wishes (talk) 21:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright to a painting belongs to the painter's heirs, not to a foundation which has published the images. Also, a Wikipedia-only is insufficient; see {{db-f3}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I have no idea if he has any heirs or who his heir are... I also have no idea what copyright agreement he had with Jamestown foundation... My very best wishes (talk) 01:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an interesting article from The Washington Times:[3]. I researched a bit and found this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Punishment_By_Mosquitoes.jpg -- Tobby72 (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Headshot of Brady Miller11478552521425535.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely non notable subject, whose article is likely to be speedily deleted under CSD A7. Safiel (talk) 04:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article has since been speedily deleted and file is now unused. Safiel (talk) 02:46, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tangalooma Crested Tern.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by January (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I no longer want this image hosted on Wikipedia 110.159.159.218 (talk) 07:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC) (sorry this was me forgot to log in)--- Cuddly Panda (talk · contribs) ^{review me! |my chatroom]} 07:11, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Altamont Corridor Express logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; a better version is uploaded to Commons under File:Altamont Corridor Express logo.png Codename Lisa (talk) 08:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sangram singh.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No Indication or proof that it is Amnjoshi's own work. This photo can be seen as an edited image of an external website Param Mudgal (talk) 12:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SaturatedHydraulicConductivity.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SoilCECdifference.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Motor cortex map.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not due to what it possibly may be; but because it is orphaned and poses no benefit being here or on Commons. I cannot speculate on what things might or might not be. The Undead Never Die (talk) 06:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Effect of soiltexture on soilwaterpotential and volumetricwatercontent.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possible textbook image, Uploader is aware of this issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Karl Tilleman competing in the 1988 Olympic Games in Seoul, Korea (2).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Textbook violation of WP:NFCC#1. Unclear why the administrator chose not to delete the file. Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Because the uploader seems to have made extensive attempts to determine if any free images exist without finding any. Therefore it's reasonable to put to wider audience if NFCC#1 is met. NtheP (talk) 19:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#1 requires evidence that the person is dead, but the uploader hasn't presented such evidence. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pan_Am_103.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pan Am 103.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Appears (to me) to be a violation of WP:F7, a non-free use instance of an image owned by AFP, a commercial news agency. The image itself is not the subject of the article. I previously listed this with a speedy delete template, with no action. One user did contest the speedy deletion, that is available on the image's talk page. Geogene (talk) 20:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is exactly one of those situations which are listed at WP:CSD#F7 and should be speedily deleted. Fails WP:NFCC#2 and WP:NFC#UUI §7. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: it now fails WP:NFCC#1 because this free image has been found. ww2censor (talk) 18:30, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.