Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 April 30

< April 29	May 1 >

April 30[edit]

File:Scott Cullather 1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Purely a matter of usefulness/uselessness; the copyright situation is not a problem. As a portrait of an insignificant person, it's really not useful except in the person's biography — q.v. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Cullather. This isn't going to be used here at Wikipedia, and it's not potentially useful for educational purposes, so it's out of scope at Commons. Find a way that it really can be used, and I'll happily withdraw. Nyttend (talk) 01:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fcic logo.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not used anymore in Federal Citizen Information Center. Leyo 20:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

move to commons Can be used again, or restored to the article (or on some other Wikipedia). -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Metropolitan Police ransomware scam.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator RJaguar3 | u | t 13:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1 as a free mock-up of a ransomware scheme could be made to serve the same encyclopedic purpose (see, for example, the lead image in Phishing. RJaguar3 | u | t 23:34, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This particular instance is actually discussed in the article and is the most prominent and recognizable example. If you think that this isn't appropriate, I can move it down to the section on the actual instance. ViperSnake151 Talk 00:51, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per VS151. This is the actual scam discussed in the section of the article. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:27, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, agree with rationale as expressed by ViperSnake151 (talk · contribs), above, at least until a free-use one becomes available for replacement, — Cirt (talk) 19:36, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.