Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 May 15

< May 14	May 16 >

May 15

File:Uvic bunnies.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yokohama houses.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yokohama.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, unverifiable source Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YOKOSUKA COMMAND SEAL.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:USNH Yokosuka Logo small white background GIF.gif Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:46, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yom haatzmaut.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YomImpersonator.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unneeded Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:54, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yonas-final.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:54, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yong tau fu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (random food stall, at one point inexplicably inserted into Anna Mons) Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:55, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YORGANCIOGLUFRANSIZBUST.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (doesn't seem to be a person we have an article about, never inserted into any article) Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yonah Mountain from West Family Restaurant.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, we have much better images[1] Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:09, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:York Satellite.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, satellite image by Japan Meteorological Agency - not public domain Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:32, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yugito Nii.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, either Unencyclopedic or copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Phil Hughes in 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, dubious own work Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yuengling Lager.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of copyrighted packaging Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:34, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YuenyangTower.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, insane color manipulation, we have better images [2] Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:34, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ysdpic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, doesn't seem to be of a notable person, copyright status unclear (a photo given as a gift by someone who's not the photographer. did giver own copyright? did giver intend to transfer copyright?) Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:37, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yshamir.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unverifiable source, seems unlikely to be genuinely freely licensed given low resolution, official look of portrait Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:38, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Drlinuslost.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:54, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The image is used to discuss one of the episode's themes and goes into more depth than 90% of the episode articles out there, including featured ones.--CyberGhostface (talk) 02:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC) Forget it, just delete it.--CyberGhostface (talk) 04:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seemingly random screenshot. Not discussed critically. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jackfriendlyfootball.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--image is not discussed critically —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Desmond's hairstyles.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 May 24#File:Desmond's hairstyles.png. — ξ ^xplicit 01:16, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. His different hairstyles can be explained adequately with prose. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:12, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: While not discussed in the image caption, the article goes into detail about the hairstyles and this image illustrates it beyond how prose could. –thedemonhog talk • edits 05:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hanso-web.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:48days.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abandoned LOST.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Because You Left.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lost-...AndFound.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lost-3x20-YoungBen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lost-Collision.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BooneDream.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lost-ConfirmedDead.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lostshapeofthingstocome.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EggtownScreen.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lost-LTDA.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lost-TheHuntingParty.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Greatest Hits.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:24, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt I don't see any connection with a greatest hits album, and it's highly generic name. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 04:54, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Greatest Hits.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lost-TwoForTheRoad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lost101.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lostjinchicken.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Meet Kevin Johnson.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Constant.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Economist.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheLieLost.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:17, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:They need you.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:17, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:What Kate Does.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:17, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ilanalost.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Whiterabbit LOST.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ji Yeon.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Looking Glass.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Claire.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enone-alkene.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not drawn according to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing, badJPG, low resolution, not used in any article. Leyo 11:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Potassium Nitrite Lewis Structure.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not drawn according to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing. Leyo 11:29, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manav Gupta's Tree of Life (fifth floor) staircase synchronization.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3a: duplicates File:Manav Gupta's 5000 sq ft Wall Mega Mural.jpg. There are probably also lots of other files in the article Tree of Life mural (Manav Gupta) which should be removed for WP:NFCC reasons. Stefan2 (talk) 12:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As it duplicates the image File:Manav Gupta's 5000 sq ft Wall Mega Mural.jpg it only adds to the explanation of the 3 dimensional view of the artwork.As for the WP:NFCC criteria, it gives the understanding of an encyclopedic content and has not been repeated but is a part of that image. It is the topmost floor view. Instead of uploading all the floor views, the user has just given the fifth floor angle for the judgement of the 2dimensional to 3d metamorphosis optical illusion beauty of the artwork mural . Max roosevelt (talk) 18:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; the fact that the mural is distributed across all the 3D surface of the building elements including the staircase etc. can easily be covered in words alone. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:18, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manav Gupta painting the Mural details to weave the story-line.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that he painted the mural is relevant. However, a photo of him painting it is irrelevant. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 12:34, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KeepI do acknowledge that fact, but the photo of him painting adds to the understanding of the reader. As for WP:NFCC#8 it does not state that there can be no copyright image of the artist and his painting together . Max roosevelt (talk) 17:56, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Seeing him painting is utterly irrelevant to understanding the work. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -in addition, needs source &, if applicable, proper release. Skier Dude (talk) 23:29, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manav Gupta detailing the Tree of Life story-line.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that some people were standing in front of the mural at one point greatly fails WP:NFCC#8 Stefan2 (talk) 12:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, same as above. Fails NFCC#8 and #3. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:58, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Performance art marathon by Manav Gupta.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The claim in the FUR that this is a "low resolution image" is blatantly wrong. 19,652 × 2,136 pixels is a very high resolution, much higher than the resolution used for most free images on Wikipedia. Also seems to fail WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 12:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep resolution is not measured by the size of the image, but by the density of the images depicted. Since this is a collage, what matters is the resolution at which the copyrighted artistic image is shown; the murals are represented with only a few pixel per centimeter, which is pretty low for a painting (see the visual artifacts caused by the low resolution in the peacock feathers and grass). Also the resolution can be reduced even further if required, no need to delete the image for that reason.

As for significance, it's illustrating the activity of the artist in a section describing the activity of the artist during the performance marathon; that's significant in my book. The other images in galleries should be deleted, but not the ones that are illustrating the text with the visual art. Diego (talk) 18:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The number of pixels of a collage should obviously not exceed the number of pixels of an image which is not a collage since this would otherwise be a way to avoid WP:NFCC#3a. Per WP:NFCCE, the burden of proof is on the one who wishes to keep the image, SOFIXIT yourself if you want to keep the image. Adding {{Non-free reduce}} is not an option as the uploader just reverts that tag. The article uses this version of the image, so that would be an adequate reduction. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Everytime you use the word "obvious" at talk pages a kitten dies. Diego (talk) 09:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If that is reduced to such a low resolution image that you suggest, no reader would be able to see the different role plays of the artist in the field of collaborative art in making that record breaking mural. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia which means giving knowledge to the readers about encyclopedic content, therefore in not making it look like a photo gallery of five images of copyright content, i had edited it into a collage. If you closely see, it is a few pixels PER IMAGE OF THE COLLAGE but as a whole i do agree it is high resolution which as i told you is for the ease of understanding for the readers Max roosevelt (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, utter failure of NFCC#8 and NFCC#3, the latter on two counts at once: it's not a single picture but six of them, and each of the six would have to be independently justified, which they are not; also, each of the six individually is still too large. It is also utterly preposterous to claim that we need all these illustrations to understand the event in question. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know where image originated; if the collage was created by the original source, it would count as a single work and wouldn't need separate rationales for each image in it. The information conveyed by the group and which is not in each separate image is the comparison of the various activities realized by the artist during the performance; if a reliable source created this composition to illustrate the marathon, having it illustrating the section Tree of Life mural (Manav Gupta)#Performance Art Marathon would be compliant with NFCC#8 and NFCC#3. Diego (talk) 09:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, the need for separate rationales doesn't depend on who made the collage. We would still need an individual explanation why we need each of the six components. BTW, the file also falls under at least two additional speedy deletion criteria right now: it lacks a source, and it has a blatantly false descriptive tag. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Need a source for every image in the mural and the appropriate release for each of them Skier Dude (talk) 23:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Painting created by Manav Gupta.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 12:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KeepI have removed the gallery look so as to get the image in accordance with WP:NFG. Please do let me know if any thing else has to be done Max roosevelt (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete either this or the next further down, unless further substantial critical commentary is added to the article about both of them. One work may be legitimate simply as an illustration of the artist's style; two can be justified only if each of them is independently necessary to support a specific piece of discussion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:07, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this one unless the article text is expanded with critically commentary of this work, keep File:Manav Gupta's acrylic on canvas.jpg. One image showing the painter's style is adequate, two without critical commentary is too much. Diego (talk) 08:56, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manav Gupta's acrylic on canvas,.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 11:15, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 12:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KeepI have removed the gallery look so as to get the image in accordance with WP:NFG. Please do let me know if any thing else has to be done Max roosevelt (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional delete, see next nomination further up. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:08, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this one, delete File:Painting created by Manav Gupta.jpg. Diego (talk) 08:56, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manav Gupta's 5000 sq ft Wall Mega Mural.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept at new lower resolution - Peripitus (Talk) 11:09, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFG in the article Manav Gupta and WP:NFCC#10c in the article Tree of Life mural (Manav Gupta). Stefan2 (talk) 12:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the reasons given for deletion have been fixed. Diego (talk) 18:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Still fails WP:NFCC#3b. The uploader reduced my previous {{non-free reduce}} tagging, so getting the image reduced that way won't work. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe if you followed Wikipedia guidelines yourself the user would colaborate instead of revert-fight? You didn't even introduced yourself to the user in his talk page, which is the minimum required (no, tag bombing the talk page doesn't count as introducing oneself). Cryptic pointers to guidelines and policies also don't work - you're expected to explain the basic meaning of the guideline to the newcomer yourself. Diego (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As for the image resolution, I'd say a 1,404px high image for a 5000 sq feet mural -about one pixel per inch- is quite low resolution. This work is not the 77 cm Mona Lisa, you know. Diego (talk) 10:07, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
keep but only in the reduced version (now provided). Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:How Artist Manav Gupta Conceptualized the Mega Mural created by him.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 13:00, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KeepI have removed the gallery look so as to get the image in accordance with WP:NFG. Please do let me know if any thing else has to be done. Max roosevelt (talk) 17:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, clear-cut case of NFCC#8 and #3 failure. We already have another picture of the work in question, and we don't need a photograph of the artist looking at it in order to understand it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:16, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree to delete this one, showing the artist with the work does not add encyclopedic value as it does not explain anything. Diego (talk) 09:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -in addition there is no source and/if applicable, (c) release. Skier Dude (talk) 23:33, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ketki Dave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged this as replaceable fair use, but the user removed the tag, claiming that "This image will have fair usage". This is indeed replaceable fair use as the person is alive. Stefan2 (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Apara Mehta.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged this as replaceable fair use, but the user removed the tag, claiming that "This image will have fair usage". This is indeed replaceable fair use as the person is alive. Stefan2 (talk) 13:12, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sarita Joshi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged this as replaceable fair use, but the user removed the tag, claiming that "This image will have fair usage". This is indeed replaceable fair use as the person is alive. Stefan2 (talk) 13:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SarirAPC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per the discussion at WT:C, files tagged with User:Buffs/PD-Iran in US are to be treated as fair use files. This one fails WP:NFCC#1, so it should be deleted. Stefan2 (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Grampa vs. Sexual Inadequacy Screenshot.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image fails Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, specifically #1 and #8. It doesn't in any way help readers understand the topic, and the scene can be adequately conveyed in words. Theleftorium ^(talk) 15:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not the object of specific commentary, not necessary to understand anything particular in the text. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:29, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bosco Hogan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged this as {{di-replaceable fair use}}, but this was disputed, stating that it is "Unreplaceable as no free alternative was found. Ulysses Film Production Ltd. was a film company in the mid-1970s established to make the film from which the image was taken, but which no longer exists. Please notify me on my talk page if you have other concerns." However, the photo shows a person who is still alive, so it is indeed replaceable per WP:NFCC#1. Stefan2 (talk) 16:58, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where does the proposer suggest an free image may be had? No free image was available online. — O'Dea (talk) 17:03, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The solution is to visit the person and take a photo of him. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:06, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is absurd. He is in a different country and might not even consent. — O'Dea (talk) 17:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's no problem. There are international trains, ferries and flights. You could travel to him or ask someone else to do that for you. See WP:NFC#UUI §1. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be such an unhelpful and facetious smartarse. You won't explain yourself when requested to do so and you make absurd and sneering remarks about international travel to get pictures to illustrate an article. How do you expect me to find out where he lives? How do you expect me to persuade him to pose? Your suggestion is snide. I ask you once again to explain why you proposed to delete the files I uploaded as I read the policies and could not see what case you intended to make from them. How can I answer a case against the pictures if the explanation is not clear? If you do not adopt a helpful attitude, I shall have to ask an administrator to intervene. You are obliged to observe WP:CIVIL. — O'Dea (talk) 22:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, living person, standard replaceability case. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Costa Rican census form 2011.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The census is relevant, but the census form is not. Fails WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 17:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No explanation has been given for the reason for this proposed deletion. On what grounds is the deletion proposed? — O'Dea (talk) 17:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The explanation is stated on the line above your question. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your meaning is not clear. I read the policy but cannot infer what you think the violation is. The onus is on you to justify your proposal clearly. — O'Dea (talk) 17:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the way it works. See WP:NFCCE: "Note that it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created—see burden of proof." Thus, it is up to you to prove that the document (as opposed to the census) is discussed critically and that the resolution is small: both sides < 400 pixels or the like, cf. Category:Rescaled fairuse files more than 7 days old#Instructions. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You say I have to provide a rationale but I was unable to provide a rationale against a motivation for deletion I did not understand, because you were so terse and cryptic. When I asked for an explanation you just used abbreviated references to policy ("See WP:NFCCE") without explaining what aspect of the policy you had in mind when proposing deletion. If you say the onus is on me to justify retention of the file, how can I do that if I am unclear what problem you have in mind? It is absurd. Now you simultaneously propose deletion while arguing for a reduction in size, so you contradict yourself. I cannot understand what you want! You are not being helpful. — O'Dea (talk) 22:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The exact aspect of the policy is stated in the first post above. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain, "The census is relevant, but the census form is not." You cannot conduct a census without forms. — O'Dea (talk) 05:10, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Irish census form 2011.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete as failing WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2, perhaps a more verbose explanation would have...well...explained better ? O'Dea - What this means is that the image has been deleted as there is no convincing argument that it significantly increases reader's understanding of the topic of the 2011 Census. The other nomination reason relates to the excessive resolution the image had, which is easily remedied - Peripitus (Talk) 11:03, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The census is relevant, but the census form is not. Fails WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 17:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No explanation has been given for the reason for this proposed deletion. On what grounds is the deletion proposed? — O'Dea (talk) 17:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The explanation is stated on the line above your question. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:09, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your meaning is not clear. I read the policy but cannot infer what you think the violation is. The onus is on you to justify your proposal clearly. — O'Dea (talk) 17:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the way it works. See WP:NFCCE: "Note that it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created—see burden of proof." Thus, it is up to you to prove that the document (as opposed to the census) is discussed critically and that the resolution is small: both sides < 400 pixels or the like, cf. Category:Rescaled fairuse files more than 7 days old#Instructions. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You say I have to provide a rationale but I was unable to provide a rationale against a motivation for deletion I did not understand, because you were so terse and cryptic. When I asked for an explanation you just used abbreviated references to policy ("See WP:NFCCE") without explaining what aspect of the policy you had in mind when proposing deletion. If you say the onus is on me to justify retention of the file, how can I do that if I am unclear what problem you have in mind? It is absurd. Now you simultaneously propose deletion while arguing for a reduction in size, so you contradict yourself. I cannot understand what you want! You are not being helpful. — O'Dea (talk) 22:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The exact aspect of the policy is stated in the first post above. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain, "The census is relevant, but the census form is not." You cannot conduct a census without forms. — O'Dea (talk) 05:11, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Egypt-airforce Air Vice Marshal.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These images fail WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 20:19, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that User:Sven Manguard removed all of the files from the article. For the purpose of this deletion request, it may be necessary to see how the files were used. For that purpose, check Special:PermanentLink/478511580. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Egypt-airforce Air Chief Marshal.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFG in the article Egyptian Air Force ranks and WP:NFCC#10c in the article Hosni Mubarak. Stefan2 (talk) 20:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Egypt-airforce Air Marshal.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This fails WP:NFG in the article Egyptian Air Force ranks and WP:NFCC#10c in the article Reda Mahmoud Hafez Mohamed. Stefan2 (talk) 20:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sfea7201.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Quality increased, old version deleted - Peripitus (Talk) 10:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image is low quality. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:03, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Scale down this version and upload it. Problem solved. — ξ ^xplicit 01:04, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hungarian Revolution Flag of 1956.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image is shadowing a Commons file and is replaced by much higher quality image: File:Flag of the Hungarian Revolution (1956).svg -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SCS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of scan of x-ray. No current use -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons but it will need a different name because commons has a different file with this name. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed tagged for rename.--Deathlaser : Chat 16:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, moved to File:Spinal cord stimulator.jpg. Move to commons. Nik thestoned 10:53, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cellar crypt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Champ00025.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:41, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cham march 2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image is of low detail and subject is not obviously noticeable. No encyclopedic value as is. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be related to File:Cham march.jpg which is in use. Could maybe be used as an alternative to that image somewhere. The photo is referenced to at Special:PermanentLink/268675924. If you can't identify the subject, a good solution is to check the uploader's past contributions. An uploader would usually upload his images to an article shortly after uploading them, and if you find an old version of an article where the image is in use, it may be possible to identify the subject. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:16, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tbone.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The robot might be copyrightable and the country of photography is unknown, so the FOP status can't be determined. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:07, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.