Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 March 1

< February 29	March 2 >

March 1

File:Hla.jpg + 1 other

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 11:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned File, Unknown Subject, no use to keep Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hoaxis.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned File, Unencyclopaedic, no use to keep Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Holladaypic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned File, Unencyclopaedic, no use to keep WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, useless image. De728631 (talk) 20:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Susan kliewer 'sinagua' statue sedona arizona.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Susan kliewer 'sinagua' statue sedona arizona.jpg; discussion should probably occur there because it is ineligible for fair use as it's currently being used. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Atlasofgeorgia.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I believe it satisfies policy as it allows the reader to view the cover of a Georgia state symbol. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 22:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Allisfulloflovevideo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive use of non-free files (WP:NFCC#3). Stefan2 (talk) 16:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Northumberland Street.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Northumberland Street pictures can be deleted as F8. The red-haired boy picture looks useless. Stefan2 (talk) 18:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lydia Patterson entrance.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision from 2010-11-30T20:34:57 should be deleted as F8 and, from what I can see from the file information page history, the revision from 2010-11-30T19:07:27 should be deleted as F9. Stefan2 (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Building1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File by User:Rtcpage has no source and no licence. File by User:Dand82 has no description and it is not clear what building it is, so it should probably be deleted as useless. Stefan2 (talk) 20:20, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer to Commons, this has a GFDL license. And the original uploader Dand82 is obviously one Dan Davis credited in the "source" parameter. I have however reverted the version to the very first one which shows a church tower. Someone had overloaded that with the image of an office building. De728631 (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- What's the use of a photo of a building if the building is unidentified? How do you determine whether freedom of panorama applies so that you know whether it can be transferred to Commons or not? --Stefan2 (talk) 10:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LexisLogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logos. Company not notable? Stefan2 (talk) 20:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muscatine Community College students.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The 2007 revision should be deleted as F1 because of File:Students at a table in Muscatine Community College courtyard.jpg. The 2011 revision has no source and no licence and was taken using a different camera model. Stefan2 (talk) 20:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FAB Super Tucano.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G12 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a case of flickrwashing. The file has been published in a Polish forum on 24 March 2009 but was uploaded to Flickr on 13 April 2009 without exif data. De728631 (talk) 20:42, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are right! This image is from Embraer: http://mediamanager.embraer.com.br/portugues/busca/detalhe_publico.asp?que_pagina=22&pagina_anterior=categorias

This image should go to Speedy delete. Dafranca (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I've tagged it for speedy deletion. De728631 (talk) 20:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pizza inn popular bluff mo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Missouri one can be deleted as F8. The uploader of the Texas one changed the description but not the licence ({{GFDL-self-with-disclaimers}}). What do you say, does it have a licence or not? Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say if a n00b uploads over an old image, then the n00b agrees to the license. ~~However, sourcing is a problem - it is really the uploader's work? Thus delete.~~ Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I was wrong; the uploader said it was by him;[1] he agrees to the license if he is technically proficient enough to change the description on the file page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michaelmeeks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo by User:Praisethelord5 should be deleted as G3, F4 or something similar. The other photos should be deleted as F8. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - ~~ditto to above.~~ Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actual reason for deletion: attack page (having a bad day so far in FFD).Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SOF day 2005.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What's "SOF day"? Unused, probably not useful. Stefan2 (talk) 23:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. That sounds and looks like Special Operation Forces Day. I agree though that the photo is useless, personal snapshot. De728631 (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.