Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 July 7

< July 6	July 8 >

July 7[edit]

File:Transition-region.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Transition-region.jpg; even if it is kept on Commons, no reason to keep it here (fair use ineligible). Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear to me why this is being nominated for deletion on copyright grounds. This is not a photograph, it is digital data produced by the TRACE spacecraft. TRACE data have all been explicitly placed in the public domain by that mission. Even the pseudocolor JPEGs are, in fact, data and are available via the TRACE data browser. It appears to me that Wikimedia Commons is being overly zealous about this. I'll mention it there. too zowie (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, with your input, I see no possibility of it being deleted on Commons. So long as it is kept there, it can be safely deleted here, since both files use the same name. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:40, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CrackpotsTheseWomen.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image does not meet NFCC 8, does not significantly add to article, and it's not ever immediately obvious what's going on. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:14, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - jc37 00:20, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:5Votes.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image does not meet NFCC 8, does not significantly add to article, and it's not ever immediately obvious what's going on. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:15, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - jc37 00:20, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mrwillisofohio.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

image fails NFCC 8, is not discussed in the article and does not add to understanding of the article Sven Manguard Wha? 00:16, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - It's a photo of Mr Willis. - jc37 00:20, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Grey's Anatomy Wishin' and Hopin' (3.14).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly does not fit the criteria, just shows two people standing. It does not help me to understand the text anymore, just decorative. — M.Mario (T/C) 11:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GAURAV SHARMA STUDENT NARNAUL.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic Ben Ben (talk) 12:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Lynch 7 13:16, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --DBig Xray 16:48, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KS_district_2-108th.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This district is outdated and has been redrawn in 2012. Here is a link to the new state districts as of 2012: http://redistricting.ks.gov/_Plans/District_Court/m5_district%20court%20-%20congressional/01-m5_districtcourt-congress-statewide.PDF

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Neiltaculodlive.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned vanity image —howcheng {chat} 17:31, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lumet-last film-Devil.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph showing a movie director talking with two actors on a movie set. While the article has quite some detailed discussion about the director's work habits, there is nothing in the discussion that's in particular need of this particular image to be understood. The image just shows people talking; what their relationship is with each other or what the director's particular techniques are in dealing with the actors cannot be seen in it. From just looking at the picture, these guys might love each other or hate each other's guts; the image simply doesn't tell. Thus fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:16, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thad and Adrianne mid-show promo 2006.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Second of two non-free images in the same article of the same couple. Does not meet minimal use requirement or NFCC 8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:49, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.