Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 January 31

< January 30	February 1 >

January 31

File:Graph-potus-heights.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, can't see use :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM} 01:20, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GraphDAFC5.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned to (more up-to-date) File:GraphDAFC2009.jpg :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM} 01:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:5.ArnoldCircusKlezmer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely © someone else. Stefan2 (talk) 01:38, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader removed the deletion tag, but I still don't think that the image is free, so I readded it. The page states: "For any reuse or distribution of this image, please attribute with at least the photographer's name Åbäke along with the license information". Åbäke is not a personal name but a noun which you can find in a dictionary[1]. Due to its negative meaning, no one would ever dream about using it as a name for their children. Besides, this is the kind of image which would typically need OTRS permission. I meant to put this request at the PUF page, but I must have forgot to select the PUF checkbox in Twinkle --Stefan2 (talk) 11:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's a poster - delete (I would usually tag these as F11 no-permission) Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Great Cumbrae.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned to standard locator map :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM} 01:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - redundant to more recent map. Warofdreams talk 09:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Greco Trinity.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned to higher quality File:Trinidad El Greco2.jpg :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM} 03:58, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - What is bizarre is that the source listed for this image is actually the source of the other image. This image is noticeably lighter and more textured than the listed source. It is also slightly smaller and very slightly blurry, so no point in keeping it. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 11:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:32nd Armored Regiment (Distinguished Unit Crest).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned to higher quality File:32nd Armored Regiment (Distinguished Unit Crest).svg :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM} 04:15, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pt logo.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 09:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pt logo.PNG. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:00, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I wanted to nominated it as well. PD-Mexico. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:17, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SJRStatelogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused PD file replaced by svg on commons Bulwersator (talk) 09:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Trevor Crowe.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to commons as jpg Bulwersator (talk) 09:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tranvia-en-Plaza-de-Armas-3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, lower quality than https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tramway_in_front_of_City_Hall_in_Plaza_de_Armas,_Old_San_Juan.jpg Bulwersator (talk) 09:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Betelgeuse Resolved IOTA.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free astronomical photograph of a star, used in an article about the role of that star "in fiction". However, the section it's being used in is purely about scientific, real-world aspects of the star, and bears no relation to any discussion related to the actual topic of the article (or if there is such a connection, it's an implied and unsourced one and entirely WP:OR). Fails NFCC#8 with respect to the actual purpose of the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:55, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Betelgeuse in fiction is one of a collection of articles (Aldebaran in fiction, Alpha Centauri in fiction, etc) that have been moved out of the general article Stars and planetary systems in fiction because of the large number of fictional citations they contain. Each of these articles contains an Overview section giving physical, exoplanetary, astronomical, etymological, and cultural background on the star. This is important information for readers of the article so that they can better understand and appreciate the choices made by authors of works of fiction in portraying the star as a location in space or as the host of a planetary system. In particular, the image of Betelgeuse showing star spots as evidence of convective cells that contribute to the star's envelope and variability are relevant to some of the works of fiction that feature Betelgeuse.

OperaJoeGreen (talk) 20:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First thing, this is a rather poor structural choice for a series of articles. These non-fictional kinds of info belong in the main article on the star itself, of which the "in fiction" ought to be treated as a sub-article. Second, if the star spots are "relevant" to some of the works, as you claim, I'm not seeing any of that in the article. Where is that connection described and discussed? Third, however, even if such a discussion was present, without reliable sourcing, everything that would relate the discussion of the fictional stuff with the physical info is "original research". Fut.Perf. ☼ 00:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unfree astronomy images can usually be replaced by free {{PD-USGov-NASA}} images, for example File:Betelgeuse – NASA.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed image. OperaJoeGreen (talk) 05:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:5000×5000 noise.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, can't see use :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM} 14:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ASMoorlandFlight.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, without description Bulwersator (talk) 15:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

this has a somewhat complex history. It was upload about 5 or 6 years ago, along with several others, for Ásmundar Sveinsson. Then someone said that they were copyright protected, (though they are my pictures) so I took them out of the article, but did not remove them from wikipedia. I did not know how to do that. Now looking at our Freedom of panorama article I see that Iceland has freedom of panorama for non-commercial purposes, such as wikipedia (?) but probably not good for commons. Likely it should just go. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 16:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It could be useful to have at least one example of a sculpture by him in the article. I see that he was born before 1923 and that he has lived in Sweden. Were any of his statues erected before 1 January 1923? Are any of his statues in Sweden? An old revision of the article shows that there are plenty of pictures on Wikipedia, all of them being post-1923 statues in Iceland. I think that we should keep one of them (not sure which one) as fair use and delete the rest per commons:COM:FOP#Iceland. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ateneo colors.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PD, unused, a vector version of this image is also available Bulwersator (talk) 15:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FEU colors.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PD, unused, a vector version of this image is also available Bulwersator (talk) 15:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NU colors.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PD, unused, a vector version of this image is also available Bulwersator (talk) 15:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PCU colors.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PD, unused, a vector version of this image is also available Bulwersator (talk) 15:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stvgroupplc.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Little foreseeable use. Author and date information missing. Cloudbound (talk) 18:27, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.