Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 February 8

< February 7	February 9 >

February 8

File:Super Bowl XLVI diagram by Chartball.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation. The indicated source of this image is http://www.chartball.com/ . This web site does not seem to explicitly state that these images can be released under any Creative Commons or free content licence. The only indication is the words "All Rights Reserved" at the bottom of every page of this site. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am the copyright holder of these football diagrams, and I did grant the public license upon uploading the images to Wikipedia. What else do I have to do to grant usage? Chartball —Preceding undated comment added 14:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials Bulwersator (talk) 14:23, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Super-Bowl-XLV-diagram-by-Chartball.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation. The indicated source of this image is http://www.chartball.com/ . This web site does not seem to explicitly state that these images can be released under any Creative Commons or free content licence. The only indication is the words "All Rights Reserved" at the bottom of every page of this site. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Super-Bowl-XLIV-diagram-by-Chartball.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation. The indicated source of this image is http://www.chartball.com/ . This web site does not seem to explicitly state that these images can be released under any Creative Commons or free content licence. The only indication is the words "All Rights Reserved" at the bottom of every page of this site. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Super-Bowl-XLIII-diagram-by-Chartball.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation. The indicated source of this image is http://www.chartball.com/ . This web site does not seem to explicitly state that these images can be released under any Creative Commons or free content licence. The only indication is the words "All Rights Reserved" at the bottom of every page of this site. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Super-Bowl-XLII-diagram-by-Chartball.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; tagged with {{di-no permission}}. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation. The indicated source of this image is http://www.chartball.com/ . This web site does not seem to explicitly state that these images can be released under any Creative Commons or free content licence. The only indication is the words "All Rights Reserved" at the bottom of every page of this site. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader appears to be saying the website is his own. {{Di-no permission}} situation. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Salman Khan and Aamir Khan on Dus Ka Dum.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot from a TV show, used to support an account of a particular incident on the show. Fails NFCC#8, because the nature of the incident can be (and is) easily conveyed in words and is not in need of illustration to be understood. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Salman Khan on Dus Ka Dum.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free headshot of a TV presenter in a show. Fails NFCC#8+1: replaceable with a free image as far as showing what the person looks like is concerned, and fails to contribute significantly towards understanding the show. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Filipe 'Onevela.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely that it is an work by the uploader as claimed. The date is definitively incorrect. The image might be kept after correcting license, date, etc. Leyo 08:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Semisi Nau with his wife Matelita Fatumu Tuliakiono.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely that it is an work by the uploader as claimed. The date is definitively incorrect. The image might be kept after correcting license, date, etc. Leyo 08:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pita Nau and Lesieli Galloway on their way taken at Tupou College reunion in 1968.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely that it is an work by the uploader as claimed. The date is definitively incorrect. Leyo 08:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Madonna-dont-tell-me-video-cap-0061.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC criterion 3b: the resolution is too high. User:112.198.83.168 keeps reverting my attempts to add {{fair use reduce}} so it appears not to be possible to make this image comply with criterion 3b. The article might also have too many non-free images already. Stefan2 (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Letrero Nuevo Cuartel Policia Municipal, Barrio Canas Urbano, Ponce, PR.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free poster of a building under construction. Dubious FUR: article is not about the building, but about the organisation that it will house. Architectural detail of the planned building is not the topic of encyclopedic discussion; its overall nature, to the extent that it is actually relevant to the article, can easily be covered by text alone (sourced description of its size, costs etc.). Not in need of visual illustration, hence fails NFCC#1+8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not needed for the article. See also Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 6#File:Letrero Nuevo Cuartel Policia Municipal, Barrio Canas Urbano, Ponce, PR.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TTIS logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Higher quality file is available in the PNG format at File:TTIS logo.png. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 16:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Also tagged as 'Do not move to Commons'. Cloudbound (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sothebys logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Also tagged here as 'Do not move to Commons'. Cloudbound (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SomertonMan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since it entered the public domain in Australia after the URAA date. I have clarified the file information page on Commons so that it mentions the URAA situation. I assume that this will be deleted from Commons once the URAA discussion has ended. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sonae2010.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UKTV.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Less complex than edge logo, so "This image is believed to be non-free or possibly non-free in its home country, the United Kingdom." is dubious Bulwersator (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The Edge logo is not necessary the least complex copyrighted logo that you can find in the UK. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umbro.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that "This image is believed to be non-free or possibly non-free in its home country, the United Kingdom." is dubious and this image can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 22:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Junaid Iqbal1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic image, apparently of the editor himself; not used in any articles. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Junaid Iqbal2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic image, apparently of the editor himself; not used in any articles. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:10-Hryvnia-1994-front.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This should either be deleted as unnecessary and orphaned (because of File:10-Hryvnia-1994-front.png) or kept as fair use. Per {{PD-UA-exempt}}, it is not copyrighted in the source country, but since it was first published after 1989 (when the United States removed the copyright notice requirement), it might nevertheless be copyrighted in the United States. Special government provisions for copyrights do not necessarily apply internationally[1] and the United States does not apply the rule of the shorter term, so in my opinion the US copyright status on this work is unknown. Stefan2 (talk) 23:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:White Brazilians.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this file can be deleted. It says that it is not the same as the image on Commons, but that is only because of an edit war on Commons where people have been reverting between a high-resolution cut image and this low-resolution uncut image. Stefan2 (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.