Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 February 26

< February 25	February 27 >

February 26

File:GravanoFBI.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently actually created by the state of Arizona. Subject is being held in a Federal facility, but no evidence this was the FBI work it's proclaimed to be. Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 02:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Should I bother alerting the uploader if he/she's permanently blocked? --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 02:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd say yes. Even if the uploader won't be able to discuss the matter, other people, for example those involved in the blocking process, might be watching his user page and notice your notice. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Los Angeles Police Department Chief Of Police.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, obsolete, no foreseeable use. FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Portal.libertarianism.en.2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an old version of the newer commons file http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portal.libertarianism.en.png so this is just an unused orphan that is using up space. Abel (talk) 07:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dadra and Nagar haveli Map.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free map. Isn't a map always replaceable by drawing your own map of the same area? Stefan2 (talk) 09:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to inform you that the map in itself is non-free but the site allows to download the original map. When I downloaded the map it had a water-mark saying - www.mapsofindia.com which means that the original map is modified to include the source site. So I can use it anywhere I want as the source is already embedded in the picture. there is no mention in the website about its usage policies etc. So, please tell me if it is still marked for deletion? To your advice for creating the map - it is not easy to create a map in such a small time I have. I am here to expand wikipedia in my limited time but I make sure that all the contributions I make are reliable and would not lead to any discrepancies. Please consider my limitations. -AJ —Preceding undated comment added 17:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

I'm afraid Stefan2 is correct here. According to our policies on non-free content, we insist that images must be under a completely free license, or that they must be replaced with self-made items. What counts is that making such a replacement is possible in principle, not whether it's difficult or a lot of work. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:59, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Agona-Akrofonso Historic Center.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Claims all of "fair use", "own work" and "free licence" at the same time. Looks replaceable. Stefan2 (talk) 09:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yogoothies Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Yogoothies proposed for deletion per G11. If deleted, this logo should probably also be deleted. Stefan2 (talk) 09:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dead Man Walking (Body of Proof).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; the solitary keep !vote from uploader does not address the concerns raised by the nominator, which was that the file fails to meet WP:NFCC#8. Note that the burden is upon you, the uploader to prove that the omission of such an image in the context of the article would be highly detrimental to a reader's understanding. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox. Merely shows two protagonists in an otherwise random, nondescript scene. Not the object of analytical commentary, not required for understanding anything in particular in the article. Generic boilerplate rationale lacking specific claims of contextual significance. Purely decorative infobox use; fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is required as part of what critics said in the Recpetion area. They described their relationship, so the reader understands the relationship between them, if they were close, etc. It should not be deleted, as this was the main plot throughout the episdoe, aswell as being part of critical commentary. Mayhem Mario 17:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unit code redblue77.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 20:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unit code redblue76.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 20:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unit code redblue74.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 20:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unit code redblue73.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 20:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unit code redblue40.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 20:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unit code red91.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, without description therefore useless (see more on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Polskifone ) Bulwersator (talk) 20:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unit code no colour3518.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 21:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unit code red80.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 21:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unit code no colour41.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused (except sandbox filled with random pictures), without description therefore useless Bulwersator (talk) 21:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paulwaggoner.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. Extremely blurry. Stefan2 (talk) 22:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.