Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 December 14

< December 13	December 15 >

December 14[edit]

File:Thomastroubridge.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lower quality version of Commons file File:Sir Thomas Troubridge, 1st Baronet.jpg Rd232 ^talk 01:44, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as F8. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Rhinoceros painting.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lower quality version of Commons file File:Pietro Longhi - The Rhinoceros - WGA13408.jpg. Rd232 ^talk 01:47, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons this JPG has better contrast to make out details. -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 06:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as F8. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:40, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The image on the Commons is the better of the two; this one should be deleted. -- Dianna (talk) 20:43, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:G-Dragon performing at Mnet MAMA 2012 in Hong Kong.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted photo of a living person. Even with permission fromauthor, copyirghted photos of living people are not acceptable under free use policy. 小龙 (Timish) # ^{xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng} 14:18, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:08, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lucinda Moyers.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: DELETE. postdlf (talk) 05:51, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image appears to violate WP:NFCC#8 for its use in Alex Trebek. It is being used to illustrate a fairly minor incident, and her image for identification does not help to understand Trebek's robbery and subsequent injury. Further, from the latest news I've discovered she pled not guilty. I haven't seen any results from an actual trial, so using the mugshot for a non-notable person without evidence of guilt for the illustrated incident also raises WP:BLP concerns. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:56, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The inclusion of this image seems to give undue weight to the incident and, as mentioned, raises BLP concerns. Gobōnobō ⁺ ^c 21:52, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Knockcroghery.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. I found one of the images in this collage here, where it is not cropped. Throws uploader's claims entirely out the window. — ξ ^xplicit 01:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On this image's talk page the uploader claims the images were made by him and his friends, now he removed the "no source" tag with a claim they are all his own work. He also uploaded a blatant copyright violation stolen from here as File:Roscommon Hospital.jpg, now deleted, as well as another copyright violation to the commons as commons:File:Sacred Heart Home, Roscommon.jpg. Based on these examples I don't trust this uploader or any his images. ww2censor (talk) 20:55, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it would be best to delete all of the images I have uploaded. A photo taken by me has been deleted already based on the (mistaken) belief that it was "stolen" from another website. In fact, that was a photo I created and allowed my local hospital to use in its literature. This photo was apparently subsequently used by the HSE's website and therefore appeared, at first glance, to be the property of the HSE.

Neither I nor my friends wish for our personal details to be displayed on Wikipedia. If we cannot display our work without including our personal details, then we consent to having it removed. I can appreciate the need to have verifiable images on Wikipedia and understand your reasons for not wishing to use our work.JD2 (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep AGF. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roscommon Views.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete per blatant lying above. — ξ ^xplicit 01:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Based on this uploader's other copyright violations I don't trust that this montage is all his own work. See nomination for File:Knockcroghery.jpg above on this page. ww2censor (talk) 21:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep AGF. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:42, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.