Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 August 13

< August 12	August 14 >

August 13

File:David Cassidy I Write the Songs.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous to File:I Write the Songs cover.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 00:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guasav10.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, license adjusted. — ξ ^xplicit 00:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

logo for Algodoneros de Guasave; doubtful uploader is (c) holder; no souorce Skier Dude (talk) 01:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Stuff like this should be retagged as fair use rather than deleted. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Artists rendering of new buildng..jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since this school is scheduled to open in September 2012 (and presumably construction is complete by now), the image is replaceable. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC) As at Aug. 18 the landscaping is more or less finished and so it will be possible to produce an original photo in the next week or two. --Mdruiven (talk) 01:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:K-RITH building.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Building was completed in mid-2012. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:William W. Ray House 1916.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable by a free photograph of this house or a similar house designed by Taylor Woolley. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lasalle & Koch Toledo 1930s rendering.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at the Google Street View for 513 Adams St., Toledo, OH and do not see any difference between the building then and now. Therefore, a modern photograph should suffice. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Billa308.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The image has no contextual significance in the article. The rationale used is to show the look of the lead character. The two non-free poster images on the article also do that very well. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:55, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:12" Promo "I Specialize in Love" Expose.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous to File:12" Single "I Specialize In Love" Sharon Brown.jpeg .jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 10:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stefan2, I am not clear on why this file is slated for deletion. I originally uploaded an image that was too large, but this has been fixed, please see: "This non-free file has been replaced with a smaller or lower quality version in order to comply with Wikipedia policy." on the file page. I don't understand why the reason for deletion is "superfluous." The article has been enhanced, with the relevant images added to the text. Thank you. Mayanalda (talk) 08:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFCC#3a. You don't use multiple unfree images if one image is enough to understand the topic. In this case, the extra image doesn't help me understanding the topic any better. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yue Guoqiang2007.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned: File:Yue Guoqiang2007.svg Stefan2 (talk) 11:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abdulnasser Gharem with King Abdullah Bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded: File:Abdulnasser Gharem with King Abdullah Bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud.jpg Stefan2 (talk) 11:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stefan2, I'm not sure I understand why you want to delete the image of artist Abdulnasser Gharem with King Abdullah? I'm fairly new here as a contributor, but happy to hear your thoughts anytime. Best, Arabia23 —Preceding undated comment added 09:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need for the PDF file since there also is a JPG file. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:06, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Morven.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The current revision seems to be an orphaned user photo (see Special:PermanentLink/3657439). No foreseeable use. An old revision can be deleted as F8. Stefan2 (talk) 12:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Windows Store.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

I think this image should be deleted because it disregards various requirements of WP:NFCC, including #1 (No free equivalent), #3 (Minimal usage), #8 (Contextual significance) and #10 (image policy). In other words, it displays the copyright-protected assets of companies other than Microsoft (including Pixar and Walt Disney), it does not provide a good fair-use rationale for doing so and it is never discusses inside the article itself in a manner that text alone is insufficient; in fact it is never discussed at all and is purely decorative.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 12:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC) Codename Lisa (talk) 12:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Windows 8 Login Screen.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

I think this copyright-protected image should be deleted because it does not fulfill items #6 and #8 of WP:NFCC, i.e. contextual significance and having a fair-use rationale. It is simply thrown about in Windows 8 article to decorate it. ("To disfigure it" would be a more accurate description) and its image description page does not contain anything that can be called a proper fair use rationale.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC) Codename Lisa (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Task Manager.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

I think this image should be deleted because it does not adhere to WP:NFCC, items #6 (image specific policy) and #8 (contextual significance). To be more specific, this image is purely decorative and is not discussed in the article at all. Moreover, its fair-use rationale is what can be technically described as incoherent gibberish.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC) Codename Lisa (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deep Red by Palestinian Artist Bissan Rafe, Oil on Canvas.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFG. Presumably also fails WP:NFCC#1 as I assume that there are other examples of Palestinian art which are in the public domain and thus can be used instead. Stefan2 (talk) 16:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:כולל פולין וורשא.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like an unused logo. Presumably {{PD-textlogo}}, but no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 19:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TwinCam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two copies of the same file. The licences require attributing the authors, but different authors are listed. The correct author is unclear. Unused without foreseeable use. Should be SVG anyway. Stefan2 (talk) 19:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This was a few years ago, but I think the original file TwinCam.jpg went missing. I happened to have a copy of the page that used it, so reloaded the image. It looks like it was renamed to Twin.jpg. The one by Syrtha is the original, but perhaps needs renaming so it shows up in the article on compound bows. Mr Barndoor 15:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Barndoor (talk • contribs)

Looks like neither version of the image is used any more anyway, so deletion is OK with me. Mr Barndoor (talk) 13:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Trainer Tim Cooney with a 500lb siberian tiger.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Tim cooney with 500 pound siberian tiger.tif on commons Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:14, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.