Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 September 27
September 27
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:UP 7015 plan view.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lordkinbote (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free image fails WP:NFCC#1. It is reasonable to believe that one can either (A) create a new diagram of the layout of a dome car from scratch that would be free, or (B) photograph one of many dome cars still in existence. In any case, this image is replaceable. SchuminWeb (Talk) 12:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It is quite ironic that SchuminWeb nominated this image for deletion almost exactly 1 year after he previously closed my deletion request as keep: Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 18#File:UP 7015 plan view.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- So I did, look at that. Such is what happens when one is a year older and wiser, I suppose. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:34, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Until I see evidence that a free or fair-use version is available, I'm going to have to oppose this one. Having said that, is there any evidence that we have editors that can duplicate the diagram from scratch that would be free? ----DanTD (talk) 14:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "Available" is not the threshold for replaceability. "Possible" is the threshold for replaceability. It is very possible for someone to actually create a diagram of a dome car from scratch, as dome cars do still exist in this modern age. I was on board one on National Train Day this year. [1] Thus one can certainly create their own source material for an original, free diagram (tip: take lots of photos). SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Until I see evidence that a free or fair-use version is available, I'm going to have to oppose this one. Having said that, is there any evidence that we have editors that can duplicate the diagram from scratch that would be free? ----DanTD (talk) 14:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- So I did, look at that. Such is what happens when one is a year older and wiser, I suppose. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:34, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Qxz-ad157.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wronkiew (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
One of the pictures in the add Commons:File:First Light.jpg was deleted as unfree. MGA73 (talk) 19:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The image mentioned was deleted because it was a lower quality version of File:S90 47890.jpg, which is a NASA image - perfectly acceptable. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:22, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Circumcised human penis.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LightBulbFilm (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused personal photo. Sreejith K (talk) 19:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. When will people grow up and realize that we don't want to see their insignificant little penis on the Internet? SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:19, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.