Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 30

< July 29	July 31 >

July 30[edit]

File:Shuvo.sk.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan picture Mblumber (talk) 02:31, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Buryat native and Buddhist temple.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a work of the US government. Photographer was Vladimir Filonov for the Moscow Times. Per the Library of Congress group record, "Rights status of individual images not evaluated." howcheng {chat} 04:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Itunes10win32.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In violation of WP:NFCC#3: Another image, File:iTunes screenshot.png supplants it. Fleet Command (talk) 07:31, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:America is dunking.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:Dunkin' Donuts logo.svg, which is used in the same article. Kelly ^hi! 13:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mindbender.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user image. Kelly ^hi! 14:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Part of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Mind Benders, should've been deleted 4 years ago. As one of the organisers of Mind Benders, I uploaded this self-compiled logo. Der yck C. 15:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Self blast.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 14:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it has been modified to File:Disjoncteur-selfblast.svg, the svg file is used now. Dingy (talk) 03:22, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC03930.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Claimed to be self-made, but there is a watermark in the lower right-hand corner of the image that says "wowTURKEY.com". —Bkell (talk) 16:04, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thalhimers Walnut Mall.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No license stated. Labelscar blog is all rights reserved, so I doubt this can be fair use — but would it qualify as "non-free historic image" since the chain is defunct? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 16:32, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see this image communicating a lot of information. The logo could be extracted (if not available from any other source) and as an independent element would be public domain. Otherwise, it looks like any other mall store entrance, with nothing unique being conveyed that I can see that might justify its use as "historic". postdlf (talk) 00:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- In other words, delete, fails WP:NFCC#8. postdlf (talk) 19:13, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It will be difficult to clear the photo as anything but non-free, even if the original source has vanished from the net, clearly the photograph is sufficiently recently to fall under default copyright law. As Postdlf stated, the store's logo could be extracted/recreated as uncopyrightable text, and used instead - in other words, NFCC#1 is not met. --MASEM (t) 00:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Keep a rollin.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused album cover for a band (House of Cain) whose article was speedily deleted in 2009 for not meeting the notability guidelines at WP:BAND. —Bkell (talk) 16:40, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:House of cain band photoshoot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photograph of a band (House of Cain) whose article was speedily deleted in 2009 for not meeting the notability guidelines at WP:BAND. —Bkell (talk) 16:40, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David Paulison.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unable to verify copyright status. Kelly ^hi! 17:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a better image is used on teh article and is available here. --Kumioko (talk) 16:43, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Millad-Juloos-Bradford-2011-Kamran-Bashir.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stated variously as own work by uploader, copyright released by http://www.nisbat-e-rasooli.co.uk/, and (originally) as under the Open Government License (a free license used by governments in the U.K.). Also, subject does not appear to be notable, and the article about him was just nominated for speedy deletion for no evidence of any notability, so could be out of scope. —innotata 20:55, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cornershot-ani.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Animated gif of the gun in question used under a claim of fair use. The article already has a free image of the gun that demonstrates the bent head and on which the digital camera display could be pointed out. And even if we didn't already have a free image, certainly one could be created. --B (talk) 22:37, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I found the animation extremely useful and informative in practically showing exactly how the system works. In this respect, is far better than the still shot (sorry, image), which does not usefully show the viewscreen. If a picture is worth a thousand words, a moving picture . . . (add your own multiplier) Darkman101 (talk) 09:25, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spartan100.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of a gun from the manufacturer's website. According to the article, it is still used today. It therefore is considered replaceable. B (talk) 23:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:StoegerCoachPromo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of a gun that is still in production/use. It is obviously replaceable. B (talk) 23:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RugerGoldLabelShotgun.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of a gun that is still in production/use. It is considered replaceable. B (talk) 23:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BerettaSilverPigeonS.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image of a gun being used under a claim of fair use. The gun is still in existence today - the image is therefore considered replaceable. B (talk) 23:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bernarddzoma.pdf[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. This discussion and the file description page give me no reason to believe that Dzoma is the copyright holder, and thus it is not his place to assign a free license to the photo. One can have a copy of the photo in one's collection, but one can still not be the copyright holder for the photo. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

doubtful license Postoronniy-13 (talk) 23:44, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I received this photo Bernard Dzoma from his daughter, with Bernard's permission to publish it with his article. I object to the removal of the image. This photo is owned by Bernard Dzoma and he gives his permission for it to be on his article Endo999 (talk) 04:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was the photo created by Mr. Dzoma (or any person being agree to publish photo in Wikipedia)? --Postoronniy-13 (talk) 06:56, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is a private photo owned by Bernard Dzoma, and he has agreed to have it published in Wikipedia. I don't believe it has been published anywhere previously. Copyright is owned by Bernard Dzoma. Endo999 (talk) 17:08, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EOD.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

generic name, no source, subjects/event not identified, orphaned Skier Dude (talk) 23:58, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.