Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 August 17

< August 16	August 18 >

August 17[edit]

File:Iran national football team 2010.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC) also: File:M.R. Khalatbari.jpg, File:A. Ghotbi.jpg (cropped versions of same file)[reply]

Photograph claimed to be PD in the US due to publication in Iran and lack of copyright relations between Iran and the US. However, the only source given, afshinghotbi.com, is in fact a US website registered in Drums, Pennsylvania, which asserts copyright. Independently of this, we have had a long-standing practice (instituted years ago par ordre de Jimbo) of not relying on this kind of PD argument but of respecting copyrights from Iran and similar countries. Fut.Perf. ☼ 00:51, 17 August 2011 (UTC) à[reply]

Delete: Valid reasons per nomination. Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ice cream cone.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It does not appear http://www.girlpower.gov even exists. Sourcelink is dead, license is improbable, and this is easy to replace. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:27, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Inappropriate license; Image permission states, "Presumed public domain."?, and further the image licensing shows, "work of the United States Federal Government", with no source (dead link) for verification, no author information, and obviously not acceptable for upload to Wikimedia Commons. Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1898-front-school-2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, unidentified. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1894-side-school.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, unidentified. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1898-side-school-2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, unidentified. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2-1 note breve (music).svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, there are other, more commonly used versions of this file. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:43, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination.Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Polyethylene glycol chemical structure 2.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These two versions of the file were recovered by a case of {{split media}}... they are obsolete to File:Polyethylene glycol chemical structure.png. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:47, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The chemical structure is wrong anyway - the polymer should terminate in -OH, not an ethyl group. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:50, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nomination and comments by Edgar181. Otr500 (talk) 17:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2006 Hot Wheels car First Edition Ferrari 512 M.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of a copyrighted object, orphaned. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:55, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. If this is a copyrighted image it certainly should be deleted. Otr500 (talk) 17:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Icespecialagent.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source is a deadlink, no identification or explanation of what is going on, orphaned. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. Source is a dead link; verified 21 August 2011. Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chance of a Lifetime Giant Computer.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed for understanding of topic. Low-res image is also blurry and low-quality screengrab. Sottolacqua (talk) 12:07, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Womaneatingchocolate.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, non-encyclopedic: This picture is not educational in any respect of the word but erotic and should not be on Wikipedia. The fact that the picture depicts an act more than necessary to convey "any" educational value and the added comments, "this one was done in my basement" as self advertising, is proof that the picture should be deleted as soon as possible. Otr500 (talk) 12:35, 17 August 2011 (UTC) Otr500 (talk) 12:35, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nikkoensis leaf.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending for three weeks, no evidence of permission. –Drilnoth (T/C) 16:13, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. Still no response from contributing editor. Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pioneer Leaf.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending for three weeks, no evidence of permission. –Drilnoth (T/C) 16:14, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. Still no response from contributing editor. Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Patriot leaf.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending for three weeks, no evidence of permission. –Drilnoth (T/C) 16:14, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. Still no response from contributing editor. Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EmpresariaAR08 Prf6(FINAL).pdf[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This pdf document is a company's annual report uploaded by an editor with a username that matches the company name. Annual reports are essentially promotional material. This document serves no useful purpose for Wikipedia. There may be copyright problems too - does the uploader really have the company's permission to release this document into the public domain? Peacock (talk) 18:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. COPYVIO is serious. Otr500 (talk) 17:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit body dinamo09drugi.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, does not appear to be the kit in use for either 2008-09 or 2009-10, the way kits are, this isn't likely to be reused. Uploader said "You can feel free to do anything you desire with these two images" and "I don't see any valid reason to keep them." (The other image is in use, so will be kept). Sven Manguard Wha? 19:23, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nomination. I don't see any reason to keep it either. Otr500 (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.