Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 March 20
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
March 20
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Acrostic-names-code-Adam-Terah.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Deancoombs (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused original research presented as a table in JPEG format. —Bkell (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unusable. If it were to be used in an article, a table with the same information would serve the purpose much better. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: orphaned and never likely to be of any use at all. -- BigDom 18:06, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Acrostic-bible-code-adam abraham.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Deancoombs (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused original research. —Bkell (talk) 00:04, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unusable. If it were to be used in an article, a table with the same information would serve the purpose much better. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: orphaned and never going to be of any use. -- BigDom 18:07, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Milvina's Flag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ncpanthers24 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- There appears to be no such place. Mikemoral♪♫ 03:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; it appears to be something made up one day; image has no value. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Rationale for deletion was not sufficient nor based on any policy or guideline. Additionally, I've uploaded an image of higher resolution, thanks you our friends over at Amazon.com. Not too difficult of a task. — ξxplicit 01:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Flobots - Survival Story.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by AlexBriggs13 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Too LQ to be of any use; pixellated up the arse. Sceptre (talk) 04:48, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I can't find a higher quality alternative and it is currently in use. -- BigDom 18:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Atlhockeylogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pharos04 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- OB: File:Map of Atlantic Hockey states.svg supersedes this image. Powers T 15:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shadow Tower Abyss - Dismemberment.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mephistophelian (notify | contribs | uploads).
- From: Shadow Tower Abyss - Redundant non-free image following third party assessment: Too many images - WP:NFCC Mephistophelian † 18:13, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: orphaned; fails WP:NFCC#7. -- BigDom 18:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shadow Tower Abyss - Inventory and stats.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mephistophelian (notify | contribs | uploads).
- From: Shadow Tower Abyss - Redundant non-free image following third party assessment: Too many images - WP:NFCC Mephistophelian † 18:13, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: orphaned; fails WP:NFCC#7. -- BigDom 18:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shadow Tower Abyss - Rifling.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mephistophelian (notify | contribs | uploads).
- From: Shadow Tower Abyss - Redundant non-free image following third party assessment: Too many images - WP:NFCC Mephistophelian † 18:13, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: orphaned; fails WP:NFCC#7. -- BigDom 18:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and tag as {{pd-textlogo}}. PhilKnight (talk) 11:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bvtsurfacefleet logo.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mark83 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Can be removed from BAE Systems Surface Ships without affecting the article. Cloudbound (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- BAE Systems Surface Ships is the renamed BVT Surface Fleet. The logo, while therefore no longer used by the company, is an important piece of its history. Use of the logo in the article complies with Wikipedia non-free content policy, logo guidelines, and fair use under United States copyright law. Mark83 (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like {{pd-textlogo}} to me, which means it doesn't need to comply with our non-free content criteria. Powers T 12:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- BAE Systems Surface Ships is the renamed BVT Surface Fleet. The logo, while therefore no longer used by the company, is an important piece of its history. Use of the logo in the article complies with Wikipedia non-free content policy, logo guidelines, and fair use under United States copyright law. Mark83 (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I think the logo adds some understanding to the article, but I definitely agree with LtPowers' suggestion that the logo isn't original enough to be copyrighted. -- BigDom 18:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Although I agree that this file should be tagged with {{pd-textlogo}}, I'm not finding it in the source. I did happen to find this similar logo, though. — ξxplicit 19:58, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mowbli Jumping small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ash (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Can be removed from The Carphone Warehouse without affecting the article. Cloudbound (talk) 22:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No, this is a key logo for the company. It is used widely in their advertizing. The "character" is even on the roof of the headquarters building, about 10 foot or more high and can be seen while driving along the A40. Ash (talk) 22:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Agree with the nominator that the logo fails WP:NFCC#8 as it doesn't significantly increase understanding of the topic. -- BigDom 18:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. NW (Talk) 21:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WBR greyyellow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dunks58 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 22:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; shows progression of WB label styles in a way words cannot. Powers T 12:29, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep to show how the Warner Bros. label designs evolved over the years. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. NW (Talk) 21:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Grateful-Dead WB-7016.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dunks58 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 22:42, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; shows progression of WB label styles in a way words cannot. Powers T 12:29, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As the the Warner Bros. Records label design has evolved over the years and the photos are necessary to show the evolution. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:40, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.