Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 December 27

< December 26	December 28 >

December 27[edit]

File:Launch station of Libra radio.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio. Image and image contents are copyright of Google, regardless of who performed a print screen into Microsoft Paint. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 00:17, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Startrekgenpost.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn (non-admin closure). JJ98 (Talk) 06:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only one source, this image has no author information. JJ98 (Talk) 03:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:FILM and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline guidelines. More than one source and "author" are not required. Have replaced image. -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 05:53, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Linearfe.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, replaceable by text. Kelly ^hi! 04:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SilkTork.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 04:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Omernos.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user sig. Kelly ^hi! 04:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
comment it could be used as an example of a signature or cursive script.... and license is compatible with commons. 184.144.160.77 (talk) 05:43, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RDawkins saint.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, UE. Kelly ^hi! 04:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Star trek nemesis ver2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Despite the uploader's original withdrawal, this was still deleted because of a !vote after the original non-admin closure in regards to an insufficient fair use rationale. If interested users would like to re-upload with a fully formed fair use rationale, however, no one will stop you from doing that. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:54, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only one source, this image has no author information. JJ98 (Talk) 04:55, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:FILM and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline guidelines. More than one source and "author" are not required. Have replaced image. -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 05:54, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Delete boiler plated FU rationale, not compliant with WP:NFCC to keep Fasach Nua (talk) 20:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Galaran flag.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fictional flag. Kelly ^hi! 05:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JohnELloyd-party.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 05:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tiestom.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 05:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mustachio.bashio.fellas.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 05:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HelloWorld.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, not sure what this is. Kelly ^hi! 05:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BJKlogo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo. Kelly ^hi! 05:17, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheWinterpogo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 05:17, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PaintFairy.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user image. Kelly ^hi! 05:20, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hankwithfan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 05:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Artsy Parabolic Trough3.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artsy Parabolic Trough4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Artsy Parabolic Trough2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Artsy Parabolic Trough1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Orphaned, and potentially non-free. According to the Sandia National Laboratories site, Sandia National Laboratories is run by Sandia Corporation, a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin. Thus it is quite possible that this is a work of Lockheed Martin and not the US Government, and therefore non-free and unfit for transfer to Commons. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:42, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The images seems quite useful. If I am not mistaken, images from Lockheed Martin is not non-free, but I am not sure. Since it is actually from Sandia National Laboratories, irrespective of it parent, shouldn't it qualify the current licence? Reh man 01:23, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the page indicates a copyright, and the organizations that they mention seem to indicate that this is a privately-operated facility. As a private firm, images from Lockheed Martin, are most definitely eligible for copyright. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:29, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The fellow I contacted at Sandia said the files were free to use as long as Sandia was identified as the source. They have an intellectual licensing department (http://ipal.sandia.gov/) that can be contacted to verify this. I uploaded a few hundred Sandia photos as I recall so you can check on the lot of them all at once. Mrshaba (talk) 01:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should forward this permission on to OTRS so we can have it on file. Otherwise, we have no evidence of permission. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:15, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a fine suggestion but unfortunately I don't seem to have the email from the Sandia webmaster anymore. My photo uploading was done in good faith but I can provide no proof of this. Evidence will have to be provided by contacting Sandia anew. Mrshaba (talk) 15:29, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I sent a note over to Sandia. Should hear back from them shortly. Mrshaba (talk) 15:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I have no doubt that the uploads were done in good faith, but still, we have to proceed with an abundance of caution. When you get the response, please forward to OTRS. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:08, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:05, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: This relist is mostly procedural. Rather than having it hang out until whenever in a needing-to-be-closed state, I have relisted it, deliberately keeping it in the FFD process for another week while we wait to see if we get the permission back. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:05, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- However, after the relist period ends, if we don't see permission, these files probably ought to be deleted. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note again: This is another relist to allow time for permissions and such to go through. The uploader has contacted me on my talk page (see User talk:SchuminWeb#OTRS?), however, there has been no evidence yet that anything was ever put through to OTRS. So I'm extending this discussion one final time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons' if the license can be verified Fasach Nua (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TUS Terminal Map09A.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed to be self-made, but these are clearly derivative works of the official Tucson International Airport terminal map [1] (PDF). —Bkell (talk) 15:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Erectpeyronies.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning NSFW. We have enough penis pictures. Kelly ^hi! 16:36, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mercia.GIF[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, redundant to File:Saint Alban's cross.svg. Kelly ^hi! 17:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mercia.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, redundant to File:Saint Alban's cross.svg. Kelly ^hi! 17:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RagPudding Cooking.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low quality. Kelly ^hi! 18:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EzraPound&IsabelPound1898.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear precisely why an image of the the young Pound is required (the military uniform could be illustrated in another way, and the "juxtaposition" seems to be OR) or why his mother needs to be in the image. Further, it is not clear why this image is irreplaceable. Certainly fails NFCC#8, may fail NFCC#1. J Milburn (talk) 18:38, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May not be important, but regarding copyright - I've been in contact with the publisher and the Yale Beinecke Library, and all that can be established is that neither the family nor the publisher hold copyright. No one has been able to identify the photographer - so he/she may have died 70 years ago, or not. We just don't know. I don't mind if it's deleted though. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 19:00, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the simple fact of it's uniqueness and value to the article about Ezra Pound, demonstrating his early relation with the military academy and his family; and the apparent ambiguity concerning whether or not it is in the PD. The image was re-added to the article by User:SlimVirgin after prior discussions with User:Truthkeeper88. In my opinion it helps the article...Modernist (talk) 19:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The "ambiguity" argument holds no water- if it's non-free (and, so far as we can tell, it is) then its use must be consistent with our non-free content criteria. If the "early relation with the military academy and his family" is important, that's fine, it can be discussed in the article- a non-free image is not needed. J Milburn (talk) 22:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree with JMilburn about letting the ambiguity argument go; but the picture is still needed, if it's non-free then the Fair Use Rationale is needed and used properly because the image does enhance our understanding of Pound by seeing him in uniform and by seeing him with his mother...Modernist (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's all well and good, but why do we need to do that? Do we also need to see him at school? See him at a friend's wedding? See him buying a sandwich? For us to use a non-free image, it has to be absolutely necessary to our understanding of the article. Unless it's essential that we do see the things you listed, as in, we would be unable to understand the topic without seeing them, then the image does not need to be used. J Milburn (talk) 00:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I can't see any harm in using this, and it adds to the educational value of that section, which discusses him in his military uniform. The image was taken in 1898, we have no idea who might own the copyright, and it was almost certainly published before 1923. The only problem is that we can't confirm that. But it certainly does add an important element of understanding about Pound's upbringing, as the rationale explains. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 00:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If it's non-free, it's non-free; the moment it's confirmed as free, of course, I will withdraw any objection to its use. In the mean time, it must be treated as non-free. The upbringing is important, but is addressed in the article text; why we need to see him like this is not as clear as you make out... J Milburn (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - ditto J Milburn is correct, prove it is free and it can be kept (although prefer move to commons) Fasach Nua (talk) 21:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

comment Incorrect, the image has a valid Fair Use Rationale and is needed in the article, all the better if its actually free...Modernist (talk) 06:12, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheHybridEditorXE.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned screenshot. Kelly ^hi! 19:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SOB billboard.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 19:27, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No it isn't a derirative work. It was taken by Ser Amantio as far as I'm aware. He should have at least said where it was taken though.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:54, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I meant it's derivative of the billboard. Kelly ^hi! 19:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pluto-symbol1.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, redundant to File:Pluto's astrological symbol.svg. Kelly ^hi! 20:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PICT0937.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 20:36, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mnemoc-avatar.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user image. Kelly ^hi! 21:18, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bisoctrizole.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, redundant to File:Bisoctrizole.svg Kelly ^hi! 21:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, there is a better version up. Fitz05 (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kopete 0.12.3.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned screenshot. Kelly ^hi! 21:25, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PaoloGuidici7.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, Unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 21:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RHD Phillips small picture.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto? Kelly ^hi! 21:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also File:RHD Phillips photo obit.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 21:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nockers.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 21:34, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Strategictactics.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned chart. Kelly ^hi! 21:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CAP 1990s.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is already at least one free image of this person (File:CarlosAndrésPérez GeorgeH.W.Bush.jpg), so there is no need for the use of additional non-free images like this one. /ƒETCH COMMS / 22:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FredMaas.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolution is too high to be fair use Snowman (talk) 23:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, we have {{non-free reduce}} for a reason, but it seems that the subject is actually still alive, so fair use is hard to claim here. /ƒETCH COMMS / 00:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the image has been replaced with one properly reduced. I apologize I must have loaded my working copy. The new one is a thumbnail 72px, i can reduce it in size further if you like. It is in keeping with fair use as it is a low res version being used to illustrate the subject in question, and no free equivalent is available. for my money that image is pre 1924 and is already out of copyright. EraserGirl (talk) 01:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the back of my brain just reminded me that WP needs to have the old hi res version history purged before a low res version can be used. if that's still the method, tell me and i will make it so. thx EraserGirl (talk) 01:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the image in the file history needs deleting, if this was a for a fair use. However, I understand that the author is still alive and fair use does not apply. The image needs deleting for a different reason than I put in my discussion for deletion listing. Snowman (talk) 08:54, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no FU rationale, thus fails nfcc Fasach Nua (talk) 21:04, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.