Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 April 30

< April 29	May 1 >

April 30[edit]

File:Christmascard1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 01:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Childhood-sketches-1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CVPreservation10 (talk) 01:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Animalletters.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CVPreservation10 (talk) 01:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Christmascard.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sketchbook.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samuelwhiskers.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Titleandendpages.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Peterrabbitletter.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hilltopfarm.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manuscript1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Originalmanuscript2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Firstedition3.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Firstedition.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Peter rabbit.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CV Preservation10 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ben Johnson 1988 Olympics - LAC a175370k.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8 - Image itself does not appear to be subject of commentary. Mosmof (talk) 03:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:342014201 l.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, subjects are unidentifiable. — ξ ^xplicit 03:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Congress Heights .JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality - image is entirely out of focus. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cooperscrossing.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, very poor image composition, and dirty lens. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- There's some slight glare against the rear windshield of the SUV parked on the side of the road, but it generally seems okay to me. ----DanTD (talk) 04:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I still have yet to even figure out what this is a picture of. The apartments (which ones)? The street? The driveway? The telephone pole? I consider the image composition to be poor enough to be useless to Wikipedia and to Commons, thus why we need to delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:12, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Idlingbus.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Landover Hills.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, out of focus, dirty lens. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Blurry as hell, low quality dusk shot. The only thing clear is the date stamp. Wasn't this image nomiated for deletion before? ----DanTD (talk) 06:28, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A very similar image, but this one is different. SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mt Vernon Square-7th Street-Convention Center Station.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, entirely out of focus. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spy Caricature Sir Robert Uniacke-Penrose-FitzGerald MP Cambridge 1st Bt of Corkbeg and Lisquinlan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by higher quality version on Commons : File:Robert Uniacke Penrose-Fitzgerald Vanity Fair 28 February 1895.jpg Rcbutcher (talk) 12:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC00015 Phimosis Ryan.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NSFW

I believe that Commons:Category:Phimosis has quite sufficient pics to cover our Phimosis needs, thus this is obsolete, also quite low quality. If it were commons, I'd use Commons:Template:Nopenis. Chzz ► 21:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – redundant to the files relating to the images in the abovelisted Commons category. –MuZemike 21:56, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – also needing to be deleted (and added above also) is the following image as it is exactly the same as the one nominated for deletion but rotated 90 degrees:

File:DSC00015 Small I.JPG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

–MuZemike 22:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Andromeda Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - consensus below is that the image is, by our rules, non-free. From this it currently fails NFCC#7 and 9 - Peripitus (Talk) 11:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work based on a graphic element owned by parties other than the uploader. Use is exclusive to a user box template. J Greb (talk) 21:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a letter "A", and no one can have copyrights for a letter or font (company hold copyrights for title Gene Roddenberry's(:) Andromeda, ship's name Andromeda and symbols in TV series, but "A" is not one of them. Image (letter "A" and star on background) was made for "Andromeda" articles, where other images can't be used, and not only for english wikipedia. Vilnisr (talk) 05:26, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fonts can be and are regularly put under copyright. This is especially true of highly stylized ones such as the Andromeda logo font. Mimicking the title card element - the starburst background - doesn't help make it any less a derivative work. Based on the intended use, picking a capital "A" from utilitarian such as Ariel would have been a better choice. That would avoid skirting the rights issue. - J Greb (talk) 05:54, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It makes no sence to make a picture with completely different font, because it will be useless in article, and there are a lot of Very similar fonts, similar to Andromeda's font, beside I use just one letter Vilnisr (talk) 06:24, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the letter can't be copyrighted but the background can be. Nyttend (talk) 17:17, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, "the letter can't be copyrighted but the background can be" - I made that background, and if letter is not the problem, then there is no reason for deletion. Vilnisr (talk) 16:00, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:StarTrek Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Delete - The image is clearly a derivative work of a copyrighted logo and as such is a non-free image itself. Non-free images are not used outside article space (see WP:NFCC#7 and 9) - Peripitus (Talk) 11:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work based on a graphic element owned by parties other than the uploader. Use is exclusive to a user box template. J Greb (talk) 21:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image was made by me and is not an exact "Star Trek" logo. Image was made for "Star Trek" articles, where other images can't be used, and not only for english wikipedia. If it's necessary, image can be set under fair use licence.Vilnisr (talk) 05:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That pretty much is the definition of "derivative work" - "Based on but not exactly 'their' property." - J Greb (talk) 05:47, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Then there is a lot of "derivative work" in wikipedia, and, as i said, it can be put under fair use licence, but if problem is image usage, than I did not have time to put it in article, and i don't see a problem for using in userbox about "Star Trek" Vilnisr (talk) 05:57, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That would mean that it is a non-free image and cannot be used as part of a userbox. It would also have to abide by WP:NFCC. - J Greb (talk) 06:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Then what about "File:H.png" (seen in House M.D series) or "File:JamieIcon.png" (no comment), and i can find a lot of similar images, and most of them are in Wikimedia Commons Vilnisr (talk) 06:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You simply have to delete thousands of images, 'cuz all of them can be somehow copyrighted, even picture of fruit, example from your page, I doubt that You made that swtch "File:Toggleswitch.PNG" Vilnisr (talk) 06:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this is clearly creative enough to be copyrightable, and unless our uploader can prove that he has the authority to release rights to images owned by whoever produced Star Trek, the uploader doesn't have the right to modify their images. This is a far cry from PD-textlogo images such as H.png, and it's not available under a free license such as JamieIcon.png or Toggleswitch.PNG. Nyttend (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is a very good artistic representation of the Star Trek logo. It probably be registered under non-free logos though, and write a note that it was created by a user. However, since Paramount Pictures (the copyright holder) has always used Silver with a gold edging for the logo they technically don't own it. I personally like the representation. Looks great in the userbox too.--Alpha Quadrant (talk) 01:58, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That still leaves it, at best and stretching it, as a derivative work. A non-free, regardless the sentiments of the person who put the pixels together. Something policy on Wikipedia keeps from being used in templates. - J Greb (talk) 02:02, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
KeepVilnisr (talk) 16:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Paramount has not complained, why should we.Natwebb (talk) 01:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Just because "Paramount has not complained" doesn't make it right. - J Greb (talk) 02:02, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Livin' la Vida Loca.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 as the file does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article. No critical commentary to justify its use. — ξ ^xplicit 23:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.