Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 May 13

< May 12	May 14 >

May 13[edit]

Pollymolchanova.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pollymolchanova.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrprops (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, probably Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 00:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I doubt it has the correct license. Zoo Fari 02:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Poolsidetomblake1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poolsidetomblake1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lunazzz (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - advertisement. --GRuban (talk) 17:24, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Porl.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shaneymike (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Possible Copyright violation, No evidence of GFDL permission Nv8200p talk 00:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Portauth.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portauth.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Themattcause80 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, No encyclopedic context Nv8200p talk 00:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Uche.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uche.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lutiseku (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom + likely copyvio. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Portobelloopost.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portobelloopost.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lutiseku (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Portobellopost.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portobellopost.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lutiseku (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:21, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Portrait_Jaimie-Lee_Wise.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait_Jaimie-Lee_Wise.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Basoex (notify | contribs).

Orphaned from deleted article Nv8200p talk 00:22, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Portraitmichaelparodi.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portraitmichaelparodi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andrew_Parodi (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Portraittoubab.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portraittoubab.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dofftoubab (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Poseage.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poseage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cleft19 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality Nv8200p talk 00:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Poser.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, moved to Commons

File:Poser.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hadseys (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:26, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sure we could work into the muscle article
Keep per the unsigned comment. There are clear applications for this image. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Poster1.JPEG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster1.JPEG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Augustulus (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, possible Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 00:29, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Posture1.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posture1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tealeaves101 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pottery_07-04-2008_12;04;21AM.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pottery_07-04-2008_12;04;21AM.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Billy_Hathorn (notify | contribs).

Orphaned Nv8200p talk 00:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PowerPunksMegazord.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PowerPunksMegazord.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tran.binh (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Powerpack_Chasing_God.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Powerpack_Chasing_God.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kathandnick (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cntm cYCLE 3 Girls.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted, tagged as ifr

Everyone relax. There's no point in escalating this... **— *BQZip01* —** ^talk

File:Cntm cYCLE 3 Girls.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wikipedian girl (notify | contribs).

This title should be corrected, proposing name will be CaNTM Cycle 3 Girls.jpg according to Wikipedia Naming convention policies. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 00:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you just think it should be renamed, I've now tagged it with {{ifr|CaNTM Cycle 3 Girls.jpg}}. Do you still think it should be listed here for deletion? – Quadell ^(talk) 01:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: that is the uploader's fault typing improper usage of small and capitalized letters. Please inform the uploader and assuming civility. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 11:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: You know what, I was in a rush, so don't try to even put this on me or even to make this a huge situation, just because I made mistakes as to typing the right capitalizations for the word. Redirect it if you want!Wikipedian girl (talk) 19:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Here, folks, click this link. How can you be mad at each other when you look at this adorable kitten? – Quadell ^(talk) 22:40, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Rename C'mon folks. Don't make me trout you! :-) — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Um...please redirect it! Like, you wanted it to be done!Wikipedian girl (talk) 20:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: WHO THE HELL DELETED MY PHOTO?! WHERE IS IT?! ApprenticeFan, WHAT DID YOU DO?! Wikipedian girl (talk) 23:12, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MaraNeo127_Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MaraNeo127_Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MaraNeo127 (notify | contribs).

Self-made. Not necessary on this website; wish for it to be deleted. MaraNeo127 (talk) 00:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Bayviewguesthouse.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate of File:Bayview Guesthouse.jpg. The File:Bayview Guesthouse.jpg is in use...this is not...therefore it is an orphan .....Todd^#661 09:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Duplicate file & orphan. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Loihi_bot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loihi_bot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Resident_Mario (notify | contribs).

Unclear source and license. PhilKnight (talk) 11:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to delete it; it has since been removed from the article when a copyright problem was spotted. ResMar 19:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PressingOnVideo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PressingOnVideo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 17Drew (notify | contribs).

Fails WP:NFCC#8 as the image does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Image adds to the article by showing the visual component of the video, which is essential to a description of the video. We let other screenshots from other videos in as well. A single screenshot is appropriate. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the existing text in the article is an adequate free substitute for this non-iconic image. fails NFCC#1 and 8 - Peripitus (Talk) 21:53, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ST-VOY_Hope_and_Fear.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-VOY_Hope_and_Fear.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thealok (notify | contribs).

Doesn't significantly add to the readers understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 15:22, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is always nice to have some kind of preview of an episode, no matter how small or pointless it may seem. It helps give direction on what the episode might be about. Also the image has been there since 2005. Obviously no one has seen a problem with it before. Neu_tralle 08:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-free image that does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article. Jay32183 (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We have plenty of images to show the cinematography of the series, this one isn't needed. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ST-VOY_The_Raven.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-VOY_The_Raven.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs).

Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is always nice to have some kind of preview of an episode, no matter how small or pointless it may seem. It helps give direction on what the episode might be about. Also the image has been there since 2005. Obviously no one has seen a problem with it before. Neu_tralle 08:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-free image that does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article. Jay32183 (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We have plenty of images to show the cinematography of the series, this one isn't needed. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ST-TNG_Descent_Part_1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG_Descent_Part_1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs).

Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 15:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is always nice to have some kind of preview of an episode, no matter how small or pointless it may seem. It helps give direction on what the episode might be about. Also the image has been there since 2005. Obviously no one has seen a problem with it before. Neu_tralle 08:51, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-free image that does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article. Jay32183 (talk) 20:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We have plenty of images to show the cinematography of the series, this one isn't needed. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ST-VOY_Unity.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-VOY_Unity.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Melesse (notify | contribs).

Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 15:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is always nice to have some kind of preview of an episode, no matter how small or pointless it may seem. It helps give direction on what the episode might be about. Neu_tralle 08:51, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-free image that does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article. Jay32183 (talk) 20:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We have plenty of images to show the cinematography of the series, this one isn't needed. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ST-TNG_I,_Borg_(Virus).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG_I,_Borg_(Virus).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nukleon (notify | contribs).

Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 15:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is always nice to have some kind of preview of an episode, no matter how small or pointless it may seem. It helps give direction on what the episode might be about. Also the image has been there since 2005. Obviously no one has seen a problem with it before. Neu_tralle 08:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-free image that does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article. Jay32183 (talk) 20:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We have plenty of images to show the cinematography of the series, this one isn't needed. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pubes.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pubes.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Madrex (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic, used only in an article tagged for A7. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 16:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete contingent upon article deletion. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

My3dogs.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:My3dogs.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Islaammaged126 (notify | contribs).

Unused, unencyclopedic personal photo. —Bkell (talk) 17:27, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MyFamily.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MyFamily.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Harrisonlatour (notify | contribs).

Unused, likely unencyclopedic. —Bkell (talk) 17:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Likely copyvio too. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Mohawk.GIF[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohawk.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Islaammaged126 (notify | contribs).

Unused, unencyclopedic. —Bkell (talk) 17:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Lunacolors.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lunacolors.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Islaammaged126 (notify | contribs).

Unused, unencyclopedic. —Bkell (talk) 17:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MyFriendSinging.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MyFriendSinging.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CinnamonCinder (notify | contribs).

Unused, likely unencyclopedic. —Bkell (talk) 17:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Hotcoffee.ogg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotcoffee.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ajfweb (notify | contribs).

No copyright tag, irrelevant. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 17:46, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete copyrighted sound clip not needed to understand the controversy. The image (quite graphic) is enough. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MyFirstSlide.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MyFirstSlide.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hideoushog (notify | contribs).

Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:46, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MyLogo.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MyLogo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Doommaster1994 (notify | contribs).

Unused, unencyclopedic. —Bkell (talk) 17:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MyPic.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MyPic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Manzoorali (notify | contribs).

Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MyPicture-1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MyPicture-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Muthafudgical (notify | contribs).

Unused; likely related to the deleted article Kevin Doherty (chef). —Bkell (talk) 17:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MyPicture2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MyPicture2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Judahzlion (notify | contribs).

Unused, digitally manipulated photo. Summary gives a name and very brief biography, but no indication of notability. —Bkell (talk) 17:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MyPicture 4.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MyPicture 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Arsone62 (notify | contribs).

Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 18:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Szapinka.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Delete - I've looked through this extensively and I see that (1) There is no source for this image and certainly no copyrightholder is identified (2) While it is possible that the image is PD without any useful source information this cannot be legitimately asserted and (3) Almost all of the uploader's other images have been deleted as lacking licensing or sources. Image fails NFCC#10c at least - Peripitus (Talk) 12:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Szapinka.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Itzik18 (notify | contribs).

Does not have a proper source as it isn't included at the site listed, the non-free content rationale doesn't correspond to the text of the article, and seeing one guy surrounded by a bunch of other guys doesn't aide the understanding of the Hasidic dynasty in a way that can't be expressed freely Jay32183 (talk) 20:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The source is listed as unknown. For many images the photographer and copyright owner is unknown to Wikipedia, and in some cases unknown to all. That is a valid, and correct statement of what we know about the source, and therefore complies with the requirement to indicate the source. We have entire categories of images for which that is true, e.g. logos and cover art, and that sometimes extends to historical photographs as it does here. One of the editors indicated that it is "probably" public domain, an assertion that is better checked out directly with the uploader than discussed in the hypothetical here. I note that the uploader created a great many articles about the Spinka dynasties back in 2005, and uploaded quite a few images, most of which are now deleted. In terms of process, nominating these one by one is entirely the wrong way to go about it. We should try to track down the uploader and get the straight story of where he got them from, and what he knows about the copyrights. Either they all go because they're inadequate, or we can write a proper nonfree rationale where it makes sense. Finally, this is not just "one guy", he is an important religious leader who was killed in the holocaust 60+ years ago. The physical appearance of leaders is not mere decoration, it shows us who they were. That is particularly true in the case of Spinka religious leaders whose style of dress, hair, and hats are out of the mainstream, but also serve to distinguish each group from the others. Vis-a-vis nonfree use policy and the purpose of our encyclopedia, it serves the reader to have this image, which is irreplaceable unless by a non-free image because we don't know of any others nor are any new ones apt to surface. There is almost certainly no copyright problem here given fair use, and if we tag the image properly any re-user of the articles can make their own decision about whether to include the image. Wikidemon (talk) 21:12, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The article doesn't discuss the appearance of any particular person. Significance to the topic is what matters, it's significance to understanding the topic. Non-free historical photo isn't the appropriate tag either, since the photo itself is not the topic of discussion in the article. Although unknown author can be allowed, no knowledge of any publication details is not. Jay32183 (talk) 21:26, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I notice that the nominator deleted the image caption in the process of nominating the image. We can fix that, and I'm happy to add sourced content describing the rabbi's appearance and the significance of that appearance to hassidism. I think the adequacy of the use rationale is a red herring. We can always get an adequate rationale. The real issue is where does the image come from, and that's obviously unclear. As for claims of publication the image (after adding some material from the article where it is used) says: "A print media The Jewish Press published author uses a related image at http://dixieyid.blogspot.com/2007/03/how-to-daven-for-ones-children.html / It is likely that this photo is in the public domain and was probably published in a periodical that no longer exists. / This pre-1944 photo appears on a travel agency web site collection. The man in the picture was murdered in 1944 (one of the Six Million). He is Rabbi Yitzhak (family name Weiss) of Spinka, author of Chakal Yitzchak. The travel agency, Trip Atlas, is based in Canada. The site included phone# 1-877-374-8747 / A print media (The Jewish Press) published author uses a related image at http://dixieyid.blogspot.com/2007/03/how-to-daven-for-ones-children.html. / It is likely that this photo is in the public domain and was probably published in a periodical that no longer exists. / Timing: Levaya/Funeral of the Minchas Elazar, according to http://hamercaz.com/hamercaz/site/mfile.php?id=2725&type=Photo, which is trying to preserve these rare, unique photos alive." That is a lot more publication information than we have for most images. If you're really curious as to where the uploader found the jpeg, something we don't require and is not present on most images, why not just ask? Wikidemon (talk) 22:01, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'm sure someone knows where this photo was taken. Once we have that info, there should be no problem in tagging it with the correct PD tag. Chesdovi (talk) 23:46, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - Actually the source information is required on all images and what you've included doesn't contain any. Are you checking the links? This isn't the image on the page. The other website mirror Wikipedia content, so they can't be counted as sources. The lack of a source is grounds for speedy deletion, and you don't just ask for the information. You mark for deletion. If the uploader doesn't change anything the image gets deleted. We do not use a wait and see approach. If it's a free image we need proof of free license. If it's a non-free image we need to know about the publication prior to it appearance on Wikipedia to satisfy WP:NFCC#4. You cannot always get an adequate rationale, and an image can not illustrate its own caption. There must be information in the article that would not otherwise be understood without the non-free image. You talk as if images don't get deleted every day for these exact reasons. WP:IUP#Requirements#2 "Always specify on the description page where the image came from (the source) and information on how this could be verified. Examples include scanning a paper copy, or a URL, or a name/alias and method of contact for the photographer." Jay32183 (talk) 06:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        All this talk about what "we" do does not include me, I'm afraid. The image has been here four years, it does not violate anybody's copyright, so we can take the time to do it the right way instead of trashing articles and images. No, proof is not necessary, just a claim. There is a claim of public domain that you simply don't believe. Your statement about the type of sourcing required is not an accurate reflection of Wikipedia practice, and the comment about captions is without any basis as far as I can tell. When images are deleted it is for a reason, not procedural arguments. Wikidemon (talk) 07:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        Images with PD tags and no source get deleted all the time. "Someone holds the copyright unless they have been explicitly placed in the public domain" WP:COPYRIGHT#Guidelines for images and other media files. "Proper attribution to the author or source of a work, even if it is in the public domain, is still required to avoid plagiarism." WP:PD. Your arguments are not based on WP:IUP or WP:NFCC. Jay32183 (talk) 07:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        This one has a statement of source, you simply dispute it. I'm quite familiar with NFCC and other image policies and guidelines. The other policy and guideline arguments you raise don't make enough sense for a response. Wikidemon (talk) 08:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        The link that isn't a Wikipedia mirror doesn't have this image. In what sense is there a source? Jay32183 (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As a "unique historic image" per the license notice on the image's page. The subject of the image has been dead for 60+ years. No suitable non-free image has been proposed to date, and it appears unlikely that one could be found. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here @} 02:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The "unique historic image" claim is for when the image itself is the subject of discussion, it isn't. Even if a free image cannot be produced non-free images must contribute significantly to the readers' understanding. Since the article is about a dynasty, not this person, and no particular person is discussed in such depth that we would need to see him or her, this image does not significantly contribute to the readers' understanding. Non-free images still need sources. Jay32183 (talk) 06:47, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, you made your point very clear when you edit warred over the image (and got blocked for it). We still don't know whether or not this is a non-free image. It's highly doubtful it has any copyright whatsoever because of its age. The fact is, it is unique, historic and doubtful it could be replaced with another free image of him. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here @} 07:20, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Obviously I haven't made my point if that's your argument. We don't know the copyright status of the image because we have no source, which is a criterion for speedy deletion. Being replaceable by another image is not the only thing that stops a non-free image from being used. We don't have an author or date of first publication so we can't really talk about its age. Jay32183 (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - The photo was taken and most certainly processed before 1944. Chesdovi (talk) 18:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        And your source for that is where? Jay32183 (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        The man was murdered in 1944. Do you need someone to draw you a picture (which I'm sure you'll nom for deletion too)? - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here @} 20:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        As Allstarecho has said, we use common sense in such cases of old images with an unverifiable history. Chesdovi (talk) 23:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        Sources are required for all images. We don't make assumptions. Jay32183 (talk) 06:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        Also note, if you click the link listed as the source you do not find the image. It's not a source if the image isn't actually there. Jay32183 (talk) 06:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        Wikipedia has aknowledged the problem with deadlinks. That reason alone is not enough to delete. Chesdovi (talk) 17:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        But why would that site have ever put this image on their main page? I can't read the content, but it looks like they're discussing only events that took place recently. Jay32183 (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and update FUR for this copyrighted photo. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image can't satisfy WP:NFCC without indicating a valid source. Jay32183 (talk) 06:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Conyza bonariensis.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Conyza bonariensis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Iorsh (notify | contribs).

User:Iorsh hasn't actually claimed to be author of this image it was assumed by other users, as such we don't have a proper source or evidence of permission Jay32183 (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination borders somewhere between silly and tendentious. In late 2004 and early 2005 Iorsh uploaded a series of pictures of flowers he/she took in Israel, and affixed a license tag to each, donating them to the public domain. This image is in the middle of that series. Iorsh made an edit to this particular image, with edit summary "provenance", describing how and where he/she took the image, in this case "image taken on the slopes of Mount Carmel"[1] The now-deprecated license tag includes the claim "This file has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder."[2] When asked about Image:Echinops adenocaulos.jpg, an image with an identical history ("provenance" edit and same license tag)[3], the editor "clarified" the copyright status to state explicitly it was his/her "own work".[4] A similar sequence of events happened with Image:Cistus incanus.jpg as well, which Iorsh also describes as "taken on the slopes of Mount Carmel, Israel".[5] It is obvious per Occam's razor, WP:DUCK, and probably WP:AGF, that this image is the same as the others. Interpreting this as anything other than the uploader's own photograph would require some rather convoluted hypothetical reasoning. Another editor fixed the license tag accordingly,[6] and the nominator edit warred speedy tagging this and one other image until blocked for a WP:3RR violation. Given that the uploader is still here, if anyone has a concern it's best addressed by simply asking the uploader, which I have done.[7] Let's wait for an answer, but even without an answer this is an obvious case of a public domain license. Wikidemon (talk) 21:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- We must have proof of license and we don't. User:Iorsh hasn't said anything, we cannot assume just because other images were similar. Until User:Iorsh confirms, we have nothing. Although the time and place the image was taken is indicated, there was no indication of who took the picture. Maybe User:Iorsh got it from a friend, we would then need permission from the friend. Jay32183 (talk) 06:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - If User:Iorsh confirms, however, I would be happy to move the image to the Commons myself. PD-self would make it a candidate. Jay32183 (talk) 07:03, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per Wikidemon. Hesperian 23:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per above. – Quadell ^(talk) 01:32, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

HenryHeadc1895.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HenryHeadc1895.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pudupudu (notify | contribs).

Low quality (small, kind of jaggedy), replaced by File:Henry Head.jpg. howcheng {chat} 22:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.