Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 July 14

< July 13	July 15 >

July 14

File:Mohammad salim khan with Farhana.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammad salim khan with Farhana.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dheraikhan (notify | contribs).

Image being used to evade article notability requirements. MBisanz ^talk 02:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emma Wascher Sara Baldocchi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emma Wascher Sara Baldocchi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ewascher (notify | contribs).

Vanity image, subjects unknown. MBisanz ^talk 02:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sreeves.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sreeves.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by D C McJonathan (notify | contribs).

Image can't have been published before 1923 since subject wasn't born until 1926. Source site is a wiki (findagrave), so the copyright holder is unknown. Damiens.rf 04:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The article mentions the existence of public domain movies with this guy. Will try to produce a free screenshot. --Damiens.rf 01:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done. Free alternatives avaliable at commons: File:Steve Reeves.png and File:Steve Reeves 2.jpg. --Damiens.rf 14:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KellieLightbourn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:KellieLightbourn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nick833 (notify | contribs).

Image is said to be self-made and also to belong to ted-wes-photo. It's more likely a copyvio. Damiens.rf 04:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arossi5.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arossi5.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by J mcandrews (notify | contribs).

I have a number of problems with this photo. Firstly I don't believe it to be a "simple, documentary photo", but even if I'm wrong about that, this should still be deleted. This image is used in Italian architect Aldo Rossi's article, and is this clearly a building/sculpture. Italy does not have freedom of panorama, so this image has a copyright and is not public domain. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 09:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:File name.ext

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "File_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put the name of the uploader just after "Uploader=", and your reason for deletion just after "Reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kamlesh Verma (talk) 10:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jodi Rell.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jodi Rell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wesley M. Curtus (notify | contribs).

According to the Hartford Courant the image is from Rell's office and not from the federal government, making it non-free. Hekerui (talk) 12:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)][reply]

Annnd I'm sure Rell's office is going to be suing wikipedia because we're using her official portrait. However, I've written to her office to ask for permission.Wm.C (talk) 23:09, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i've gotten permission from the office of M. Jodi Rell, as copied here.

""Yes, you may use Governor Rell’s official portrait. As you are probably aware, it is located on her website.

Anna M. Ficeto

Legal Counsel

Office of Governor M. Jodi Rell

Hartford, CT 06106

""

So i'll be updating the page per new information. Wm.C (talk) 17:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't ask for the picture to be licensed under a free license. "Allowing use" is too vague. The copyright holder needs to confirm a free license like the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 and the confirmation must be valid. Or it must be made clear on the governor website that the picture is useable under a free license. Ask the office to send an OTRS and don't remove the deletion template from the file page again while the discussion is going on here. See: Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for more infoHekerui (talk) 18:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask what the problem is here? Are you trying to make it difficult for a clearer picture of the good governor to take shape? Do you want me to forward the email to you? Because what they said was pretty clear to me: They don't care if we're using it now, and are releasing it. Do you want me to bother them again? It would seem to anyone that the permission has been given. Until someone other than you posts form blocks decrying my evil use of permission given pictures, I won't bother with it. Wm.C (talk) 19:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence of permission which explicitly indicates an image's release under a free license is needed, as Hekerui said. Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission has information on how to do this. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prabhakaran family.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Delete - image fails NFCC#3a and/or NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 11:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prabhakaran family.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snowolfd4 (notify | contribs).

This non-free picture is not useful or necessary to show the reader "what a luxurious life (Velupillai Prabhakaran) spent". It's not a historic image by any account, and provides no information that can't be made accesible to the reader using text alone. Damiens.rf 14:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep How can you describe how a person looks using "using text alone"? All the people shown in the picture are dead, and no free pictures are available of them. The image is used to help readers identify Prabhakan and his family, and significantly contributes to their knowledge of the subject. Also, the copyright holder of the image, Prabhakan himself, is dead, and its use here will in no way be detrimental to his future commercial use of the image. As he is dead, he is also unlikely to apply any copyright he holds of the image. --snowolfD4 ^{( talk / @ )} 23:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- J. R. R. Tolkien is dead. He is also unlikely to apply any copyright he holds of his books. --Damiens.rf 14:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this discussion is about an image of Velupillai Prabhakaran, about which, by the way, you have failed to address any of my points. --snowolfD4 ^{( talk / @ )} 15:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete I see no explanation for how this is in any way a suggestion of a "luxurious life", also, I agree that its relatively useless as well. --Icemansatriani (talk) 05:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The luxurious life comment was added by an anonymous IP, and has now been removed. The purpose of the picture is to enable the readers of the article to identify Prabhakran and his family, which can't be done using text or free images. --snowolfD4 ^{( talk / @ )} 15:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not about Prabhakaran's family members, and there's actually some BLP concerns when we consider if we really want to show the familuy members of someone hunt down and killed by the army of his country. --Damiens.rf 21:19, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The image fails the minimal use criteria WP:NFCC#3a because there is already one non-free image showing the subject of the article and there is also no critical commentary about this picture that might attempt to justify its inclusion. ww2censor (talk) 20:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a family portrait of the once horrifying terror leader. pictures of his family were regarded as a closely guarded secret and now these albums are in the hand of Sri Lankan military so there is no means to replace these by the free content. People in the portrait are dead and it is unlikely to find any other copies of these. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 14:06, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Ww2censor, or delete the other image if you prefer. Stifle (talk) 22:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete family members are not notable themselves and Prabhakaran is already portrayed in another fair use image in the article. Hekerui (talk) 11:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gotabhaya handout.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gotabhaya handout.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snowolfd4 (notify | contribs).

Non-free image used to show what Gotabhaya Rajapaksa (a living, public man) looks like. Damiens.rf 14:59, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, If the nominator read the fair use rational, he would have understood that even though Defence Secretary Rajapakse is alive, given the high security and death threats surrounding him, it is impossible to take a free image of him. This image is used in the article to identify Rajapakse, who is a public figure, and the subject of the article. Its use is therefore acceptable on Wikipedia as it significantly contributes to the readers understanding of the subject of the article. Also, this image is from a handout released by the Sri Lankan Ministry of Defence for the free use of the press, and its reproduction of Wikipedia does not undermine the potential for marketing benefits for the copyright holder. --snowolfD4 ^{( talk / @ )} 23:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Snowolfd4. Sandstein 15:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per user Snowolfd4. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 14:23, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - From what I can see on the web he has an official website and is a widely photographed individual, and the assertion that security prevents photography is rather weak. Sure he is surrounded by security, but how is that different from many across troubled parts of the world, some of whom we have free images of ?. I can't see any evidence that anyone has done the simple thing of asking his office for a suitable image or any of the other methods that might be used to get a free image. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:45, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pillayan swearing in.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pillayan swearing in.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snowolfd4 (notify | contribs).

Image is not free. Source cite states "Reproduction of news items are permitted when used without any alterations to contents". Unlikely candidate for a valid fair use rationale. Damiens.rf 15:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tenille Tayla.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tenille Tayla.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nicoleeee woly (notify | contribs).

Delete: orphaned image associated with deleted article: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tenille Tayla that failed notability. ww2censor (talk) 15:30, 14 July 2009 (UTC) ww2censor (talk) 15:30, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Velupillai Prabhakaran.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Keep - though perhaps this copy is sourced from a press site, as admitted by Getty Images the copyright is not theirs and the image is ok by NFCC#2- Peripitus (Talk) 04:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Velupillai Prabhakaran.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sandstein (notify | contribs).

Unauthorized use of a unique, hard-to-take, valuable picture owned by photo agency Getty Images. Damiens.rf 15:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as uploader. Velupillai Prabhakaran is dead, so I believe our use of this image to illustrate the article about him is proper fair use pursuant to WP:NFCC. Also, according to the source page, the photo was made not by the photo agency, but handed out to the press by the Tamil Tigers as a propaganda photograph. Given that the Tigers are outlawed as a terrorist group practically everywhere, they are unlikely to attempt to enforce any copyright regarding this image. Sandstein 15:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Although the nominator may find this hard to believe, in the absence of free images it is not practical to try and describe what people look like using "free text", hence the reason to have WP:NFCC, which this image. --snowolfD4 ^{( talk / @ )} 23:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I never suggested that. I just don't think Getty will be any more permissive with the use of their images if we give them the argument "we have no free alternative". --Damiens.rf 14:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd taken the time to look at the actual image, or read Sandstein's comment above, you'll have understood that Getty doesn't hold the copyright of this image. --snowolfD4 ^{( talk / @ )} 15:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Getty Images isn't the rightful owner of this image. It's the LTTE and there is no living leader for them at this moment. All of them are either dead or captured by the military. Hence not violating the copyrights and irreplaceable. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 14:14, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GotabayaJaffna.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GotabayaJaffna.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lanka07 (notify | contribs).

Image not found on source, no fair use rationale, not clearly necessary for the two article it's currently being used in. Damiens.rf 15:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the source details, but delete if no suitable rationale is added. ww2censor (talk) 15:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I've tagged the image with {{Di-no fair use rationale}}.--Rockfang (talk) 20:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A historic image, owned by the Sri Lankan Army. Hence cannot be replaced with free content. Denzil Kobbekaduwa and Gotabhaya Rajapaksa can be found in this image. It is in use with more than one article, hence I request to keep this image. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 14:21, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Steve Housden @ the Avalon Guitar workshops th.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete as F1: file that is a copy, in the same file format and same or lower quality/resolution. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:12, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steve Housden @ the Avalon Guitar workshops th.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stevemac3 (notify | contribs).

Delete: low resolution version of File:Steve Housden @ the Avalon Guitar workshops.JPG. ww2censor (talk) 16:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dansayer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dansayer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Olly gane (notify | contribs).

Delete: image associated with non-notable article Dan sayer that was deleted in January 2008. ww2censor (talk) 16:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Derek Spiller in 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Derek Spiller in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FlipHKD (notify | contribs).

Delete: orphaned image associated with non-notable deleted article Derek Spiller. ww2censor (talk) 16:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wrigtwood-shops.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wrigtwood-shops.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jamesb01 (notify | contribs).

duplicate file, orphaned. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 18:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This file is licensed. I have tagged an unlicensed, duplicate file as redundant speedy delete. If one of the two are kept, it should be the licensed one.--Rockfang (talk) 20:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:102983937 fe71baa630.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:102983937 fe71baa630.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jubella (notify | contribs).

Unused image, no encyclopedic purpose. — Σxplicit 19:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geneve 4ever.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geneve 4ever.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Carrizo13 (notify | contribs).

Likely fake album cover for deleted article 4Ever U, 4Ever U Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 19:41, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.