Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 16

< February 15	February 17 >

February 16[edit]

MarstersPiccoloDBE.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MarstersPiccoloDBE.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Killa_Koz (notify | contribs).

Purely decorative usage. Fails Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria Garion96 (talk) 00:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom.--TRU CO 19:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Arpes beamline.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arpes beamline.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Neburzaragoza (notify | contribs).

source NOT cc license Shizhao (talk) 01:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

DianaPro16.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DianaPro16.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Miss-simworld (notify | contribs).

Redundant to already existing non-free image in article. THe changes can be described with text and thus the image fails WP:NFCC#1. Peripitus (Talk) 02:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no reason to have both. Nyttend (talk) 01:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Camillefamily.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camillefamily.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Miss-simworld (notify | contribs).

non-free press image used in a gallery. Fails WP:NFCC#2 as this use replaces that which the original copyright holder (Life) intended (control over the use of the image) Peripitus (Talk) 02:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Chamounfamily2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chamounfamily2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Miss-simworld (notify | contribs).

non-free press image used in a gallery. Fails WP:NFCC#2 as this use replaces that which the original copyright holder (Life) intended (control over the use of the image) Peripitus (Talk) 02:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.141.130 (talk) 04:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ŌtaniYoshitsuguKessen.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ŌtaniYoshitsuguKessen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BlueCaper (notify | contribs).

non-free image from a current game to show how a historic thing looked. Fails WP:NFCC#2 and WP:NFCC#1 - replaces the commercial use the image was created for (control over copies is the right of the creator) and a free image could be created that serves the same purpose Peripitus (Talk) 02:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Arisaka's.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arisaka's.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dominick1283 (notify | contribs).

Replaceable fair use - fails WP:NFCC#1. The weapons shown still exist and as such taking a replacement free image is possible. Though getting a free image may be difficult it is far from impossible. Peripitus (Talk) 02:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As I've said in my comments on the other three discussions of this group: I can't imagine how this could pass the criteria; as Peripitus says, it's easily replaceable. Nyttend (talk) 21:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Gewehr Commission rifle.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gewehr Commission rifle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dominick1283 (notify | contribs).

Replaceable fair use - fails WP:NFCC#1. The weapon shown still exists and as such taking a replacement free image is possible. Though getting a free image may be difficult it is far from impossible. Peripitus (Talk) 02:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As I've said in my comments on the other three discussions of this group: I can't imagine how this could pass the criteria; as Peripitus says, it's easily replaceable. Nyttend (talk) 21:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

BakerBrownBessComparison.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BakerBrownBessComparison.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dominick1283 (notify | contribs).

Replaceable fair use - fails WP:NFCC#1. The weapon shown still exists and as such taking a replacement free image is possible. Though getting a free image may be difficult it is far from impossible. Peripitus (Talk) 02:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As I've said in my comments on the other three discussions of this group: I can't imagine how this could pass the criteria; as Peripitus says, it's easily replaceable. Nyttend (talk) 21:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pedersoli 1816.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedersoli 1816.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dominick1283 (notify | contribs).

Replaceable fair use - fails WP:NFCC#1. The weapon shown still exists and as such taking a replacement free image is possible. Though getting a free image may be difficult it is far from impossible. Peripitus (Talk) 02:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As I've said in my comments on the other three discussions of this group: I can't imagine how this could pass the criteria; as Peripitus says, it's easily replaceable. Nyttend (talk) 21:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Another Brad.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Another Brad.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pinkgirl1995 (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 05:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Arata Picture 030708.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arata Picture 030708.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marata1 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, sideways Skier Dude (talk) 05:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Michael Arata 2008.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep -Nv8200p talk 03:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael Arata 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marata1 (notify | contribs).

unused image - possibly intended for Michael Arata Skier Dude (talk) 05:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it certainly is him - now added to the article - Peripitus (Talk) 20:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

CH 07-05-2008 12;41;23PM.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CH 07-05-2008 12;41;23PM.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Billy Hathorn (notify | contribs).

orphaned, oddly cropped Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like a nice picture of a church, and it would be rather useful, except without identification we can't use it with any accuracy. Nyttend (talk) 21:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Chris-tiu-200x300.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chris-tiu-200x300.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by GretchBacayan (notify | contribs).

orphaned, possibly for Chris Tiu, otherwise UE Skier Dude (talk) 05:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

DSC 0576.jpg.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0576.jpg.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Johnherrick (notify | contribs).

orphaned, sideways image Skier Dude (talk) 05:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete And useless, as far as I can tell. Nyttend (talk) 01:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Dean Harris March 2007.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dean Harris March 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bobisatree (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 05:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Doc Holliday grave 06-30-2008 09;22;03PM.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doc Holliday grave 06-30-2008 09;22;03PM.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Billy Hathorn (notify | contribs).

orphaned, sideways image Skier Dude (talk) 05:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ed Minton in Dundee.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ed Minton in Dundee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrs-gerard-way-eth (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 05:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Joshua DeLung in 2007.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joshua DeLung in 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joshuadelung (notify | contribs).

orphaned vanity/personal image Skier Dude (talk) 06:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Talkpage Auawise.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Talkpage Auawise.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aua (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 06:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, as the author, I say take it down!

Cheers mate!

Λuα ^{(Operibus anteire)} 20:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Lalah Hathaway.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete as replaceable fair use. Non-free images of living people can only be used if there is no plausible way of taking a photo of that person, or if a photo taken now would be so different from the non-free photo that it would not be possible to use it. Stifle (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lalah Hathaway.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tarysky (notify | contribs).

replaceable fair use - as a still living person the image fails WP:NFCC#1 - see Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images_2 - Point 12 of the types of unnacceptable images Pictures of people still alive... provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. This includes non-free promotional images Peripitus (Talk) 06:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This should be kept. It's copyrighted and it's a usable image. 198.86.17.162 (talk) 18:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This a good and recent image of the singer. I think that image is non-replaceable and license tag fits, well. Whatevertag (talk) 18:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. To represent the subject of an article, fair use images of living persons are not allowed. ViperSnake151 20:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I took that example from the India.Arie "I Am Not My Hair" photo. This can be used. Tarysky (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No it can't. NFCC 1 says that if it can be replaced by a free equivalent, it cannot be used. period. ViperSnake151 00:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: It can. The page has been uploaded and expressed the exact same way as this page. [1] Plus, there is no other image that replaces it at the moment. Tarysky (talk) 00:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Replaceable non-free content. Fails wp:nfcc#1. Garion96 (talk) 21:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no evidence that it's not copyrighted. If this really weren't copyrighted (i.e. released into the public domain), there wouldn't be a problem, but unless it's released, we can't use it. By the way, if Tarysky says it's not a fair use, and Garion says it fails the criterion, why did you say "keep"? Did you mean to say "delete", or did you accidentally write something other than you meant? Nyttend (talk) 21:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: after I left this comment, Garion changed "Keep" to "Delete". Nyttend (talk) 22:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There no evidence that it is. However, if I contact Hathaway on her myspace page and get her approval, would be able to stay? Tarysky (talk) 23:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. See your talk page. Nyttend (talk) 01:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was directed to this page by a fan. What is needed for this image to remain? Lalahhath (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lalah, since you've opened a Wikipedia account, thanks! Please look at your talk page to see my answer. Click on the (talk) after "Lalahhath" at the end of your comment to get to your talk page. Nyttend (talk) 00:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from Lalahhath's talk page: "I would love for Wikipedia to use the photos. But I will not give up the rights of the photos." Can't imagine any way that these could be kept. Nyttend (talk) 13:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Lalah let go promotion.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lalah let go promotion.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tarysky (notify | contribs).

replaceable fair use - as a still living person the image fails WP:NFCC#1 - see Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images_2 - Point 12 of the types of unnacceptable images Pictures of people still alive... provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. This includes non-free promotional images Peripitus (Talk) 06:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Clearly replaceable non-free content. Garion96 (talk) 21:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Repeat my comment above, no reason why someone couldn't take a picture of her. Nyttend (talk) 21:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

A modern IMME 1200 BMW motorbike.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:A modern IMME 1200 BMW motorbike.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Artaxerex (notify | contribs).

replaceable fair use image that fails WP:NFCC#1 - the bike exists still and a free replacement image can be taken Peripitus (Talk) 06:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ralph-lauren-clock-plates.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ralph-lauren-clock-plates.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Artaxerex (notify | contribs).

replaceable fair use image that fails WP:NFCC#1 - the items exist still and a free replacement image (or images) can be taken Peripitus (Talk) 06:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Joshkaplan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joshkaplan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jbklego (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 06:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

My favourite food.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:My favourite food.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mic of orion (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 06:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted under CSD#F1: it's redundant to File:Punjena Paprika.JPG, which incidentally is being used for two different articles. Nyttend (talk) 01:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

THNKQ.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:THNKQ.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by X telegram x (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 06:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Eaten ur doods.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eaten ur doods.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vranak (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 07:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, not quite sure why I made or uploaded that but it should definitely be deleted. Vranak (talk) 20:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted under CSD #G7, as Vranak has requested deletion. Nyttend (talk) 01:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

4runner.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:4runner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fallerd (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, little encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 07:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

B20-graphictext-AT.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:B20-graphictext-AT.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ATS 500 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned and unencyclopedic Peripitus (Talk) 08:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

AT-B20-graphic.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AT-B20-graphic.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ATS 500 (notify | contribs).

orphaned and unencyclopedic Peripitus (Talk) 08:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

A T B20-graphic.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:A T B20-graphic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ATS 500 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image - no encyc use I can see Peripitus (Talk) 08:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cox.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cox.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 10014derek (notify | contribs).

Orphaned image with no conceivable use here Peripitus (Talk) 09:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ragnar.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ragnar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dankrouse (notify | contribs).

orphaned image of someone's friends Peripitus (Talk) 09:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can't imagine what we'd do with this unless one became notable, and keeping for that reason would be crystalballish. Nyttend (talk) 19:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Le Moyne clock tower back.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, now in use. Andrew c ^[talk] 15:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Moyne clock tower back.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Omar qaqish (notify | contribs).

orphaned and too blurry to use Peripitus (Talk) 09:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, now in use, don't see why it won't work where I put it. Find a better picture and it's time for deletion, but in the mean time, it's better than nothing. Nyttend (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now, but mark as poor quality/replacement requested. Stifle (talk) 15:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tartufo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tartufo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mesgourmandises (notify | contribs).

orphaned image that is redundant to (for our purposes) File:Cinnamon Tartufo.png. Latter image is used and is of the same desert Peripitus (Talk) 09:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it appears that one is cropped from the other, and surely the surrounding bits of table, chair, etc. aren't helpful for background scenery :-) When I first saw this, I thought "well, perhaps they're different regions of the desert". Nyttend (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ciaran Gym.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ciaran Gym.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Qxl32 (notify | contribs).

orphaned blurry gym shot - no encyc use Peripitus (Talk) 09:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can't imagine what we'd do with a picture like this. Nyttend (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Godslug.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Andrew c (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Godslug.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wcitti (notify | contribs).

orphaned image uploaded for deleted article - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AmazingSuperPowers Peripitus (Talk) 09:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Murillo.seller.300pix.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Murillo.seller.300pix.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Arpingstone (notify | contribs).

Deprecated by high-res on Commons Papa November (talk) 11:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Listenmusicvideo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Fails WP:NFCC#1 The images are replaceable with text. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Seeing the screenshots is not necessary to the understanding of the article. -Nv8200p talk 04:17, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Listenmusicvideo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Legolas2186 (notify | contribs).

This is merely an image of the artists, and adds nothing to readers' understanding of the article in which it is used. Its omission would similarly not be detrimental to that understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stifle (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is not a mere image of the artist. There are two different images which describes the two music videos shot for the song. Its omission will be detrimental to the article inconcern. 220.227.179.5 (talk) 10:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Simoneheroes.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -Nv8200p talk 04:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simoneheroes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Silvestris (notify | contribs).

Non-free image of living person. Damiens.rf 14:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as replaceable: it's almost certainly a better quality image than we could hope to get by a private photographer, but "better quality" isn't a valid reason to use a nonfree image. Nyttend (talk) 19:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tongue1.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -Nv8200p talk 04:07, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tongue1.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jpbrenna (notify | contribs).

Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 14:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

TwoGuineas1740.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Slavish copying. -Nv8200p talk 04:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TwoGuineas1740.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hephaestos (notify | contribs).

The coin itself is clearly PD due to its age. However, photos of 3D objects acquire their own copyright. No information is provided about the source of the image Papa November (talk) 15:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The rule is creativity; and in what way has the creator (whoever it is) displayed any creativity in this image? Nyttend (talk) 17:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There does not appear to be any artistic creativity shown in the making of this image, it's just a flat image of the coin. -- Arwel Parry (talk) 18:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per {{PD-art}}. It isn't really a 3D object. Stifle (talk) 15:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Alden-Wisconsin.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alden-Wisconsin.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eric outdoors (notify | contribs).

Map shows the wrong place. Alden is actually located in much farther south in the county, as shown on this Census Bureau map. Furthermore, we already have a good map showing Alden on Commons, so there's no need to rework this one. Uploader has not been notified, but he's not made any edits since March 2007 Nyttend (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Flashcat.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete -Nv8200p talk 04:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flashcat.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mixwell (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 19:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Koldfiremixed.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Hersfold (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koldfiremixed.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KoldFire (notify | contribs).

Not needed. KoldFire (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

KoldFire.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Hersfold (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:KoldFire.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KoldFire (notify | contribs).

Image is orphan. KoldFire (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Brad Paisley Mud on the Tires.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brad Paisley Mud on the Tires.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Holiday56 (notify | contribs).

Per precedent, sheet music covers can't be used to identify the song in question. Misrepresentation of {{Non-free album cover}} as well. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 23:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.